Cited by 648Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorder

Mardi J. Horowitz, Bryna Siegel, Are Holen, George A. Bonanno, Constance Milbrath, Charles H. Stinson·1997·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Some prolonged and turbulent grief reactions include symptoms that differ from the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. The authors investigated a new diagnosis that would include these symptoms. METHOD: They developed observer-based definitions of 30 symptoms noted clinically in previous longitudinal interviews of bereaved persons and then designed a plan to investigate whether any combination of these would serve as criteria for a possible new diagnosis of complicated grief disorder. Using a structured diagnostic interview, they assessed 70 subjects whose spouses had died. Latent class model analyses and signal detection procedures were used to calibrate the data against global clinical ratings and self-report measures of grief-specific distress. RESULTS: Complicated grief disorder was found to be characterized by a smaller set of the assessed symptoms. Subjects elected by an algorithm for these symptoms patterns did not significantly overlap with subjects who received a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS: A new diagnosis of complicated grief disorder may be indicated. Its criteria would include the current experience (more than a year after a loss) of intense intrusive thoughts, pangs of severe emotion, distressing yearnings, feeling excessively alone and empty, excessively avoiding tasks reminiscent of the deceased, unusual sleep disturbances, and maladaptive levels of loss of interest in personal activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.154.7.904

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Global North samples, dreaming of the deceased was originally one of the 30 symptoms proposed as a key intrusive symptom of complicated grief but is not used in the more recent Inventory of Complicated Grief.

    “In Global North samples, dreaming of the deceased was originally one of the 30 symptoms proposed as a key intrusive symptom of complicated grief (Horowitz et al., 1997), but is not used in the more recent Inventory of Complicated Grief (Prigerson et al., 1995).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horowitz, M. J., Siegel, B., Holen, A., Bonanno, G. A., Milbrath, C., & Stinson, C. H.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
154
Issue
7
Pages
904-910
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2179616438
Cited by
648
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 38
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
diagnostic criteria, prolonged grief disorder, bereavement, death of a spouse, intrusive thoughts, longing, sleep disorders, avoidance, loss of interest, major depressive disorder, latent class analysis, signal detection
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Adult, Algorithms, Mental Disorders, Bereavement, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Family Characteristics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Terminology as Topic, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Likelihood Functions, Widowhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review