Cited by 127Disability Education and EmploymentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Barriers and Facilitators to Employment for Adults With Autism: A Scoping Review

Open access
Harmuth, Erin, Silletta, Emerald, Bailey, Anthony, Adams, Tracy, Beck, Charlotte, Barbic, Skye Pamela·2018·Annals of International Occupational Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/24761222-20180212-01

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harmuth, E., Silletta, E., Bailey, A., Adams, T., Beck, C., & Barbic, S. P.
Venue
Annals of International Occupational Therapy
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2018-04
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
31-40
ISSN
  • 2476-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 2476-1230
OpenAlex
W2796368235
Cited by
127
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Annals of International Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, employment, autistic adults, barriers to employment, employment support, occupational therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review