Cited by 16Digital literacy in educationArtificial Intelligence in EducationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Systematic Approach to Questionnaire Development and Validation

Open access
Ranieri, Maria, Biagini, Gabriele, Cuomo, Stefano·2025·International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence

Abstract

This paper presents the development, refinement, and validation of the Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale, an instrument designed to measure artificial intelligence literacy across four dimensions: knowledge-related, operational, critical, and ethical. The initial version of the questionnaire, based on a robust theoretical framework and expert consultation, included 40 items and was tested with 57 doctoral students. It demonstrated strong psychometric properties (comparative fit index = 0.946, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.92) but showed limitations such as item redundancy (α = 0.947) and low performance of general items. To address these issues, the questionnaire was refined to a concise 24-item version. The revised instrument was evaluated using a sample of 314 first-year student teachers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed a four-factor structure, with each dimension demonstrating strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.838 to 0.912) and excellent model fit indices (comparative fit index = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation = 0.0441). The results validate the Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale as a reliable and efficient tool for assessing artificial intelligence literacy in educational settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/ijdldc.388469

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ranieri et al. developed the Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale across knowledge-related, operational, critical, and ethical dimensions.

    “Ranieri et al. (2025) developed the Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale across knowledgerelated, operational, critical, and ethical dimensions”

    From From AI Literacy to AI Fluency: A Developmental Framework for Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Ranieri et al., 2025

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranieri, M., Biagini, G., & Cuomo, S.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Venue
International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence
Published
2025-09-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-25
ISSN
  • 1947-3494 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-3508
OpenAlex
W4414116539
Cited by
15
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 2
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
ng
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
AI literacy, scale development, psychometric validation, university students, doctoral students, AI knowledge, AI ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review