Cited by 42Plant tissue culture and regenerationBerry genetics and cultivation researchFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

Morphological and Molecular Analyses in Micropropagated Berry Plants Acclimatized under Ex Vitro Condition

Open access
Debnath, S. C., Vyas, P., Goyali, J. C., Igamberdiev, A. U.·2012·Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Abstract

Debnath, S. C., Vyas, P., Goyali, J. C. and Igamberdiev, A. U. 2012. Morphological and molecular analyses in micropropagated berry plants acclimatized under ex vitro condition. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 1065–1073. Berry crops include, but are not limited to, the members of the genera Fragaria (strawberry; Rosaceae), Rubus (brambles: raspberry and blackberry; Rosaceae), Vaccinium (blueberry, cranberry and lingonberry; Ericaceae) and Ribes (currant and gooseberry; Grossulariaceae). While berry fruits have long enjoyed huge popularity among consumers, tremendous progress in plant tissue culture, resulting in great advances in micropropagation, has occurred. The in vitro morphogenesis seems to be highly dependent on plant growth regulators and media used for culture, which is again genotype specific. Although automation of micropropagation in bioreactors has been advanced as a possible way of reducing the cost of propagation, optimal plant production depends on better understanding of physiological and biochemical responses of plants to the signals of the culture microenvironment and an optimization of specific physical and chemical culture conditions to control the morphogenesis of berry plants in liquid culture systems. Increased branching, vigorous vegetative growth and change in biochemical components are often noted in micropropagated plants acclimatized under ex vitro condition. Clonal fidelity can be a serious problem and strategies have been developed to reduce the variation to manageable levels. Molecular markers have been introduced in tissue culture research and can potentially be used in various facets of pertinent studies with berry crops. This paper describes in depth the progress of various aspects of berry propagation in vitro, the characterization of micropropagated berry plants for morphological characters, and the employment of molecular markers in these plants for the assessment of genetic fidelity, uniformity, stability and trueness-to-type among donor plants and tissue culture regenerants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4141/cjps2011-194

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Boxus, P., Damiano, C. and Brasseur, E. 1984. Strawberry. Pages 453Á486 in D. A. Amirato, P. V. Evans, W. R. Sharp, and Y. Yamada, eds. Handbook of plant cell culture. Vol. 3. Crop species. MacMillan, New York, NY.
  2. Debnath, S. C. 2006a. Propagation of Vaccinium in vitro: a review. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 6: 47Á71.
  3. Finn, C. 1999. Temperate berry crops. Pages 324Á334 in J. Janick, ed. Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Debnath, S. C., Vyas, P., Goyali, J. C., & Igamberdiev, A. U.
Affiliations
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Published
2012-11
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
1065-1073
ISSN
  • 0008-4220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1833
OpenAlex
W2134166845
Cited by
42
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Plant Science (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Berry genetics and cultivation research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
berry crops, micropropagation, acclimatization, ex vitro acclimatization, Fragaria, Rubus, Vaccinium, Ribes, clonal fidelity, genetic fidelity, molecular markers, morphological characterization, plant growth regulators, liquid culture, bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review