Cited by 14Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Health Website Success: User Engagement in Health-Related Websites

Open access
Imlawi, Jehad·2017·International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)

Abstract

Health-related websites are increasingly accessed on the Internet. More online users are using health-related websites, and rely on it to get answers for their health questions. Health care providers try to develop websites that focus on the users’ needs. One of the key factors, to develop users' driven health-related websites, is supporting users’ engagement. This study proposes a research model that investigates factors that are critical to users’ engagement in health-related websites. Three factors were identified accordingly; website usability, website interactivity, and users' perceived health information quality. A limited amount of research has previously explored such a thorough list. 240 respondents participated in an online survey, to test the research model. Results show that the engagement antecedents identified by the study are significant, and explain a great percentage of the variance for the engagement. The study concluded by implications for theory and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3991/ijim.v11i6.6959

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a paucity of peer-reviewed research published regarding mHealth apps to determine their uptake, impact, or best practices for development and regulation.

    “More importantly, there is a paucity of peer-reviewed research published regarding mHealth apps to determine their uptake, impact, or the best practices for their development and regulation [12,30,37].”

    From Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Abstract and Introduction discuss limited research on engagement and usability in health-related websites. Searches for mHealth apps, uptake, impact, and regulation found no passage addressing whether peer-reviewed research on those topics is scarce. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The limited number of research studies and agencies available to regulate mHealth apps impacts the ability to meet the current needs of this rapidly expanding industry.

    “When considering the use and development of mHealth apps, the limited number of research studies and agencies available to regulate this field impacts the ability to meet the current needs of this rapidly expanding industry [12,37].”

    From Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction and Discussion and Implications address research gaps and user engagement in health-related websites, not regulation of mHealth apps. Searches for app regulation, oversight agencies, and limited research in that field found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • HCPs have a responsibility to advocate for best practices, which is challenging with mHealth because of the high rate of app development and the inability of evidence-based practice to keep up.

    “HCPs have a responsibility to advocate for best practices; this can be challenging with mHealth because of the high rate of app development and the inability for evidence-based practice to keep up [12,30,37].”

    From Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction and Discussion and Implications address health-website usability, information quality, and user engagement. Searches for rapid app development, evidence-based practice, and HCPs’ duty to advocate for best practices found no passage addressing the attributed claim. The copy is about websites, not the stated challenge with mHealth apps. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Jacques, R., Preece, J. & Carey, T. (1995). Engagement as a design concept for hyperme- dia. Canadian Journal of Educational Communications 24(1), pp.49-59.
  2. Wu, G. (1999). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward web sites. In Proceedings of the conference-American Academy of Advertising (pp. 254-262). American Academy of Ad- vertising.
  3. Green, D. and Pearson, J.M., (2006). Development of a website usability instrument based on ISO 9241-Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47 (1), 66-72.
  4. Tarafdar, M., & Zhang, J. (2005). Analyzing the influence of web site design parameters on web site usabilityInformation Resources Management Journal, 18(4), 62.
  5. Thakur, R., & Summey, J. H. (2007). e-Trust: Empirical insights into influential anteced- ents. Marketing Management Journal, 17(2), 67-80.
  6. Hill, A. (2001), Top 5 Reasons Your Customers Abandon Their Shopping Carts. Ziff Da- vis Smart Business for the New Economy, 14(3), pp. 80-85.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imlawi, J.
Corresponding author
Imlawi, Jehad
Venue
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)
Published
2017-11-27
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
49
ISSN
1865-7923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768387735
Cited by
14
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
user engagement, website usability, website interactivity, online health information seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review