The line makes the difference: line managers as effective HRM partners
Open accessAbstract
The HR role of line managers is highly discussed and criticized but little empirically researched. It is argued that line managers are not able to effectively implement HR practices because they do not have the desire, capacity and competences needed to perform well and lack support and policies & procedures to effectively implement HRM on the work floor. This thesis did measure the effect of these five constraints on line managers’ HR implementation effectiveness by first identifying the relevant HR constraints for the line management by interviews, then developing a research instrument to measure the five constraints and finally to measure the effect of these constraints on line managers’ HR implementation effectiveness, taking organisational differences into consideration. Subordinates evaluated their line manager’s HR implementation as effective. However, the more motivated line managers are to perform HR practices, the worse they are perceived in performing such tasks on the work floor. When being motivated to execute HR the way they should, line managers stick to HR guidelines and rules and hence lack the necessary room for maneuver and freedom in applying HR practices according to their own benefits. Somewhat surprisingly, only line managers’ HR-related competences increased the effectiveness of HR implementation, while their capacity, support and policy & procedures did not significantly affect HR implementation effectiveness. Although case studies have identified five factors that can contribute to explaining the ineffectiveness of line managers when it comes to HR implementation, in fact these factors, with the exception of the line managers’ self-perceived competences, by and large do not explain or predict line management effectiveness. The research contributes to important discussions in theory and practice by empirically testing a widely-recognized problem in various organizations and by providing clear advice for organisations and HR departments on how to improve their performance. It is a ‘must read’ for HR managers and line managers alike.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Line managers are crucial actors with the responsibility of directly managing employees, and more work has been devolved to them over the past few years, although the evidence for that devolution is slim.
“Line managers are crucial actors with the responsibility of directly managing employees (Bos-Nehles, 2010;Brewster, Gollan, & Wright, 2014;Wright & Nishii, 2013) and, it is argued, more work being devolved to them over the past few years, although the evidence for that is slim (Brewster et al., 2015).”
From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as Bos-Nehles, 2010
Line managers can be divided into middle-level and front-line managers; front-line managers have direct supervisory responsibility, whereas middle managers coordinate an organisational unit's day-to-day activities.
“'Line managers' themselves can be divided into middle-level and front-line managers (Bos-Nehles, 2010).The latter have direct supervisory responsibility, whereas middle managers are responsible for the coordination of an organisational unit's day-to-day activities.”
From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as Bos-Nehles, 2010
The available Abstract discusses line managers’ role in implementing HR practices, but does not distinguish middle-level from front-line managers or define their responsibilities. Searches for the proposed division and for coordination of an organisational unit’s day-to-day activities found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666 · see citing works
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193 · see citing works
Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…HR role effectively (Bond & Wise, 2003; Gennard & Kelly, 1997; McConville & Holden, 1999; Whittaker & Marchington, 2003); and (5) they require clear policies & procedures concerning their HR responsibilities and how to apply them (Bowen & Ostroff, 2004; Brewster & Larsen, 2000; McConville, 2006).”
BackgroundGuay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1005614228250 · Cited by 1,579 · see citing works
NISHII, L. H., LEPAK, D. P., & SCHNEIDER, B. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x · Cited by 880 · see citing works
I-Deals: Idiosyncratic Terms in Employment Relationships
Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527470 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research
Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
The mediating role of affect in the relationship between need satisfaction and autonomous motivation
Vandercammen, L., Hofmans, J., & Theuns, P. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12032 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bos-Nehles, A. C.
- Corresponding author
- Bos-Nehles, Anna C.
- ORCID
- Bos-Nehles, Anna C.
- Published
- 2010-04-29
- OpenAlex
- W2166133630
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.utwente.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Keywords
- line managers, HRM implementation, subordinate perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review