Cited by 234Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

There is an app for that! The current state of mobile applications (apps) for DSM-5 obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety and mood disorders: VAN AMERINGEN et al.

Open access
Van Ameringen, Michael, Turna, Jasmine, Khalesi, Zahra, Pullia, Katrina, Patterson, Beth·2017·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

Mental health apps are viewed as a promising modality to extend the reach of mental health care beyond the clinic. They do so by providing a means of assessment, tracking, and treatment through a smartphone. Given that nearly 2/3 of the American population owns a smartphone, mental health apps offer the possibility of overcoming treatment barriers such as geographic location or financial barriers. Unfortunately, the excitement surrounding mental health apps may be premature as the current supporting literature regarding their efficacy is limited. The app marketplace is littered with apps claiming to treat or assess symptoms, but even those created by reputable organizations or those incorporating components of evidence-based treatments have not yet been validated in terms of their efficacy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current state of the mental health app literature by examining published reports of apps designed for DSM-5 anxiety and mood disorders, OCD, and PTSD. The breadth of apps reviewed includes those oriented around assessment, symptom tracking, and treatment as well as "multipurpose" apps, which incorporate several of these components. This review will also present some of the most popular mental health apps which may have clinical utility and could be prescribed to clients. While we discuss many potential benefits of mental health apps, we focus on a number of issues that the current state of the app literature presents. Overall there is a significant disconnect between app developers, the scientific community and health care, leaving the utility of existing apps questionable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22657

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [69]69. U.S. smartphone use in 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Internet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/ 2015/04/01/chapter-one-a-portrait-of-smartphone-ownership/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Ameringen, M., Turna, J., Khalesi, Z., Pullia, K., & Patterson, B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences; McMaster University; Hamilton ON Canada
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
526-539
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620863547
Cited by
234
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 6
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mental health apps, mobile application, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, DSM-5, symptom monitoring, mental health assessment, app efficacy, evidence-based treatment, digital mental health
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Medical Informatics Applications, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Mood Disorders, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review