Cited by 78Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Bereavement, Complicated Grief, and DSM, Part 2: Complicated Grief: (ASCP Corner)

Open access
Zisook, Sidney, Simon, Naomi M., Reynolds, Charles F., Pies, Ronald, Lebowitz, Barry, Young, Ilanit Tal, Madowitz, Jennifer, Shear, M. Katherine·2010·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

The Case of Ms B Ms B is a 65-year-old woman who comes for an evaluation because she isn’t getting past her intense grief over her deceased husband, who died of a myocardial infarction 4 years ago. Ms B is tearful, recalling how wonderful her husband was, that he was her soulmate, and that he loved her in a way no one else ever did. Although she thinks about her husband daily, she avoids looking at pictures, visiting the gravesite, or even going to places they used to enjoy together to try to ward off the intense bouts of misery these reminders provoke. At times, she seems angry, stating emphatically that he shouldn’t have died. She is plagued by thoughts about the doctors who did not diagnose the impending heart attack. Even though she knows that it is irrational, she can’t get the idea out of her mind that his doctor should have suspected that he had blocked arteries during a routine visit 1 week prior to his death and done something to save him. She often neglects to take her hypertension medication, knowing that this could be dangerous, and agrees that she is leaving life and death to chance. Religion used to be a source of comfort, but she no longer attends church regularly or finds companionship or support from the church community. Ms B maintains that no one can help her because no one can bring her husband back. Many clinicians don’t know quite what to make of Ms B’s continued suffering. Her symptoms clearly reflect grief, yet the excessive avoidance and preoccupation with thoughts that her husband need not have died and the persistence of intense acute grief symptoms over a 4-year period seem atypical. She has some mood symptoms, but does not meet criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD). Her avoidance behaviors and preoccupation with her husband’s death resemble the symptoms of PTSD, but the focus of her thoughts is related to her loss rather than reexperiencing a dangerous event, and she feels sadness rather than fear. She does not meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Her grief symptoms have not changed much since her husband died 4 years ago. She and her family feel she is stuck in her grief. Does she have a definable, serious, treatable disorder? Not according to the DSM-IV-TR.1 The rest of this review will describe the syndrome of complicated grief, a condition that describes Ms B’s state and that also requires a specific, targeted treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.10ac06391blu

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much published theory and research use arbitrary expressions such as 'a significant minority' to describe the number of individuals experiencing severe complications following bereavement.

    “With no clear-cut data regarding the prevalence of PGD, much published theory and research use rather arbitrary expressions, such as 'a significant minority' (e.g., Jordan and Litz, 2014; Zisook et al., 2010), to describe the number of individuals experiencing severe complications following bereavement.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Shear MK Clayton PJ Guest Editorial Psychiatric Annals 38 10 643 646 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zisook, S., Simon, N. M., Reynolds, C. F., Pies, R., Lebowitz, B., Young, I. T., Madowitz, J., & Shear, M. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2010-08-15
Volume
71
Issue
08
Pages
1097-1098
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1491306098
Cited by
78
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085297, R01MH070741, R01MH060783)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
complicated grief, bereavement, prolonged grief disorder, DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, medication non-adherence
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Aged, Mental Disorders, Bereavement, Major Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Grief, Humans, Life Change Events, Terminology as Topic, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Widowhood, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review