Cited by 93Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Improving Dietary Self-Monitoring and Adherence with Hand-Held Computers: A Pilot Study

Glanz, Karen, Murphy, Suzanne, Moylan, Joanne, Evensen, Diana, Curb, J. David·2006·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

Purpose.: Innovations in information technology offer new opportunities for creative application of personalized, tailored feedback strategies for improving dietary adherence. We developed and tested a real-time diet-monitoring and feedback system using hand-held computers. The goals were to increase diet self-monitoring, reduce the burden of monitoring food intake, and increase adherence to dietary goals within a clinical trial. Methods.: Participants were 33 women in the Diet Modification arm of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). After using focus groups to determine system features, women used the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA)–based system for 1 month and received immediate and weekly tailored feedback. The process and outcomes were evaluated using real-time food records collected through the PDAs; surveys; and self-reported food frequency questionnaires. Results.: Participants significantly increased self-monitoring, improved their attitudes toward self-monitoring, and met their dietary goals more often. Reported total fat intake and percent energy from fat decreased significantly. There was a modest decrease in mean caloric intake. Discussion.: The pilot study findings support the largely untapped potential of handheld computers for improving diet monitoring and diet adherence, particularly within a clinical trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/0890-1171-20.3.165

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glanz, K., Murphy, S., Moylan, J., Evensen, D., & Curb, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Glanz, Karen
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2006-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
165-170
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2177996867
Cited by
93
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
dietary self-monitoring, dietary adherence, personal digital assistants, personalized feedback, dietary fat intake, energy intake, women's health, dietary change, Women's Health Initiative
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review