The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activity of α- and θ-Defensins against Primary Isolates of HIV-1
Open accessAbstract
θ-Defensins are lectin-like, cyclic octadecapeptides found in the leukocytes of nonhuman primates. They are also homologues of the more familiar α-defensins expressed by humans and certain other mammals. This study compares the ability of six θ-defensins (hominid retrocyclins 1–3 and rhesus θ-defensins 1–3) and four human α-defensins (human neutrophil peptides (HNPs) 1–4) to bind gp120 and CD4. In addition, we compared the ability of these θ-defensins and HNP-1 to protect J53-BL cells (an indicator cell line) from primary HIV-1 isolates that varied in subtype and coreceptor usage. The most potent θ-defensin, retrocyclin-2, bound with exceptionally high affinity to gp120 (KD, 9.4 nM) and CD4 (KD, 6.87 nM), and its effectiveness against subtype B isolates (IC50, 1.05 ± 0.28 μg/ml; 520 ± 139 nM) was approximately twice as great as that of HNP-1 on a molar basis. We also show, for the first time, that human α-defensins, HNPs 1–3, are lectins that bind with relatively high affinity to gp120 (KD range, 15.8–52.8 nM) and CD4 (KD range, 8.0–34.9 nM). Proteins found in human and FBS bound exogenous HNP-2 and retrocyclin-1, and competed with their ability to bind gp120. However, even the low concentrations of α-defensins found in normal human serum suffice to bind over half of the gp120 spikes on HIV-1 and a higher percentage of cell surface CD4 molecules. Although this report principally concerns the relationship between carbohydrate-binding and the antiviral properties of α- and θ-defensins, the lectin-like behavior of defensins may contribute to many other activities of these multifunctional peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Retraction of an interpretation
Murch, S. H., Anthony, A., Casson, D. H., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A. P., Thomson, M. A., Valentine, A., Davies, S. E., & Walker-Smith, J. A. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15715-2 · Cited by 321
RetractedDefensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity
Ganz, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1180 · Cited by 3,066
Cited by
Antimicrobial host defence peptides: functions and clinical potential
Mookherjee, N., Anderson, M. A., Haagsman, H. P., & Davidson, D. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0058-8 · Cited by 1,502
A Review of Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Therapeutic Potential as Anti-Infective Drugs
Gordon, Y. J., Romanowski, E. G., & McDermott, A. M. (2005) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1080/02713680590968637 · Cited by 697
Defensins in innate antiviral immunity
Klotman, M. E., & Chang, T. L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1860 · Cited by 471
Lehrer, R. I. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro976 · Cited by 448
Self-citationThe vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology
Smith, S. B., & Ravel, J. (2017) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp271694 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W., Owen, S. M., Rudolph, D. L., Cole, A. M., Hong, T., Waring, A. J., Lal, R. B., & Lehrer, R. I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 515-520
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1522034611
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity of α- and θ-Defensins against Primary Isolates of HIV-1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.515
- The paper
- Wang, W., Owen, S. M., Rudolph, D. L., Cole, A. M., Hong, T., Waring, A. J., Lal, R. B., & Lehrer, R. I. (2004). Activity of α- and θ-Defensins against Primary Isolates of HIV-1. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.