Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Japoto: sitio manteño residencial de la costa central de Manabí

Bouchard, Jean-François·2010·Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines

Abstract

Este artículo resume los principales resultados de las excavaciones hechas en el sitio manteño de Japoto (Periodo de Integración) y hace hincapié en su importancia, al afianzar la hipótesis sostenida desde los inicios del proyecto. Muchos de los vestigios encontrados evidencian actividades domésticas, mientras otros sugieren que parte de la población residente perteneció a la élite de un cacicazgo (señorío, jefatura), cuya sede fue Japoto.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4000/bifea.1709

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The process of organic growth is common with other well-known sites such as Japotó and Ligüiqui, which show reuse of the same areas and continuity of some settlements at least since the Guangala period (500-600 BC).

    “Es un proceso común con otros yacimientos bien conocidos como Japotó (Bouchard, 2010) o Ligüiqui (Castro & Olmo, 2019), que señalan la reutilización de las mismas áreas y la continuidad de algunos asentamientos, al menos desde el periodo Guangala (500 a.C.-600 a.C.) (Fabier et. al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.4000/bifea.3615 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Delabarde, T., 2006 – Una secuencia de patrones funerarios manteños en la provincia de Manabí. Primeros resultados de la tola J (7 (Japoto). Bulletin de l', Institut Français d'Études Andines, 35 (3): 313-320. · DOI
  3. Noriega, A., 2007 – El intercambio de Spondylus a lo largo de la costa sudamericana de acuerdo al registro arqueológico. In: II Congreso ecuatoriano de antropología y arqueología (S. García Serrano, ed.): 433-460; Quito: Abya-Yala.
  4. Saville, M., 1907 – The antiquities of Ecuador, vol. 1; New York: Heye Museum. · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.4000/bifea.3640 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bouchard, J.-F.
Venue
Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines
Publisher
OpenEdition
Published
2010
Volume
39 (3)
Pages
479-501
ISSN
  • 0303-7495
  • 2076-5827
Cited by
5
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review