Cited by 177Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition and Health Studies

Self-report-based estimates of energy intake offer an inadequate basis for scientific conclusions

Open access
Schoeller, Dale A, Thomas, Diana, Archer, Edward, Heymsfield, Steven B, Blair, Steven N, Goran, Michael I, Hill, James O, Atkinson, Richard L +9 more·2013·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.113.062125

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current dietary assessment methods cannot accurately or precisely measure energy intake outside the laboratory.

    “However, current dietary assessment methods are insufficient to accurately or precisely measure energy intake outside the laboratory (Schoeller, 1990; Schoeller et al., 2013) and adherence to study diets cannot be guaranteed in free-living subjects.”

    From Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake (2019) · cites this paper as Schoeller et al., 2013

    The section “Might the reporting error have increased in recent years?” says self-reported energy-intake data have too much systematic error to track energy balance. The Conclusions also call self-reported intake fatally flawed, but identify other validated tools to develop for measuring intake in free-living people. The source therefore supports the claim about self-report methods, not its blanket statement about all current dietary assessment methods. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoeller, D. A., Thomas, D., Archer, E., Heymsfield, S. B., Blair, S. N., Goran, M. I., Hill, J. O., Atkinson, R. L., Corkey, B. E., Foreyt, J., Dhurandhar, N. V., Kral, J. G., Hall, K. D., Hansen, B. C., Heitmann, B. L., Ravussin, E., & Allison, D. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Allison, David B
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
97
Issue
6
Pages
1413-1415
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066429496
Cited by
177
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
22.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
dietary assessment, energy intake estimation, underreporting, self-report validity, energy balance
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Reproducibility of Results, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review