Cited by 482Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Marketing and Social Media

The role of satisfaction and website usability in developing customer loyalty and positive word-of-mouth in the e-banking services

Casaló, Luis V., Flavián, Carlos, Guinalíu, Miguel·2008·International Journal of Bank Marketing

Abstract

Purpose Customer loyalty and positive word‐of‐mouth (WOM) have been traditionally two main goals aimed at by managers. Focusing on the online banking, the importance of these concepts is even greater due to the increasing competence in electronic commerce. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to characterize both concepts in the e‐banking context. Design/methodology/approach The influence of satisfaction and website usability in developing customer loyalty and positive WOM in the e‐banking business were measured. After the validation of measurement scales, hypotheses are contrasted through structural modelling. Findings This research showed that satisfaction with previous interactions with the bank website had a positive effect on both customer loyalty and positive WOM. In addition, website usability was found to have a positive effect on customer satisfaction and, as expected, loyalty was also significantly related to positive WOM. Practical implications In order to develop customer loyalty and positive WOM, banks that operate in the internet should: prioritize ease‐of‐use in website development, and identify the needs of online customers (e.g. in terms of services offered) in order to offer them what they really want. Originality/value Although the increasing competitiveness in e‐business is motivating an exponential growth in the number of studies that analyze loyalty development and WOM in the internet, there is still a lack of studies that analyze the formation of both concepts in the e‐banking context. Thus, this work represents a new contribution to the field of online banking, which has acquired a notable popularity in recent years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02652320810902433

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M.
Affiliations
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-09-05
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
399-417
ISSN
0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081885556
Cited by
482
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
20.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Bank Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
customer satisfaction, website usability, customer loyalty, word of mouth, electronic banking, internet banking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review