Cited by 121Treatment of Major DepressionDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Paroxetine and Fluoxetine Effects On Mood and Cognitive Functions in Depressed Nondemented Elderly Patients

Cassano, Giovanni Battista, Puca, Francomichele, Scapicchio, Pier Luigi, Trabucchi, Marco, Italian Study Group on Depression in Elderly Patients·2002·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the elderly population complains of depressive symptoms. The ideal antidepressant for these patients, who often suffer from numerous concomitant diseases, should not worsen their cognitive functions and should be free of contraindications. METHOD: To assess the effects of 2 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on cognitive functions in elderly depressed patients (ICD-10 criteria), we conducted a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study comparing paroxetine (20-40 mg daily) and fluoxetine (20-60 mg daily) treatment for 1 year. Cognitive performance was evaluated by means of the Buschke Selective Reminding Test, the Blessed Information and Memory Test, the Clifton Assessment Schedule, the Cancellation Task Test, and the Wechsler Paired Word Test; the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Anxiety Scale were administered to assess the course of depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. RESULTS: 242 patients were enrolled (mean +/- SD age = 75.4 +/- 6.6 years). During the study, no deterioration of cognition was observed; on the contrary, most of the tested cognitive functions improved. Good antidepressant efficacy was maintained for over 1 year with both drugs, based on the percentage of responders to treatment (patients achieving a HAM-D total score < 10; 60%). Both drugs showed a good tolerability and safety profile. CONCLUSION: The 2 antidepressants proved to be suitable for the long-term treatment of depression in the elderly and to be devoid of detrimental effects on the tested cognitive functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v63n0504

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cassano, G. B., Puca, F., Scapicchio, P. L., Trabucchi, M., & Italian Study Group on Depression in Elderly Patients
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2002-05-15
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
396-402
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046119291
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
paroxetine, fluoxetine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, geriatric depression, cognitive function, long-term antidepressant treatment, antidepressant efficacy, safety and tolerability, anxiety symptoms
MeSH terms
Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review