Cited by 49Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Changes in glucose tolerance with metformin treatment in polycystic ovary syndrome: A retrospective analysis

Sharma, Susmeeta T., Wickham, Edmond P., Nestler, John E.·2007·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective To determine whether treatment with metformin would prevent progression to glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).Methods We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of women treated for PCOS during a 5-year period. Eligibility criteria included exclusion of diabetes at baseline by an oral glucose tolerance test, treatment with metformin, and a repeated oral glucose tolerance test after at least 1 year of metformin therapy. Fifty women with PCOS fulfilled the eligibility criteria.Results At baseline, 11 women (22%) had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 39 (78%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT). After treatment with metformin, IGT persisted in 5 (45%) of the 11 women who had IGT at baseline, whereas 6 (55%) had reversion to NGT. During a mean treatment period of 43.3 months, 2 (5%) of the 39 women with baseline NGT had conversion to IGT, resulting in an annual conversion rate from NGT to IGT of 1.4%. In comparison with the 16% to 19% annual conversion rate reported in the literature, metformin treatment in this study resulted in an 11-fold decrease in the annual conversion rate from NGT to IGT (P = 0.01). None of the 50 women developed diabetes.Conclusion The findings of this retrospective study suggest that long-term treatment with metformin delays or prevents the development of IGT and type 2 diabetes in women with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep.13.4.373

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, S. T., Wickham, E. P., & Nestler, J. E.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Nestler, John E.
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
373-379
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974272787
Cited by
49
References
27
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
metformin, polycystic ovary syndrome, glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes prevention, oral glucose tolerance test, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Glucose Intolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review