The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Issues in Outcomes Research: An Overview of Randomization Techniques for Clinical Trials
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To review and describe randomization techniques used in clinical trials, including simple, block, stratified, and covariate adaptive techniques. Background: Clinical trials are required to establish treatment efficacy of many athletic training procedures. In the past, we have relied on evidence of questionable scientific merit to aid the determination of treatment choices. Interest in evidence-based practice is growing rapidly within the athletic training profession, placing greater emphasis on the importance of well-conducted clinical trials. One critical component of clinical trials that strengthens results is random assignment of participants to control and treatment groups. Although randomization appears to be a simple concept, issues of balancing sample sizes and controlling the influence of covariates a priori are important. Various techniques have been developed to account for these issues, including block, stratified randomization, and covariate adaptive techniques. Advantages: Athletic training researchers and scholarly clinicians can use the information presented in this article to better conduct and interpret the results of clinical trials. Implementing these techniques will increase the power and validity of findings of athletic medicine clinical trials, which will ultimately improve the quality of care provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“First of all, one of the limitations may be the selected randomization method which was chosen to simply control balance across groups over time for a sample size of 60 participants. As published data suggest, the 6-block randomization method may not be optimal for randomization, as blocks are best used in smaller increments due to easier balance control. Therefore, the 4-block randomization”
From Early Occupational Therapy Intervention post-stroke (EOTIPS): A randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [69]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
Pocock, S. J., & Simon, R. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529712 · Cited by 2,350
The Arrangement of Field Experiments
Fisher, R. A. (1992) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_8 · Cited by 977
Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07750-4 · Cited by 923
Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups
Taves, D. R. (1974) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt1974155443 · Cited by 891
Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced
EFRON, B. (1971) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.403 · Cited by 873
Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07683-3 · Cited by 774
The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials
Scott, N. W., McPherson, G. C., Ramsay, C. R., & Campbell, M. K. (2002) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00242-8 · Cited by 651
Statistics notes: How to randomise
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7211.703 · Cited by 506
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Altman, D. G. and J. M.Bland. How to randomise.BMJ1999. 319 (7211):703–704.
- Blair, E. Gold is not always good enough: the shortcomings of randomization when evaluating interventions in small heterogeneous samples. J Clin Epidemiol 2004. 57 (12):1219–1222.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 552
Ciccaglione, A. F., Cellini, L., Grossi, L., et al. (2015) · Helicobacter · doi:10.1111/hel.12209 · Cited by 25
Effectiveness of training before unsedated MRI scans in young children: a randomized control trial
Fletcher, S., Lardner, D. R. R., Bagshawe, M., et al. (2023) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-023-05647-0 · Cited by 25
“Participants were randomized using covariate adaptive randomization [20, 21] to balance age and sex among groups.”
MethodBalancing multiple baseline characteristics in randomized clinical trials
Su, Z. (2011) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2011.03.004 · Cited by 25
“[7] and Kao et al.”
Yamanouchi, Y., Sukegawa, T., Inagaki, A., Inada, T., Yoshio, T., Yoshimura, R., & Iwata, N. (2014) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyu016 · Cited by 25
“Simple randomization is thought to keep the quality of both groups even, but the chance exists that the number of participants in the groups will become uneven with a total enrollment of less than 100 subjects (Kang et al., 2008).”
BackgroundTransfer after process-based object-location memory training in healthy older adults.
Zimmermann, K., von Bastian, C. C., Röcke, C., Martin, M., & Eschen, A. (2016) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000123 · Cited by 28
Arts, L. P. J., van de Poll-Franse, L. V., van den Berg, S. W., Prins, J. B., Husson, O., Mols, F., Brands‐Nijenhuis, A. V. M., Tick, L. W., & Oerlemans, S. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1943-2 · Cited by 26
“The randomisation will be performed by a computer randomisation program which will ensure a balance in sample size across groups over time [29].”
MethodReducing Risk Behavior with Family-Centered Prevention During the Young Adult Years
Stormshak, E. A., Caruthers, A. S., Chronister, K. M., DeGarmo, D. S., Stapleton, J., Falkenstein, C. A., Devargas, E. C., & Nash, W. A. (2018) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-018-0917-2 · Cited by 27
“Overallocation retains randomization of sample characteristics across conditions (Dumville et al. 2006; Kang et al. 2008) with no threats of selection bias under conditions of equal attrition.”
Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies: Retraction
(2015) · Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.4103/0974-1208.165154 · Cited by 24
RetractedEnergy costs and performance of transfemoral amputees and non-amputees during walking and running
Mengelkoch, L. J., Kahle, J. T., & Highsmith, M. J. (2016) · Prosthetics and Orthotics International · doi:10.1177/0309364616677650 · Cited by 24
der Oord, S. V., Boyer, B. E., Dyck, L. V., MacKay, K. J., Meyer, H. D., & Baeyens, D. (2018) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054718787033 · Cited by 24
Bates, M. E., Lesnewich, L. M., Uhouse, S. G., Gohel, S., & Buckman, J. F. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00624 · Cited by 25
“Failures of randomization in small samples are common (86), and future studies may benefit from selecting participants with high levels of self-reported craving and/or matching on craving levels across intervention groups.”
BackgroundFlocke, S. A., Step, M. M., Antognoli, E., Lawson, P. J., Smith, S., Jackson, B., Krejci, S. A., Parran, T. V., & Marsh, S. (2014) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.020 · Cited by 22
“Covariate adaptive randomization (Kang et al., 2008) was used to balance clinician gender and healthcare system affiliation when assigning clinicians to receive the TMCP intervention for smoking cessation (n=16) or an attention control consisting of a multimedia educational resource for colon…”
MethodHe, Q., Wang, L., Peng, C., et al. (2018) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1177/2050640618804729 · Cited by 22
Kurt, S. M., & Çalışkan, M. K. (2018) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.12931 · Cited by 22
Mao, J. J., & Peck, K. L. (2013) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-06-2013-0003 · Cited by 22
Grischott, T. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0551-5 · Cited by 22
Aissa, S., Knaz, A., Maatoug, J., Khedher, A., Benzarti, W., Abdelghani, A., Garrouche, A., Hayouni, A., Benzarti, M., Gargouri, I., et al. (2020) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2020/1031845 · Cited by 21
“The sample size was estimated using a predictive formula [25], detailed in Appendix A .”
MethodSouissi, A., Dergaa, I., Chtourou, H., & Saad, H. B. (2022) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/15579883211070383 · Cited by 20
“The sample size was calculated according to the following formula (Kang et al., 2008): N = Zα2 s2/d2, where “s” is the standard deviation (SD = 0.”
MethodInfluentialMotei, D. E., Beteri, B., Hepsomali, P., Tzortzis, G., Vulevic, J., & Costabile, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1273861 · Cited by 19
Lecce, E., Romagnoli, R., Frinolli, G., Felici, F., Piacentini, M. F., & Bazzucchi, I. (2024) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-024-05604-1 · Cited by 20
“…involved were between the first and second weeks of the general preparatory period for track and field or weightlifting and randomly distributed between the two intervention groups in equal sample size by adopting the block-randomization approach, ensuring equal number per group (Kang et al. 2008).”
Black stain and dental caries in primary teeth of Tunisian preschool children
Elelmi, Y., Mabrouk, R., Masmoudi, F., et al. (2020) · European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry · doi:10.1007/s40368-020-00549-3 · Cited by 19
Henriksen, J. L., Sørensen, N. B., Fink, T., et al. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9122545 · Cited by 19
“However, as a large study population can be difficult to muster, due to the incidence of burn wounds, it should be remembered that sample size and covariates must be balanced, especially in smaller clinical trials [54,55].”
BackgroundPlank, A., Rushton, A. B., Ping, Y., Mei, R., Falla, D., & Heneghan, N. R. (2021) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04251-3 · Cited by 20
Study designs in medical research and their key characteristics
Nowak, D. J. (2024) · Journal of Medical Science · doi:10.20883/medical.e928 · Cited by 22
Life Adaptation Skills Training (LAST) for persons with depression: A randomized controlled study
Chen, Y.-L., Pan, A., Hsiung, P., Chung, L., Lai, J., Gau, S. S., & Chen, T.-J. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.022 · Cited by 24
“numbers placed in sealed envelopes (Kang et al., 2008; Portney and Watkins, 2009).”
MethodAl-Rawhani, A. H., Gawdat, S. I., & Amin, S. A. W. (2020) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.008 · Cited by 20
Early Occupational Therapy Intervention post-stroke (EOTIPS): A randomized controlled trial
García-Pérez, P., Rodríguez-Martínez, M. C., Gallardo-Tur, A., Blanco-Reina, E., de la Cruz-Cosme, C., & Lara, J. P. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308800 · Cited by 19
“Therefore, the 4-block randomization method could have been a more optimal technique to use for this study [69].”
Koletsi, D., Pandis, N., Polychronopoulou, A., & Eliades, T. (2012) · Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.05.002 · Cited by 18
“Such inappropriate randomization schemes have been associated with biased results.(4-15) The random number generation is usually produced using random tables or software algorithms capable of producing random sequences.”
BackgroundAhmed, Y. E., Emara, R. S., Sarhan, S. M., Boghdadi, R. M. E., El‐Bayoumi, M. A. A., El‐Far, H. M. M., Sabet, N. E., Nasr, H. M. A. E., Gawdat, S. I., & Amin, S. A. W. (2020) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.13328 · Cited by 19
Harrison, E. C., Haussler, A. M., Tueth, L. E., Baudendistel, S. T., & Earhart, G. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1289368 · Cited by 18
Lecce, E., Amoruso, P., Vecchio, A. D., Casolo, A., Felici, F., Farina, D., & Bazzucchi, I. (2025) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp288954 · Cited by 20
Methodology and Application of Adaptive and Sequential Approaches in Contemporary Clinical Trials
Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., Cui, Y., & Kowalski, J. (2012) · Journal of Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1155/2012/527351 · Cited by 18
Making sense out of the tonsillectomy literature
Mink, J. W., Shaha, S. H., & Brodsky, L. S. (2009) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.02.022 · Cited by 18
Incapacity, Handicap, and Oxidative Stress Markers of Male Smokers With and Without COPD
Moussa, S. B., Rouatbi, S., & Saad, H. B. (2016) · Respiratory Care · doi:10.4187/respcare.04420 · Cited by 18
Rejeb, H., Khelifa, M. B., Abdallah, J. B., Mrad, S., Rejeb, M. B., Hayouni, A., Benzarti, M., Limem, K., Kortas, M., Rouatbi, S., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/1557988318794304 · Cited by 18
Kuliński, K., Waśko, M. K., Tramś, E., et al. (2023) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465221149738 · Cited by 17
“552 Female 9 (56):3 (19):0 (0) 3 (25):0 (0):0 (0) .”
Khemiss, M., Khélifa, M. B., & Saad, H. B. (2017) · Libyan Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1080/19932820.2017.1289651 · Cited by 17
“The sample size was estimated using the following formula:[30]: N = [(Zα/2) 2 × P × (1 – P) × D]/E(2); where P”
MethodThe Cognitive Ageing, Nutrition and Neurogenesis (CANN) trial: Design and progress
Irvine, M. A., Scholey, A. B., King, R., Gillings, R., Vauzour, D., DeMichele, S. J., Das, T., Wesnes, K. A., Sutton, B. P., Cassidy, A., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.001 · Cited by 19
“3) using a randomization algorithm (Covariate Adaptive Randomization software [53]), with groups stratified by APOE genotype (E4 carrier vs.”
MethodEbrahimpour‐Koujan, S., Sohrabpour, A. A., Foroughi, F., et al. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3241-7 · Cited by 17
Barragan, A. A., Bas, S., Hovingh, E., et al. (2021) · JDS Communications · doi:10.3168/jdsc.2020-0047 · Cited by 17
“, primiparous = 77 (ASA = 39; UNT = 38); multiparous = 169 (ASA = 82; UNT = 87)] and assigned them randomly (simple randomization method, flipping the coin; Kang et al., 2008) to 2 groups: (1) ASA (n = 121): cows received 2 treatments with acetylsalicylic acid (4 boluses of 480 grain, estimated average dose per BW = 2…”
MethodDrug-drug interaction between crizotinib and entecavir via renal secretory transporter OCT2
Shu, W., Ma, L., Hu, X., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105153 · Cited by 17
Stavrinos, G., Iliadou, V., Pavlou, M., & Bamiou, D. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00904 · Cited by 18
Olafsson, J., Lai, X., Landsend, E. C. S., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01899-8 · Cited by 16
Dalir, Z., Seddighi, F., Esmaily, H., Tashnizi, M. A., & Tabriz, E. R. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53544-9 · Cited by 17
“Next, based on the order of patients’ arrival, they were assigned to either group A (intervention) or group B (control) 30 .”
MethodSchwartz, B., Kapellusch, J. M., Schrempf, A., Probst, K., Haller, M., & Baca, A. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3271-y · Cited by 20
“1) by means of a covariate adaptive randomization [30].”
MethodOerlemans, S., Arts, L. P. J., Kieffer, J. M., Prins, J. B., Hoogendoorn, M., van der Poel, M., Koster, A., Lensen, C., Stevens, W. B. C., Issa, D. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/27886 · Cited by 16
“Randomization was performed using block randomization to ensure a balance in sample size across arms over time [27].”
Kuo, C., Lin, C., Lin, S., Yang, Y., Chang, C., & Chen, C. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12085 · Cited by 16
Zouari, H., Latiri, I., Mahjoub, M., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/1557988317734131 · Cited by 16
Cheung, E. O., Barsuk, J. H., Mitra, D. L., Gannotta, R. J., Horowitz, B., Didwania, A. K., & Victorson, D. E. (2020) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2019.0209 · Cited by 19
“46,47 Strengths of the current research include its coapplication of both simulation and mindfulness-based training for interns.”
Wang, P.-C., Rajput, D., Wang, X., Huang, C., & Chen, C. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-57649-z · Cited by 15
“To mitigate potential confounding effects of order, the three experiments were randomized using the simple randomization method 30 .”
MethodAmato, A., Proia, P., Alioto, A., Rossi, C., Pagliaro, A., Ragonese, P., Schirò, G., Salemi, G., Caldarella, R., Vasto, S., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66448-5 · Cited by 17
“A Stratified Randomization 33 with the sex of the participants considered as a stratification factor was used for randomization process.”
MethodPearson, N., Finch, M., Sutherland, R., Kingsland, M., Wolfenden, L., Wedesweiler, T., Herrmann, V., & Yoong, S. L. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/27760 · Cited by 15
“Stratification by this number of factors was deemed appropriate for the sample size [38].”
Pond, N., Finch, M., Sutherland, R., Wolfenden, L., Nathan, N., Kingsland, M., Grady, A., Gillham, K. E., Herrmann, V., & Yoong, S. L. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026829 · Cited by 15
Rebai, A., Chbili, C., Amor, S. B., Hassine, A., Ammou, S. B., & Saguem, S. (2020) · Revue Neurologique · doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2020.03.013 · Cited by 14
Barragan, A. A., Hovingh, E., Bas, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17966 · Cited by 14
Periodontal bone height of exclusive narghile smokers compared with exclusive cigarette smokers
Khemiss, M., Khélifa, M. B., Rejeb, M. B., & Saad, H. B. (2016) · Libyan Journal of Medicine · doi:10.3402/ljm.v11.31689 · Cited by 14
“Sample size The sample size was estimated using the following formula (32): N [(Za/2) 2 P (1 P) D]/E(2); P was the proportion of the main event of interest (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGroß, S., Wunderlich, K., Arpagaus, A., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-06938-w · Cited by 13
“Gender-matched randomization ensures balanced gender distribution but may lead to minimal group size differences [18].”
Mirza, M. P., Gecht, M. R., Keating, E., Krischer, A., Kim, H., & Kottorp, A. (2020) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2020.039842 · Cited by 13
“Future trials may benefit from alternative randomization procedures such as covariate adaptive randomization (Kang et al., 2008), in which participants are sequentially assigned to treatment groups using an algorithm that includes covariates of previously allocated participants.”
MethodJessee, M. B., Dankel, S. J., Bentley, J. P., & Loenneke, J. P. (2021) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01470-5 · Cited by 17
“All subsequent participants were placed into groups based upon their dominant arm muscle strength via covariate adaptive randomization [15].”
MethodFerreira, J. M., Rodríguez, F. D., Santos, A., Dieste, Ó., Acuña, S. T., & Juristo, N. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3149586 · Cited by 14
“This randomization procedure is an experimental guarantee [73], as interferences may or may not occur irrespective of their impact.”
BackgroundFalsarella, P. M., Nasser, F., Affonso, B. B., et al. (2023) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2023.01.022 · Cited by 13
Robinson, N., Connolly, J., Suddrey, G., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01054-5 · Cited by 15
“Simple randomization was considered to be an acceptable method given the intended sample size was above 200 people [76, 77].”
Dodier, P., Civilla, L., Mallouhi, A., Haider, L., Cho, A., Lederer, P., Wang, W.-T., Dorfer, C., Hosmann, A., Rössler, K., et al. (2023) · Neurosurgical FOCUS · doi:10.3171/2023.10.focus23640 · Cited by 13
Leerssen, J., Foster‐Dingley, J. C., Lakbila‐Kamal, O., Dekkers, L. M. S., Albers, A. C. W., Ikelaar, S. L. C., Maksimovic, T., Wassing, R., Houtman, S. J., Bresser, T., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02554-8 · Cited by 14
Ho, K. Y., Cheung, P. M., Cheng, T. W., Suen, W. Y., Ho, H. Y., & Cheung, D. S. K. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/35224 · Cited by 14
Allen, L. B., Tsao, J. C. I., Hayes, L. P., & Zeltzer, L. K. (2011) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-132 · Cited by 13
“Then the following 4 participants are assigned based on the next block [36].”
BackgroundRandomizing research participants: Promoting balance and concealment in small samples
Matthews, E. E., Cook, P. F., Terada, M., & Aloia, M. S. (2010) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20375 · Cited by 13
“However, the stratified block method is limited in the number of strata (Herbert, 2005; Kang et al., 2008).”
Hasni, Y., Bachrouch, S., Mahjoub, M., Maaroufi, A., Rouatbi, S., & Saad, H. B. (2019) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/1557988319825754 · Cited by 13
“The null hypothesis (Kang et al., 2008) was H 0 : m 1 = m 2 and the alternative one was H a : m 1 = m 2 + d; where “d” was the difference between two means and n 1 and n 2 were the sample size for two groups (ENSs and AHNSs) such N = n 1 + n 2 .”
BackgroundMethodChangsan, N., Srichana, T., Atipairin, A., & Sawatdee, S. (2023) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2023.32.sup12.s22 · Cited by 13
Lim, M., Kim, D. J., Nascimento, T. D., & DaSilva, A. F. M. (2024) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2024.02.012 · Cited by 12
Hypnosis for depression: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis
Souza, F. L., Moura, M. S., Silva, J. V. A., & Elkins, G. R. (2024) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101913 · Cited by 16
Furnell, M., Gordon, W. V., & Elander, J. (2024) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02488-2 · Cited by 14
“To balance various covariates, we performed a multi-block stratified randomization (Kang et al., 2008) to sort eligible participants into either Group 1 or Group 2.”
Sellami, M., Almuraikhy, S., Naja, K., Anwardeen, N. R., Al-Amri, H. S., Prince, M. S., Aden, A. A., Doemling, A., & Elrayess, M. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86306-2 · Cited by 12
Kooshki, A., Akbarzadeh, R., Amin, B., Tofighiyan, T., & Foroumandi, E. (2023) · Nephrology · doi:10.1111/nep.14149 · Cited by 13
Nagino, K., Okumura, Y., Akasaki, Y., Fujio, K., Huang, T., Sung, J., Midorikawa‐Inomata, A., Fujimoto, K., Eguchi, A., Shokirova, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42638 · Cited by 12
“Those who drew odd and even numbers were assigned to the paper-app and app-paper groups, respectively [42].”
Pharmacological modeling and biostatistical analysis of a new drug
Ananthakrishnan, R., & Gona (2010) · Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials · doi:10.2147/oajct.s9290 · Cited by 12
“Subjects can also be randomized based on gender, age, and other characteristics, using a procedure known as stratified randomization.(48) Stratified randomization is often implemented in a two step process that first involves a block randomization scheme and then involves the creation of a randomization list per strat…”
MethodKoç, C., Kurt, E. E., Koçak, F. A., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-020-02032-6 · Cited by 12
Guezguez, F., Knaz, H., Anane, I., Bougrida, M., & Saad, H. B. (2021) · Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1080/17476348.2021.1906653 · Cited by 12
“The sample size was estimated using the following formula [17]:”
BackgroundMethodAllocation concealment: a methodological review
Clark, L., Schmidt, U., Tharmanathan, P., Adamson, J., Hewitt, C., & Torgerson, D. (2013) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12032 · Cited by 12
Valenta, M., Botek, M., Krejčí, J., McKune, A. J., Sládečková, B., Neuls, F., Bajgar, R., & Klimešová, I. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279307 · Cited by 12
“[19], this procedure can be described as block randomization, which prevents an unequal number of participants in two groups.”
MethodThakur, V., Mittal, S., Tewari, S., et al. (2023) · Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2023.02.004 · Cited by 11
DaSilva, A. F., Kim, D. J., Lim, M., Nascimento, T., Scott, P. J. H., Smith, Y., Koeppe, R., Zubieta, J., & Kaciroti, N. (2023) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s407738 · Cited by 12
“Randomization and HD-tDCS Intervention Among 293 patients assessed for eligibility, we enrolled 28 patients and randomized them into active or sham treatment in a 1:1 ratio using the Taves covariate adaptive randomization method balancing sex and age.(29) We reported the study flow under the Consolidated Standards of…”
MethodThaysen‐Petersen, D., Hammerum, S. K., Vissing, A.-C., Oestrich, I. H., Nordentoft, M., Düring, S. W., & Fink‐Jensen, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1337898 · Cited by 16
“Randomization was strati fi ed by therapist to minimize any confounding effects of speci fi c therapists and for each therapist to practice manuals for both study arms (38).”
MethodResultThe impact of hedonic social media use during microbreaks on employee resources recovery
Grobelny, J., Glinka, M., & Chirkowska-Smolak, T. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-72825-x · Cited by 12
“Unevenly distributed covariates were not expected to influence the investigated effect, which justifies the selection of a block-based plan 78 .”
BackgroundGagnon, S., Stinchcombe, A., Curtis, M., Kateb, M., Polgar, J. M., Porter, M. M., & Bédard, M. (2019) · Traffic Injury Prevention · doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1630826 · Cited by 11
“Participants were subsequently randomized to the BT group, the BTþOR group, or the BTþORþ S group through stratified randomization (i.e., an approach that results in equal-sized study groups that are balanced by covariates; Kang et al. 2008).”
MethodEfficacy Randomized Controlled Trials
Capili, B., & Anastasi, J. K. (2023) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.naj.0000921808.23646.01 · Cited by 11
“Once the block size is determined, the statistician ascertains all possible combinations for each block, each combination containing equal numbers of both study groups.(7) Finally, the blocks are randomly selected to determine each participant’s group assignment.”
MethodKhemiss, M., Fekih, D. B., Khélifa, M. B., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/1557988319839872 · Cited by 11
“The sample size was estimated using a predictive formula (Kang et al., 2008), detailed in the Appendix.”
MethodWillaert, W., Malfliet, A., Coppieters, I., Lenoir, D., Pauw, R. D., Danneels, L. A., Roussel, N. A., Meeus, M., Cagnie, B. J., Nijs, J., et al. (2020) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12884 · Cited by 13
“block allocation, with stratification factors being treatment center (Ghent or Brussels) and gender (male or female) and with a block size of 4.(37,38) Blinding”
Considerations for Evidence Frameworks in Education Research
Taylor, J. A., Davis, E. B., & Michaelson, L. (2021) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x20985077 · Cited by 11
“However, in randomized studies with small sample sizes, either at the individual or cluster level, the likelihood is lower that balance will be achieved on individual or cluster-level characteristics that are correlated with outcomes (e.g., Kang et al., 2008; Lachin et al.,1988).”
Backgroundvan Stuivenberg-Vrielink, C., de Laat, F., Meijer, R., & van Kuijk, A. A. (2010) · Prosthetics and Orthotics International · doi:10.3109/03093640902929285 · Cited by 11
“Randomization was based on a single sequence of random assignments using shuffled envelopes.(21) The observers were blinded for each other’s measurements.”
MethodProfil inflammatoire systémique des fumeurs atteints de BPCO comparés aux fumeurs indemnes de BPCO
Mosrane, Y., Bougrida, M., Alloui, A. S., Martani, M., Rouabah, L., Bourahli, M. K., Mehdioui, H., & Saad, H. B. (2017) · Revue de Pneumologie Clinique · doi:10.1016/j.pneumo.2017.07.003 · Cited by 11
The Potential of Intra-Articular Therapies in Managing Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
Pojala, C. V., Toma, S., Costache, C., Peter, T., Pojala, C. E., Roman, N. A., & Dima, L. (2024) · Clinics and Practice · doi:10.3390/clinpract14050157 · Cited by 10
“Small Sample Size: Studies with fewer than 20 participants per treatment group may not provide sufficient statistical power to draw reliable conclusions [46].”
BackgroundStaden, S. M. V., Holmes, H. K., & Hille, J. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78435-7 · Cited by 10
Sex-specific response to whole-body vibration training: a randomized controlled trial
Hartard, M., Seiler, A., Spitzenpfeil, P., Engel, L., Hartard, D., Fenneni, M. A., & Saad, H. B. (2021) · Biology of Sport · doi:10.5114/biolsport.2021.102806 · Cited by 10
“The sample size was estimated using the following formula [51]: N = [(r + 1) (Z α /2 + Z 1-β ) 2 2 ]/r d 2 ,where – n 1 and n 2 are the sample sizes for the two groups, where N = n 1 + n 2 ; – “Z α /2 ” is the normal deviate at a level of significance = 2.58 (99% level of significance); – “Z 1-β ”…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRibé-Viñes, J. M., Gutiérrez‐Maldonado, J., Zabolipour, Z., & Ferrer‐García, M. (2023) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101915 · Cited by 12
A Simple Guide to Randomized Controlled Trials
Liakos, A., Pagkalidou, E., Karagiannis, T., Malandris, K., Avgerinos, I., Gigi, E., Bekiari, E., Haidich, A., & Τσάπας, Α. (2024) · The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds · doi:10.1177/15347346241236385 · Cited by 9
Mohamed, G. B. H., & Saad, H. B. (2016) · Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis · doi:10.1016/j.ejcdt.2016.01.007 · Cited by 10
Graston Technique® as a Treatment for Patients with Chronic Plantar Heel Pain
Garrett, T. (2019) · Clinical Practice in Athletic Training · doi:10.31622/2019/0003.4 · Cited by 10
The efficacy and acceptability of the Triple P: Positive Parenting Program with Turkish parents
Arkan, B., Güvenir, T., Ralph, A., & Day, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing · doi:10.1111/jcap.12283 · Cited by 10
Wienbergen, H., Fach, A., Erdmann, J., Katalinic, A., Eisemann, N., Krawitz, P. M., Maj, C., Borisov, O., Munz, M., Nöethen, M. M., et al. (2020) · Clinical Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00392-020-01695-w · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, M., Ragan, B. G., & Park, J.-H.
- Affiliations
- Middle Tennessee State University (US)
- University of Northern Iowa (US)
- Korea National Sport University (KR)
- Venue
- Journal of Athletic Training
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-221
- ISSN
- 1062-6050 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2267325
- OpenAlex
- W2103799103
- Semantic Scholar
- 76a894a7f31f671125792589418911fc63574599
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Athletic Training (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- randomization technique, clinical trials, block randomization, stratified randomization, covariate-adaptive randomization, covariate control, evidence-based practice
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Random Allocation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review