Cited by 45Electromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsCircadian rhythm and melatoninGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

Cryptochrome: A photoreceptor with the properties of a magnetoreceptor?

Open access
Ritz, Thorsten, Yoshii, Taishi, Foerster, Charlotte, Ahmad, Margaret·2010·Communicative & Integrative Biology

Abstract

It was recently discovered that the photoreceptor cryptochrome is involved in mediating magnetosensitive entrainment of the internal clock of fruit flies.1 This discovery follows other recent studies implicating a role of cryptochrome in mediating magnetic sensitivity in orientation responses of fruit flies2,3 and growth responses of plants.4 Such widespread use of the same molecule for mediating magnetic sensitivity might suggest that cryptochrome is in some way optimal for detecting the magnetic field of the earth and that the magnetoreception function cannot be easily taken over by other molecules. This raises the question what properties might set cryptochromes apart from other molecules in terms of their ability to detect the geomagnetic field. Here, we will discuss possible answers to this question. We will first review the likely biophysical mechanism by which magnetic fields can be detected by a photoreceptor and discuss what constitutes an optimal photo-magneto-receptor. We will then discuss in how far cryptochrome matches the profile of an optimal molecule and what further steps are required for more conclusive answers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/cib.3.1.9865

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence that in plants, weak magnetic fields enhance cryptochrome responses.

    “There is evidence that in plants, weak magnetic fields enhance cryptochrome responses [100].”

    From The future of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [100]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritz, T., Yoshii, T., Foerster, C., & Ahmad, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (FR)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Margaret
Venue
Communicative & Integrative Biology
Published
2010-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
24-27
ISSN
1942-0889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015282995
Cited by
45
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Communicative & Integrative Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Keywords
cryptochrome, magnetoreception, photoreceptors, fruit flies, circadian entrainment, geomagnetic field detection, magnetic field sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review