Cited by 174Disability Education and EmploymentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchEmployment and Welfare Studies

Predictors of employment status among adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Ohl, Alisha, Grice Sheff, Mira, Small, Sarah, Nguyen, Jamie, Paskor, Kelly, Zanjirian, Aliza·2017·Work

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) experience high rates of unemployment and underemployment in relation to adults with other disabilities and the general population. Yet there is little research examining their employment experiences and the predictors of employment status. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the employment characteristics and histories of both employed and unemployed adults with ASD, and the factors that contributed to their employment status. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used an online survey and the Short Effort Reward Imbalance (ERI) Scale to gather data. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of employment status and self-reported health. RESULTS: Of the 254 adults with ASD who participated in this study, 61.42% were employed and 38.58% were unemployed. Over half of the participants reported job imbalance on the Short ERI Scale and the vast majority did not receive any job assistance. Participants who disclosed their ASD diagnosis to their employer were more than three times as likely to be employed than those who did not disclose. Education level was also a significant predictor of employment status. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests disability disclosure and education level are factors that contribute to employment status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-172492

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These atypical social and communication differences may complicate interactions with neurotypical peers, risking employment participation vulnerabilities in this population, which has an unemployment rate four times higher than that of the general population.

    “These atypical social and communication differences may complicate their interactions with neurotypical peers [9,10,11], risking employment participation vulnerabilities in this population, which has an unemployment rate four times higher than that of the general population [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohl, A., Grice Sheff, M., Small, S., Nguyen, J., Paskor, K., & Zanjirian, A.
Affiliations
  • Clarkson University (US)
  • Minnesota Department of Health, Maternal & Child Health Section, MN, USA
  • Holy Name Medical Center (US)
  • New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (US)
  • New York City Department of Education (US)
Venue
Work
Published
2017-03-14
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
345-355
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W2589101104
Cited by
174
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
26.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, employment status, unemployment, underemployment, effort-reward imbalance, disability disclosure, educational attainment, self-reported health, adults with disabilities
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review