Cited by 123Child Nutrition and Water AccessSchool Health and Nursing EducationFood Safety and Hygiene

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of a School-Based Hygiene Promotion and Sanitation Intervention on Pupil Hand Contamination in Western Kenya: A Cluster Randomized Trial

Open access
Greene, Leslie E., Freeman, Matthew C., Akoko, Daniel, Saboori, Shadi, Moe, Christine, Rheingans, Richard·2012·The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Handwashing with soap effectively reduces exposure to diarrhea-causing pathogens. Interventions to improve hygiene and sanitation conditions in schools within low-income countries have gained increased attention; however, their impact on schoolchildren's exposure to fecal pathogens has not been established. Our trial examined whether a school-based water, sanitation, and hygiene intervention reduced Escherichia coli contamination on pupils' hands in western Kenya. A hygiene promotion and water treatment intervention did not reduce risk of E. coli presence (relative risk [RR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54–1.56); the addition of new latrines to intervention schools significantly increased risk among girls (RR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.29–5.34), with a non-significant increase among boys (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.74–2.49). Efforts to increase usage of school latrines by constructing new facilities may pose a risk to children in the absence of sufficient hygiene behavior change, daily provision of soap and water, and anal cleansing materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0633

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. (A and B) Percentage of pupils with presence of any and high levels (≥ 100 colony-forming units (CFU)/hand) of Escherichia coli on their hands at schools receiving hygiene promotion and water treatment (HP&WT), additional sanitation (San + HP&WT), and control schools at baseline and follow-up. *n for baseline; follow-up
Figure 1. (A and B) Percentage of pupils with presence of any and high levels (≥ 100 colony-forming units (CFU)/hand) of Escherichia coli on their hands at schools receiving hygiene promotion and water treatment (HP&WT), additional sanitation (San + HP&WT), and control schools at baseline and follow-up. *n for baseline; follow-upCC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. (A and B) Percentage of pupils with presence of any Escherichia coli on their hands, by gender, at schools receiving hygiene promotion and water treatment (HP&WT), additional sanitation (San + HP&WT), and control schools at baseline and follow-up. *n for baseline; follow-up.
Figure 2. (A and B) Percentage of pupils with presence of any Escherichia coli on their hands, by gender, at schools receiving hygiene promotion and water treatment (HP&WT), additional sanitation (San + HP&WT), and control schools at baseline and follow-up. *n for baseline; follow-up.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. (A and B) Percentage of pupils with high levels (≥ 100 colony-forming units (CFU)/hand) of Escherichia coli on their hands, by gender, at schools receiving hygiene promotion and water treatment (HP&WT), additional sanitation (San + HP&WT), and control schools at baseline and follow-up. *n for baseline; follow-up.
Figure 3. (A and B) Percentage of pupils with high levels (≥ 100 colony-forming units (CFU)/hand) of Escherichia coli on their hands, by gender, at schools receiving hygiene promotion and water treatment (HP&WT), additional sanitation (San + HP&WT), and control schools at baseline and follow-up. *n for baseline; follow-up.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 123

Metadata

Authors
Greene, L. E., Freeman, M. C., Akoko, D., Saboori, S., Moe, C., & Rheingans, R.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Greene, Leslie E.
Venue
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2012-09-05
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
385-393
ISSN
  • 0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-1645
OpenAlex
W2150544519
Cited by
123
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Emory University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
hand hygiene, hand contamination, Escherichia coli, school sanitation, school latrines, hygiene promotion, fecal pathogens, elementary school students, diarrhea, sex differences, Western Kenya
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Diarrhea, Escherichia coli, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Hygiene, Kenya, Male, Poverty, Risk Factors, Sanitation, Schools, Soaps, Toilet Facilities, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review