Cited by 565Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Severe Mood Dysregulation, Irritability, and the Diagnostic Boundaries of Bipolar Disorder in Youths

Open access
Leibenluft, Ellen·2011·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

In recent years, increasing numbers of children have been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. In some cases, children with unstable mood clearly meet current diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder, and in others, the diagnosis is unclear. Severe mood dysregulation is a syndrome defined to capture the symptomatology of children whose diagnostic status with respect to bipolar disorder is uncertain, that is, those who have severe, nonepisodic irritability and the hyperarousal symptoms characteristic of mania but who lack the well-demarcated periods of elevated or irritable mood characteristic of bipolar disorder. Levels of impairment are comparable between youths with bipolar disorder and those with severe mood dysregulation. An emerging literature compares children with severe mood dysregulation and those with bipolar disorder in longitudinal course, family history, and pathophysiology. Longitudinal data in both clinical and community samples indicate that nonepisodic irritability in youths is common and is associated with an elevated risk for anxiety and unipolar depressive disorders, but not bipolar disorder, in adulthood. Data also suggest that youths with severe mood dysregulation have lower familial rates of bipolar disorder than do those with bipolar disorder. While youths in both patient groups have deficits in face emotion labeling and experience more frustration than do normally developing children, the brain mechanisms mediating these pathophysiologic abnormalities appear to differ between the two patient groups. No specific treatment for severe mood dysregulation currently exists, but verification of its identity as a syndrome distinct from bipolar disorder by further research should include treatment trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050766

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DSM-5 Childhood and Adolescent Disorders Work Group compared evidence from natural history and treatment studies of classic bipolar disorder versus bipolar disorder diagnosed using nonepisodic irritability as a criterion, and determined that separate disorders based on episodic versus persistent irritability were justified.

    “the DSM-5 Childhood and Adolescent Disorders Work Group compared evidence from natural history and treatment studies of classic bipolar disorder versus bipolar disorder diagnosed using nonepisodic irritability as a criterion, and determined that separate disorders based on episodic versus persistent irritability were justified (45).”

    From The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes (2013) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The prevalence of childhood bipolar disorders is growing at an alarming rate.

    “With the prevalence of childhood bipolar disorders growing at an alarming rate”

    From The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes (2013) · cites this paper as [45]

    In “Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder in Youths: The Controversy” (page not supplied), the paper reports a marked rise in bipolar disorder diagnoses among youths. It explicitly says this could reflect a true prevalence increase, better case identification, or changed diagnostic concepts, so it does not establish that the disorder’s prevalence is growing. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leibenluft, E.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Leibenluft, Ellen
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-02
Volume
168
Issue
2
Pages
129-142
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2118839664
Cited by
565
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 52
FWCI
26.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002786)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
severe mood dysregulation, bipolar disorder, children and adolescents, hyperarousal, diagnostic boundaries, familial risk, anxiety, major depressive disorder, frustration, longitudinal course, pathophysiology, treatment
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Bipolar Disorder, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Irritable Mood, Longitudinal Studies, Neural Pathways, Phenotype, Psychotropic Drugs, Risk Factors, Mood Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review