Cited by 48Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Machine learning modeling practices to support the principles of AI and ethics in nutrition research

Open access
Thomas, Diana M., Kleinberg, Samantha, Brown, Andrew W., Crow, Mason, Bastian, Nathaniel D., Reisweber, Nicholas, Lasater, Robert, Kendall, Thomas +6 more·2022·Nutrition & Diabetes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nutrition research is relying more on artificial intelligence and machine learning models to understand, diagnose, predict, and explain data. While artificial intelligence and machine learning models provide powerful modeling tools, failure to use careful and well-thought-out modeling processes can lead to misleading conclusions and concerns surrounding ethics and bias. METHODS: Based on our experience as reviewers and journal editors in nutrition and obesity, we identified the most frequently omitted best practices from statistical modeling and how these same practices extend to machine learning models. We next addressed areas required for implementation of machine learning that are not included in commercial software packages. RESULTS: Here, we provide a tutorial on best artificial intelligence and machine learning modeling practices that can reduce potential ethical problems with a checklist and guiding principles to aid nutrition researchers in developing, evaluating, and implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning models in nutrition research. CONCLUSION: The quality of AI/ML modeling in nutrition research requires iterative and tailored processes to mitigate against potential ethical problems or to predict conclusions that are free of bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41387-022-00226-y

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictive triage tools enable early identification of patients requiring urgent care, facilitating timely intervention.

    “Predictive triage tools also enable early identification of patients requiring urgent care, facilitating timely intervention [39].”

    From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision-Making: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications, Validation Gaps, Bias, and Deployment Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses machine learning for personalized nutrition, and the Missing data section discusses improving predictions from electronic health records. Neither addresses predictive triage, early identification of patients needing urgent care, or timely intervention. Searches for those terms found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [6]Christian B. The alignment problem: machine learning and human values, First edition. W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY; 2020.
  2. [9]Russell SJ. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. In: Norvig P, (ed). 3rd ed. ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall; 2010.
  3. [10]Buolamwini J, Gebru T. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Sorelle AF, Christo W, (eds). Proceedings of the 1st conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 2018. p. 77–91.
  4. [20]NeurIPS 2022 Paper Checklist Guidelines. In 2022.
  5. [55]Everitt B. The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. In. 3rd ed. ed. Cambridge, UK;: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  6. [80]Holzinger A, Kieseberg P, Tjoa AM, Weippl E (eds). Explainable AI: the new 42? Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. Cham. Springer International Publishing; 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, D. M., Kleinberg, S., Brown, A. W., Crow, M., Bastian, N. D., Reisweber, N., Lasater, R., Kendall, T., Shafto, P., Blaine, R., Smith, S., Ruiz, D., Morrell, C., & Clark, N.
Affiliations
  • United States Military Academy (US)
  • Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
  • Arkansas Children's Research Institute (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Diana M.
Venue
Nutrition & Diabetes
Published
2022-12-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
48-48
ISSN
2044-4052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310540378
Cited by
48
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition and Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH U54TR004279, U54TR004279, NIH R25DK099080, NIH R25GM141507, NIH R25HL124208)
  • United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (XAI FA8750-17-2-0146)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
machine learning, artificial intelligence, nutrition research, AI ethics, algorithmic bias, model evaluation, obesity research, research reproducibility, AI implementation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Nutritional Status, Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review