The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic Supply Function Competition With Private Information
Open accessAbstract
A finite number of sellers (n) compete in schedules to supply an elastic demand. The cost of each seller is random, with common and private value components, and the seller receives a private signal about it. A Bayesian supply function equilibrium is characterized: The equilibrium is privately revealing and the incentives to rely on private signals are preserved. Supply functions are steeper with higher correlation among the cost parameters. For high (positive) correlation, supply functions are downward sloping, price is above the Cournot level, and as we approach the common value case, price tends to the collusive level. As correlation becomes maximally negative, we approach the competitive outcome. With positive correlation, private information coupled with strategic behavior induces additional distortionary market power above full information levels. Efficiency can be restored with appropriate subsidy schemes or with a precise enough public signal about the common value component. As the market grows large with the number of sellers, the equilibrium becomes price-taking, bid shading is on the order of 1/n, and the order of magnitude of welfare losses is 1/n2. The results extend to inelastic demand, demand uncertainty, and demand schedule competition. A range of applications in product and financial markets is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding
Milgrom, P. R., & Weber, R. J. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911865 · Cited by 3,753
On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets
Stiglitz, J. E., & Grossman, S. J. (1980) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8765r99 · Cited by 3,645
The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management
Talluri, K. T., & Van Ryzin, G. J. (2004) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/b139000 · Cited by 2,243
Social Value of Public Information
Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024610 · Cited by 1,967
Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty
Klemperer, P. D., & Meyer, M. A. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913707 · Cited by 1,382
Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market
Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. (1992) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261846 · Cited by 1,336
Menu Auctions, Resource Allocation, and Economic Influence
Bernheim, B. D., & Whinston, M. D. (1986) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884639 · Cited by 1,223
Informed Speculation with Imperfect Competition
Kyle, A. S. (1989) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297551 · Cited by 963
The Strategic Choice of Managerial Incentives
Sklivas, S. D. (1987) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555609 · Cited by 959
Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market
Borenstein, S., Bushnell, J. B., & Wolak, F. A. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024557 · Cited by 941
Metadata
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1919-1966
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122505440
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 19.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic Supply Function Competition With Private Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3982/ecta8126
- The paper
- Strategic Supply Function Competition With Private Information. (2011). Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta8126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.