The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methane abatement strategies for cattle: Lipid supplementation of diets
Abstract
A study was conducted to investigate the impact of several lipid sources that supplied mainly long-chain fatty acids (FA), for their potential to reduce methane emissions from growing cattle. Sixteen Angus heifers (initial weight, 325 ± 41 kg) were used in the experiment, which was designed as a crossover with two groups, four 21-d periods, and four dietary treatments: control (no added lipid source), tallow, sunflower oil, and whole sunflower seeds. Lipid sources were added to supply 34 g fat kg-1 of dietary dry matter (DM), bringing the total dietary fat content to about 59 g kg-1 of DM. Adding tallow increased the dietary proportion of saturated FA (47 g 100 g -1 of FA), whereas sunflower oil and seeds decreased the proportion (21 g 100 g-1 of FA). The basal diets consisted of mainly whole-crop barley silage (650 g kg-1 of DM). Compared with the control, ad libitum intake was reduced (P < 0.001) with sunflower seeds, but not with tallow (P = 0.13) or sunflower oil (P = 0.53). About 14% less methane was emitted per animal when diets contained tallow or sunflower oil and 33% less methane was emitted when diets contained sunflower seeds (P < 0.001), compared with the control diet (177.4 g d-1). Relative differences in methane emissions among lipid sources were maintained after correction for intake of DM or gross energy. The methane reduction caused by tallow and sunflower seeds was partly due to decreased diet digestibility. Digestibility of neutral detergent fiber in the total tract decreased (P < 0.05) by 15% with tallow and by 20% with sunflower seeds compared with the control, with only a numerical reduction from control for sunflower oil (12%; P = 0.11). Consequently, digestible energy intake was about 4% higher (P < 0.001) for sunflower oil, but 3% lower (P = 0.02) with tallow and 12% lower (P < 0.001) with sunflower seeds, compared with the control. All lipid sources reduced methane emissions by an average of 17% when corrected for digestible energy intake (from 11.22 to 9.34 g methane Mcal-1; P = 0.01). We concluded that adding about 3% lipid to high-forage diets in the form of saturated or unsaturated long-chain FA decreases methane emissions, and could have substantial effects on methane inventories if implemented commercially. All three lipid sources suppressed methane production, but sunflower oil has good potential for on-farm adoption because it had minimal effects of fiber digestibility, increased the intake of digestible energy and the rate of gain of cattle, and lowered methane production. Although tallow and sunflower seeds are usually cheaper sources of lipid than sunflower oil, their cost effectiveness as methane abatement strategies would also need to account for their potentially negative effects on digestible energy intake and performance of cattle fed high-forage diets. key words: Beef cattle, diet, fat, greenhouse gases, lipid; methane, oil
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2 · Cited by 28,658
Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia
Weatherburn, M. W. (1967) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60252a045 · Cited by 4,099
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714
Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants.
Allen, M. S. (1996) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1996.74123063x · Cited by 555
Chemical composition and methane yield of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity
Schittenhelm, S. (2008) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2008.04.001 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review
Beauchemin, K. A., Kreuzer, M., O'Mara, F., & McAllister, T. A. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07199 · Cited by 1,162
Self-citationKnapp, J. R., Laur, G. L., Vadas, P. A., Weiss, W. P., & Tricarico, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7234 · Cited by 1,002
Beauchemin, K. A., Henry Janzen, H., Little, S. M., McAllister, T. A., & McGinn, S. M. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.008 · Cited by 397
Self-citationPatra, A. K. (2012) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2090-y · Cited by 263
Beauchemin, K. A., Janzen, H. H., Little, S. M., McAllister, T. A., & McGinn, S. M. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.047 · Cited by 167
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., & Petit, H. V.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 431-440
- ISSN
- 0008-3984 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2130868554
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane abatement strategies for cattle: Lipid supplementation of diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4141/cjas07011
- The paper
- Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., & Petit, H. V. (2007). Methane abatement strategies for cattle: Lipid supplementation of diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas07011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.