Cited by 6Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsMedicinal Plant Research

Molecular characterization of neuroprotective activities of plant based products could revive their utilization and lead discovery of new drug candidates for brain diseases

Open access
Hegde, MuralidharL·2014·Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0975-7406.129168

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Galantamine and rivastigmine, two FDA-approved drugs for Alzheimer's disease, are derived from natural sources.

    “For example, galantamine and rivastigmine (ChEIs), two FDA-approved drugs for AD, are derived from natural sources, highlighting the importance of traditional medicine in modern therapeutic strategies [18,19,20].”

    From Cholinesterase Inhibitors from Plants and Their Potential in Alzheimer’s Treatment: Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The paper’s main text says galantamine and the physostigmine-derivative rivastigmine are approved drugs for Alzheimer’s disease based on natural products (page unavailable). It does not specify FDA approval or identify them as cholinesterase inhibitors. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hegde, M.
Corresponding author
Hegde, MuralidharL
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Published
2014
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
63
ISSN
0975-7406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319437596
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PubMed
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS088645)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
neuroprotection, phytochemicals, medicinal plants, brain disorders, drug discovery, molecular characterization, neurodegenerative diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review