Cited by 47Phytoestrogen effects and researchLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Equol status and blood lipid profile in hyperlipidemia after consumption of diets containing soy foods

Open access
Wong, Julia MW, Kendall, Cyril WC, Marchie, Augustine, Liu, Zhen, Vidgen, Ed, Holmes, Candice, Jackson, Chung-Ja, Josse, Robert G +5 more·2012·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Recent analyses have challenged the effectiveness of soy foods as part of a cardiovascular risk reduction diet. Objective The objective of the study was to show whether equol status determines the effectiveness of soy foods to lower LDL cholesterol and to raise HDL cholesterol. Design Eighty-five hypercholesterolemic men and postmenopausal women (42 men, 43 women) participated in 1 of 3 studies that represented a range of soy interventions and that followed the same general protocol at a Canadian university hospital research center. Soy foods were provided for 1 mo at doses of 30-52 g/d for the 3 studies as follows: 1) soy foods with either high-normal (73 mg/d) or low (10 mg/d) isoflavones, 2) soy foods with or without a prebiotic to enhance colonic fermentation (10 g polyfructans/d), or 3) soy foods with a low-carbohydrate diet (26% carbohydrate). Studies 1 and 2 were randomized controlled crossover trials, and study 3 was a parallel study. Results The separation of the group into equol producers (n = 30) and nonproducers (n = 55) showed similar reductions from baseline in LDL cholesterol (-9.3 ± 2.5% and -11.1 ± 1.6%, respectively; P = 0.834), with preservation of HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I only in equol producers compared with reductions in nonproducers (HDL cholesterol: +0.9 ± 2.7% compared with -4.3 ± 1.1%, P = 0.006; apolipoprotein A-I: -1.0 ± 1.1% compared with -4.7 ± 1.0%; P = 0.011). The amount of urinary equol excreted did not relate to the c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.111.017418

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In post-menopausal women there were no significant effects on any hormone including estradiol and estrone, with a small nonsignificant 14% increase in estradiol based on 21 studies (p=0.07) and a nonsignificant decrease in estrone.

    “In post-menopausal women there were no significant effects on any hormone including estradiol and estrone, with a small nonsignificant 14% increase in estradiol based on 21 studies (p=0.07) and a nonsignificant decrease in estrone.”
  • Hooper found that soy did not significantly affect estradiol, estrone, or sex hormone binding globulin, although among pre-menopausal women there was a significant 20% decrease in LH and FSH (p=0.01, 0.5 respectively).

    “Hooper found that soy did not significantly affect estradiol, estrone, or sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), although amongst pre-menopausal women there was a significant 20% decrease in LH and FSH (p=0.01, 0.5 respectively) [31].”
  • The review's findings are in agreement with those reported by Hooper et al in a 2009 meta-analysis of 47 trials.

    “In addition, our findings are in agreement with those reported by Hooper et al in a 2009 meta analysis of 47 trials [31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, J. M., Kendall, C. W., Marchie, A., Liu, Z., Vidgen, E., Holmes, C., Jackson, C.-J., Josse, R. G., Pencharz, P. B., Rao, A. V., Vuksan, V., Singer, W., & Jenkins, D. J.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Kendall, Cyril WC
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
564-571
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112837895
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
equol, equol producers, soy products, hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, isoflavones, prebiotics, colonic fermentation, apolipoprotein A-I, low-carbohydrate diet, cardiovascular risk reduction, lipid profile, dietary intervention, postmenopausal women, men
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diet, Female, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Apolipoprotein A-I, Postmenopause, Cross-Over Studies, Soy Foods, Prebiotics, Equol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review