Cited by 164Nerve injury and regenerationNerve Injury and RehabilitationNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Basic mechanisms of peripheral nerve injury and treatment via electrical stimulation

Open access
Chu, Xiao-Lei, Song, Xi-Zi, Li, Qi, Li, Yu-Ru, He, Feng, Gu, Xiao-Song, Ming, Dong·2022·Neural Regeneration Research

Abstract

Previous studies on the mechanisms of peripheral nerve injury (PNI) have mainly focused on the pathophysiological changes within a single injury site. However, recent studies have indicated that within the central nervous system, PNI can lead to changes in both injury sites and target organs at the cellular and molecular levels. Therefore, the basic mechanisms of PNI have not been comprehensively understood. Although electrical stimulation was found to promote axonal regeneration and functional rehabilitation after PNI, as well as to alleviate neuropathic pain, the specific mechanisms of successful PNI treatment are unclear. We summarize and discuss the basic mechanisms of PNI and of treatment via electrical stimulation. After PNI, activity in the central nervous system (spinal cord) is altered, which can limit regeneration of the damaged nerve. For example, cell apoptosis and synaptic stripping in the anterior horn of the spinal cord can reduce the speed of nerve regeneration. The pathological changes in the posterior horn of the spinal cord can modulate sensory abnormalities after PNI. This can be observed in cases of ectopic discharge of the dorsal root ganglion leading to increased pain signal transmission. The injured site of the peripheral nerve is also an important factor affecting post-PNI repair. After PNI, the proximal end of the injured site sends out axial buds to innervate both the skin and muscle at the injury site. A slow speed of axon regeneration leads to low nerve regeneration. Therefore, it can take a long time for the proximal nerve to reinnervate the skin and muscle at the injured site. From the perspective of target organs, long-term denervation can cause atrophy of the corresponding skeletal muscle, which leads to abnormal sensory perception and hyperalgesia, and finally, the loss of target organ function. The mechanisms underlying the use of electrical stimulation to treat PNI include the inhibition of synaptic stripping, addressing the excessive excitability of the dorsal root ganglion, alleviating neuropathic pain, improving neurological function, and accelerating nerve regeneration. Electrical stimulation of target organs can reduce the atrophy of denervated skeletal muscle and promote the recovery of sensory function. Findings from the included studies confirm that after PNI, a series of physiological and pathological changes occur in the spinal cord, injury site, and target organs, leading to dysfunction. Electrical stimulation may address the pathophysiological changes mentioned above, thus promoting nerve regeneration and ameliorating dysfunction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/1673-5374.335823

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peripheral nerves have the potential to self-repair and regenerate, aided by conditions such as anatomical continuity of the injured site, myelination, and the extent of the injury.

    “However, peripheral nerves have the potential to self-repair and regenerate, aided by conditions such as anatomical continuity of the injured site, myelination, and the extent of the injury [112].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, X.-L., Song, X.-Z., Li, Q., Li, Y.-R., He, F., Gu, X.-S., & Ming, D.
Affiliations
  • Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Tianjin University of Sport (CN)
Corresponding author
  • He, Feng
  • Gu, Xiao-Song
Venue
Neural Regeneration Research
Published
2022-02-28
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
2185-2193
ISSN
  • 1673-5374 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-7958
OpenAlex
W4220934018
Cited by
164
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Neural Regeneration Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
peripheral nerve injury, electrical stimulation, axon regeneration, neuropathic pain, spinal cord, synaptic stripping, dorsal root ganglia, ectopic discharges, denervation, skeletal muscle atrophy, hyperalgesia, functional rehabilitation, target organs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review