Cited by 37Autophagy in Disease and TherapyGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsCellular transport and secretion

Linking Lysosomal Trafficking Defects with Changes in Aging and Stress Response in Drosophila

Open access
Simonsen, Anne, Cumming, Robert C., Finley, Kim D.·2007·Autophagy

Abstract

Defects in pathways that direct cellular components to the lysosome for degradation are often linked with a decrease in viability and with progressive disorders. Previously we had shown that blue cheese (bchs: Drosophila homologue of human Alfy) mutations lead to reduced longevity and the accumulation of ubiquitinated neural aggregates. A genetic modifier screen based on overexpression of Bchs in the eye was used to identify several potential genetic interactions, which included autophagic and endocytic trafficking genes as well as cytoskeletal and motor proteins and members of the SUMO and ubiquitin signaling pathways. We found that mutations in several of the genes identified in the screen also result in bchs-like phenotypes, including a reduction in adult lifespan and changes in ubiquitinated protein profiles. In addition, we show that Bchs modifiers belonging to the autophagic and trans-Golgi trafficking pathways also display defects in adult starvation response. Our data further support a role for Bchs/Alfy in the autophagic pathway and strongly indicate that autophagy plays an important role in aging and stress response.Addendum to:Genetic Modifiers of the Drosophila Blue Cheese Gene Link Defects in Lysosomal Transport with Decreased Lifespan and Altered Ubiquitinated Protein ProfilesA. Simonsen, R. Cumming, K. Lindmo, V. Galaviz, S. Cheng, T. Rusten and K. FinleyGenetics 2007; In press

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/auto.4604

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In flies, expression of specific autophagy genes prolongs lifespan and provides resistance to particular stressors.

    “recent work in flies has shown that expression of specific autophagy genes prolongs lifespan and provides resistance to particular stressors (Simonsen et al., 2007)”

    From Protein Homeostasis and Aging: the importance of exquisite quality control (2011) · cites this paper as Simonsen et al., 2007

    The paper reports in its Abstract that mutations in several autophagy-related genes reduce adult fly lifespan, and its starvation-response section reports increased starvation sensitivity in atg8a mutants. These findings link the genes to longevity and stress response, but the paper does not show that expressing those genes prolongs lifespan or increases stress resistance. Its Bchs overexpression experiment concerns an eye phenotype, not either claimed benefit. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies in worms and flies support that functional macroautophagy is necessary to preserve normal lifespan.

    “studies by other groups in worms and flies seem to support that functional macroautophagy is necessary to preserve normal lifespan (Juhasz et al., 2007; Morck and Pilon, 2006; Simonsen et al., 2007)”

    From Protein Homeostasis and Aging: the importance of exquisite quality control (2011) · cites this paper as Simonsen et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonsen, A., Cumming, R. C., & Finley, K. D.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2007-09-20
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
499-501
ISSN
  • 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8635
OpenAlex
W2048853932
Cited by
37
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autophagy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
lysosomal trafficking, aging, lifespan, genetic modifiers, ubiquitinated protein aggregates, starvation response, stress response, endosomal trafficking, ubiquitin signaling, Drosophila
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Autophagy, Drosophila, Humans, Lysosomes, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Signal Transduction, Genes, Insect, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review