Cited by 186Family Dynamics and RelationshipsReproductive Health and ContraceptionGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The High Fertility of College Educated Women in Norway: An Artefact of the Separate Modelling of Each Parity Transition

Open access
Kravdal, Øystein·2001·Demographic Research

Abstract

College education has a positive impact on birth rates, net of age and duration since previous birth, according to models estimated separately for second and third births. There are also indications of such effects on first-birth rates, in the upper 20

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4054/demres.2001.5.6

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have drawn attention to the potential impact of unobserved characteristics on the association between education and parity progression to higher-order births, but only a few studies have attempted to control for such selectivity.

    “Whereas several studies have drawn attention to the potential impact of unobserved characteristics on the association between education and parity progression to higher-order births, only a few studies have attempted to control for such selectivity (Kravdal 2001;Kreyenfeld 2002;Kravdal 2007;Jenkins 2011).”
  • To the extent that educational groups are unequally selected into motherhood, the unequal distribution of unobserved characteristics by educational group may affect educational differentials for second and third birth progression.

    “To the extent that educational groups are unequally selected into motherhood, the unequal distribution of unobserved characteristics by educational group may affect educational differentials for second and third birth progression (Kravdal 2001).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Santow, G and M. Bracher. (2001). "Deferment of first birth and fluctuating fertility in Sweden." European Journal of Population 17: 343-363.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kravdal, Ø.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Kravdal, Øystein
Venue
Demographic Research
Published
2001-12-11
Volume
5
Pages
187-216
ISSN
1435-9871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062909467
Cited by
186
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Demographic Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
university education, fertility, educational attainment, birth rate, second birth, third births, first birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review