Cited by 111Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Divalproex Sodium for the Treatment of Conduct Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Steiner, Hans, Petersen, Maya L., Saxena, Kirti, Ford, Sekou, Matthews, Zakee·2003·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New treatments for conduct disorder are sorely needed. We aimed to test the efficacy of divalproex sodium for the treatment of conduct disorder. METHOD: Seventy-one youths with conduct disorder according to DSM-IV criteria were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, 7-week clinical trial. Subjects were all adolescent males with at least 1 crime conviction. Subjects were randomized into high- and low-dose conditions and were openly managed by a clinical team. Subjects and independent outcome raters were blinded to condition. Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings, Weinberger Adjustment Inventory ratings, and staff ratings of behavioral privilege were used to assess outcome. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses showed significant associations between assignment to the high-dose condition and ratings on the CGI-S (p =.02) and CGI-I (p =.0008). Self-reported weekly impulse control was significantly better in the high-dose condition (p <.05), and association between improvement in self-restraint and treatment condition was of borderline statistical significance (p <.06). Parallel analyses comparing outcome by blood drug level achieved strengthened the results, as expected. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study in a most difficult population suggests a role for divalproex sodium in the treatment of conduct disorder. Divalproex sodium improved self-reported impulse control and self-restraint, variables shown to be predictive of criminal recidivism. Studies are needed of longer-term impact and side-effect profiles. This is one of few controlled psychopharmacologic studies of conduct disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v64n1007

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steiner, H., Petersen, M. L., Saxena, K., Ford, S., & Matthews, Z.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2003-10-15
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
1183-1191
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068448083
Cited by
110
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
divalproex sodium, valproic acid, conduct disorder, adolescent boys, impulse control, self-restraint, psychopharmacologic treatment, recidivism, blood drug levels
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aggression, Anger, Anticonvulsants, Arousal, Crime, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Internal-External Control, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Residential Treatment, Socialization, Valproic Acid, Treatment Outcome, Conduct Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review