Cited by 80Gut microbiota and healthAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

The interaction of short-chain fatty acids with adipose tissue: relevance for prevention of type 2 diabetes

Roelofsen, H., Priebe, M., Vonk, R.·2010·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

Short chain fatty acids (SCFA) are the main bacterial metabolites of colonic fermentation processes. The physiological relevance of the SCFA for the host outside the gastrointestinal tract is getting increased attention. In this review we will focus on the effect of SCFA on inflammation processes in the host in relation to insulin resistance. Obesity has been associated with a pro-inflammatory state of the adipose tissue that is associated with whole body insulin resistance leading to type 2 diabetes. Recently, two G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) for SCFA, GPCR 41 and GPCR43, were described that are mainly expressed by immune cells but also by adipose tissue. Propionate can induce the satiety hormone leptin and reduce expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines indicating that SCFA have anti-inflammatory effects in human adipose tissue. In addition, in human nutritional experiments we observed that whole grain products could counteract a glucose-induced tumour necrosis factor α and interleukin-6 increase which was associated with increased plasma butyrate concentrations. This suggests that dietary fibre can produce a SCFA profile that could have anti-inflammatory effects in the body. The physiological relevance of these observations especially in relation to obesity-associated inflammation and insulin resistance is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2010.0028

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCFAs can reduce inflammation.

    “reduce inflammation [225]”

    From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [225]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roelofsen, H., Priebe, M., & Vonk, R.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
433-438
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W1986350670
Cited by
80
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
short-chain fatty acids, adipose tissue, type 2 diabetes prevention, insulin resistance, obesity, inflammation, GPR41, GPR43, butyrate, leptin, dietary fiber, whole grains, TNF-α, interleukin-6, colonic fermentation, gut microbiota metabolites
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Animals, Bacteria, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review