CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of eating rate on energy intake and hunger

Robinson, Eric, Almiron-Roig, Eva, Rutters, Femke, de Graaf, Cees, Forde, Ciarán G, Tudur Smith, Catrin, Nolan, Sarah J, Jebb, Susan A·2014·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.113.081745
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Reductions in eating rate are recommended to prevent and treat obesity; yet, the relation between eating rate and energy intake has not been systematically reviewed, with studies producing mixed results. Objective Our main objective was to examine how experimentally manipulated differences in eating rate influence concurrent energy intake and subjective hunger ratings. Design We systematically reviewed studies that experimentally manipulated eating rate and measured concurrent food intake, self-reported hunger, or both. We combined effect estimates from studies by using inverse variance meta-analysis, calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) in food intake between fast and slow eating rate conditions. Results Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion. Evidence indicated that a slower eating rate was associated with lower energy intake in comparison to a faster eating rate (random-effects SMD: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.65; P Conclusions Evidence to date supports the notion that eating rate affects energy intake. Research is needed to identify effective interventions to reduce eating rate that can be adopted in everyday life to help limit excess consumption.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.113.081745

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 1-week crossover RCT at the University of Tokyo Hospital involving nine adults with overweight or obesity, participants consumed 813 kcal/day more and had fewer chews per calorie during the UPF week compared with the non-UPF week.

    “During the UPF week, participants consumed 813 kcal/day more and had fewer chews per calorie, compared with the non-UPF week.[59][60][61][62]”

    From Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [60]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Sasaki, 2003, Self-reported rate of eating correlates with body mass index in 18-y-old Japanese women, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 27, 1405, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802425 · DOI
  2. Otsuka, 2006, Eating fast leads to obesity: findings based on self-administered questionnaires among middle-aged Japanese men and women, J Epidemiol, 16, 117, 10.2188/jea.16.117 · DOI
  3. Llewellyn, 2008, Eating rate is a heritable phenotype related to weight in children, Am J Clin Nutr, 88, 1560, 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26175 · DOI
  4. Spiegel, 1989, Responses of lean and obese subjects to preloads, deprivation, and palatability, Appetite, 13, 45, 10.1016/0195-6663(89)90026-3 · DOI
  5. Spiegel, 2000, Rate of intake, bites, and chews—the interpretation of lean-obese differences, Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 24, 229, 10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00076-7 · DOI
  6. Andrade, 2012, Does eating slowly influence appetite and energy intake when water intake is controlled?, Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 9, 135, 10.1186/1479-5868-9-135 · DOI
  7. Forde, 2013, Texture and savoury taste influences on food intake in a realistic hot lunch time meal, Appetite, 60, 180, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Scisco, 2011, Slowing bite-rate reduces energy intake: an application of the bite counter device, J Am Diet Assoc, 111, 1231, 10.1016/j.jada.2011.05.005 · DOI
  9. Liberati, 2009, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration, PLoS Med, 6, e1000100, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hogenkamp, 2010, Intake during repeated exposure to low- and high-energy dense yogurts by different means of consumption, Am J Clin Nutr, 91, 841, 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28360 · DOI
  11. Ioakimidis, 2009, A method for the control of eating rate: a potential intervention in eating disorders, Behav Res Methods, 41, 755, 10.3758/BRM.41.3.755 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Andrade, 2008, Eating slowly led to decreases in energy intake within meals in healthy women, J Am Diet Assoc, 108, 1186, 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.026 · DOI
  13. Kissileff, 2008, Effect of eating rate on binge size in bulimia nervosa, Physiol Behav, 93, 481, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.10.007 · DOI
  14. Kissileff, 1980, Universal eating monitor for continuous recording of solid or liquid consumption in man, Am J Physiol, 238, R14
  15. Martin, 2007, Slower eating rate reduces the food intake of men, but not women: implications for behavioral weight control, Behav Res Ther, 45, 2349, 10.1016/j.brat.2007.03.016 · DOI
  16. Smit, 2011, Does prolonged chewing reduce food intake? Fletcherism revisited, Appetite, 57, 295, 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.003 · DOI
  17. Spiegel, 1993, Bite size, ingestion rate, and meal size in lean and obese women, Appetite, 21, 131, 10.1016/0195-6663(93)90005-5 · DOI
  18. Weijzen, 2008, Sensory specific satiety and intake: the difference between nibble- and bar-size snacks, Appetite, 50, 435, 10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.008 · DOI
  19. Zandian, 2012, Children eat their school lunch too quickly: an exploratory study of the effect on food intake, BMC Public Health, 12, 351, 10.1186/1471-2458-12-351 · DOI
  20. Zandian, 2009, Decelerated and linear eaters: effect of eating rate on food intake and satiety, Physiol Behav, 96, 270, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.10.011 · DOI
  21. Zijlstra, 2010, The effect of texture differences on satiation in 3 pairs of solid foods, Appetite, 55, 490, 10.1016/j.appet.2010.08.014 · DOI
  22. Bolhuis, 2014, Slow food: sustained impact of food texture on energy intake over the course of the day, PLoS ONE, 9, e93370, 10.1371/journal.pone.0093370 · DOI
  23. Karl JP, Young AJ, Rood JC, Montain S. Independent and combined effects of eating rate and energy density on energy intake, appetite and gut hormones. Obesity (Epub ahead of print 16 April 2013). · DOI
  24. Karl, 2011, Eating rate during a fixed-portion meal does not affect postprandial appetite and gut peptides or energy intake during a subsequent meal, Physiol Behav, 102, 524, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.007 · DOI
  25. Kokkinos, 2010, Eating slowly increases the postprandial response of the anorexigenic gut hormones, peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide-1, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 95, 333, 10.1210/jc.2009-1018 · DOI
  26. Rigamonti, 2013, Anorexigenic postprandial responses of PYY and GLP1 to slow ice cream consumption: preservation in obese adolescents, but not in obese adults, Eur J Endocrinol, 168, 429, 10.1530/EJE-12-0867 · DOI
  27. Zhu, 2013, Increasing the number of masticatory cycles is associated with reduced appetite and altered postprandial plasma concentrations of gut hormones, insulin and glucose, Br J Nutr, 110, 384, 10.1017/S0007114512005053 · DOI
  28. Cassady, 2009, Mastication of almonds: effects of lipid bioaccessibility, appetite and hormone response, Am J Clin Nutr, 89, 794, 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26669 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Urbain, 1989, The two-component stomach: effects of meal particle size on fundal and antral emptying, Eur J Nucl Med, 15, 254, 10.1007/BF00257543 · DOI
  30. Forde, 2013, Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation, Appetite, 60, 208, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.015 · DOI
  31. Weijzen, 2009, Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation, Br J Nutr, 102, 1091, 10.1017/S000711450932574X · DOI
  32. Bolhuis, 2011, Both longer oral sensory exposure to and higher intensity of saltiness decrease ad libitum food intake in healthy normal-weight men, J Nutr, 141, 2242, 10.3945/jn.111.143867 · DOI
  33. Bolhuis, 2013, Consumption with large sip size increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed, PLoS ONE, 8, e53288, 10.1371/journal.pone.0053288 · DOI
  34. Bolhuis, 2014, Both a higher number of sips and a longer oral transmit time reduce ad libitum intake, Food Qual Prefer, 32, 234, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.001 · DOI
  35. Li, 2011, Improvement in chewing activity reduces energy intake in one meal and modulates plasma hut hormone concentrations in obese and lean young Chinese men, Am J Clin Nutr, 94, 709, 10.3945/ajcn.111.015164 · DOI
  36. Mahoney, 1975, The obese eating style: bites, beliefs, and behavior modification, Addict Behav, 1, 47, 10.1016/S0306-4603(75)80017-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, E., Almiron-Roig, E., Rutters, F., de Graaf, C., Forde, C. G., Tudur Smith, C., Nolan, S. J., & Jebb, S. A.
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
123-151
ISSN
0002-9165
DOI
10.3945/ajcn.113.081745
Cited by
328
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
UK Medical Research Council Programme (U105960389)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review