Cited by 89Mental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health InterventionsEmotion and Mood Recognition

The Relationship between Clinical, Momentary, and Sensor-based Assessment of Depression

Open access
Saeb, Sohrab, Zhang, Mi, Kwasny, Mary, Karr, Christopher, Kording, Konrad, Mohr, David·2015·Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

Abstract

The clinical assessment of severity of depressive symptoms is commonly performed with standardized self-report questionnaires, most notably the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), which are usually administered in a clinic. These questionnaires evaluate symptoms that are stable over time. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods, on the other hand, acquire patient ratings of symptoms in the context of their lives. Today's smartphones allow us to also obtain objective contextual information, such as the GPS location, that may also be related to depression. Considering clinical PHQ-9 scores as ground truth, an interesting question is to what extent the EMA ratings and contextual sensor data can be used as potential predictors of depression. To answer this question, we obtained PHQ-9 scores from 18 participants with a variety of depressive symptoms in our lab, and then collected their EMA and GPS sensor data using their smartphones over a period of two weeks. We analyzed the relationship between GPS sensor features, EMA ratings, and the PHQ-9 scores. While we found a strong correlation between a number of sensor features extracted from the two-week period and the PHQ-9 scores, the other relationships remained non-significant. Our results suggest that depression is better evaluated using long-term sensor-based measurements than the momentary ratings of mental state or short-term sensor information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.259034

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Voida S MoodRhythm: Tracking and supporting daily rhythms ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saeb, S., Zhang, M., Kwasny, M., Karr, C., Kording, K., & Mohr, D.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Saeb, Sohrab
Venue
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
Publisher
ICST
Published
2015
Volume
2015
ISSN
2153-1633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2290270843
Cited by
89
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
7.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH090318)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
depression, PHQ-9, ecological momentary assessment, smartphone sensors, depression severity prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review