Cited by 64Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Stop the Noise: A Quality Improvement Project to Decrease Electrocardiographic Nuisance Alarms

Sendelbach, Sue, Wahl, Sharon, Anthony, Anita, Shotts, Pam·2015·Critical Care Nurse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As many as 99% of alarm signals may not need any intervention and can result in patients’ deaths. Alarm management is now a Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goal. OBJECTIVES: To reduce the number of nuisance electrocardiographic alarm signals in adult patients on the medical cardiovascular care unit. METHODS: A quality improvement process was used that included eliminating duplicative alarms, customizing alarms, changing electrocardiography electrodes daily, standardizing skin preparation, and using disposable electrocardiography leads. RESULTS: In the cardiovascular care unit, the mean number of electrocardiographic alarm signals per day decreased from 28.5 (baseline) to 3.29, an 88.5% reduction. CONCLUSION: Use of a bundled approach to managing alarm signals decreased the mean number of alarm signals in a cardiovascular care unit. (Critical Care Nurse. 2015;35[4]:15–23)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4037/ccn2015858

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduction of alarms due to alarm management strategies ranges from 24% to 88.5% per ICU, indicating effectiveness of such strategies, including staff training for any ward that uses patient monitoring devices.

    “Notably, the reduction of alarms due to alarm management strategies ranges from 24% to 88.5% per ICU, indicating the effectiveness of such strategies, including staff training for any ward that uses patient monitoring devices [32-34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sendelbach, S., Wahl, S., Anthony, A., & Shotts, P.
Affiliations
Abbott Northwestern Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Sendelbach, Sue
Venue
Critical Care Nurse
Published
2015-08-01
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
15-22
ISSN
  • 0279-5442 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-8250
OpenAlex
W1915812629
Cited by
64
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Nurse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Creations of Advanced Catalytic Transformation for the Sustainable Manufacturing at Low Energy, Low Environmental Load
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
nuisance alarms, alarm management, patient safety, quality improvement, skin preparation, medical-surgical nursing
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrocardiography, Equipment Failure, Humans, Clinical Alarms, Quality Improvement, Patient Safety, Critical Care Nursing, Patient Care Bundles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review