The Effect of Electronic Self‐Monitoring on Weight Loss and Dietary Intake: A Randomized Behavioral Weight Loss Trial
Open accessAbstract
Technology may improve self‐monitoring adherence and dietary changes in weight loss treatment. Our study aimed to investigate whether using a personal digital assistant (PDA) with dietary and exercise software, with and without a feedback message, compared to using a paper diary/record (PR), results in greater weight loss and improved self‐monitoring adherence. Healthy adults (N = 210) with a mean BMI of 34.01 kg/m 2 were randomized to one of three self‐monitoring approaches: PR (n = 72), PDA with self‐monitoring software (n = 68), or PDA with self‐monitoring software and daily feedback messages (PDA+FB, n = 70). All participants received standard behavioral treatment. Self‐monitoring adherence and change in body weight, waist circumference, and diet were assessed at 6 months; retention was 91%. All participants had a significant weight loss (P < 0.01) but weight loss did not differ among groups. A higher proportion of PDA+FB participants (63%) achieved ≥5% weight loss in comparison to the PR group (46%) (P < 0.05) and PDA group (49%) (P = 0.09). Median percent self‐monitoring adherence over the 6 months was higher in the PDA groups (PDA 80%; PDA+FB 90%) than in the PR group (55%) (P < 0.01). Waist circumference decreased more in the PDA groups than the PR group (P = 0.02). Similarly, the PDA groups reduced energy and saturated fat intake more than the PR group (P < 0.05). Self‐monitoring adherence was greater in the PDA groups with the greatest weight change observed in the PDA+FB group.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 31 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
A higher proportion of PDA+FB participants (63%) achieved at least 5% weight loss than PR participants (46%), P=0.04.
“A higher proportion of PDA+FB participants (63%) achieved ≥5% weight loss in comparison to the PR group (46%) (P < 0.05)”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“a higher proportion of participants in the PDA+FB group (63%) achieved ≥ 5% weight loss in comparison to the PR (46%) (P=0.04)”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“A higher proportion of the PDA+FB group achieved a ≥ 5% weight loss than the PR and PDA groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data
Post hoc, the proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss differed significantly between PDA+FB and the combined PDA and PR groups (P=0.03).
“Post hoc analyses revealed a significant difference in the proportion that achieved a ≥ 5% weight loss between the PDA+FB group and the combined PDA and PR groups (P = 0.03).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adherence to self-monitoring over time did not differ significantly between PDA and PDA+FB groups (P=0.11).
“There was no significant difference between the PDA and PDA+FB groups in adherence to self-monitoring over time (P = 0.11)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adherence to self-monitoring over time was significantly higher in PDA and PDA+FB groups than in the PR group (P<0.01 for each).
“adherence to self-monitoring over time was significantly higher in the PDA (P < 0.01) and PDA+FB (P < 0.01) groups compared to the PR group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Over the 6 months, adherence to self-monitoring was higher in PDA+FB (90%) and PDA (80%) than PR (55%), P<0.01.
“Median percent self-monitoring adherence over the 6 months was higher in the PDA groups (PDA 80%; PDA+FB 90%) than in the PR group (55%) (P < 0.01).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“The overall median adherence to self-monitoring for the entire study period of 6 months was better in the PDA groups than in the PR group; the proportion of sample adherent was 90%, 80% and 55% in the PDA+FB, PDA and PR groups, respectively (P < 0.01).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Our study revealed that a significantly greater proportion of participants in the PDA and the PDA+FB groups self-monitored compared to those in the PR group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Premisecitation
Feedback delivered in relation to goal achievement reinforces motivation for behavior change.
“based on evidence supporting the role of feedback in reinforcing motivation for behavior change when delivered in relation to goal achievement (9, 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10]
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
There was no statistically significant differential attrition or retention among the three treatment groups.
“We also did not find statistically significant differential attrition/retention among the 3 treatment groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The main difference between Tate's study and our trial is that their computer feedback was weekly while our PDA-delivered feedback occurred daily.
“The main difference between that study and our trial is that the computer feedback message in their study was delivered on a weekly basis and our PDA-delivered feedback message occurred daily (16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The significantly greater weight loss in our PDA+FB group suggests that combined self-monitoring and feedback delivered in real-time and daily might have provided reinforcement and sustained motivation needed to improve weight loss.
“The significantly greater weight loss in our PDA+FB group suggests that the combined self-monitoring and feedback message delivered in real-time and on a daily basis might have provided the reinforcement and sustained motivation that was needed to improve weight loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The addition of a programmed, tailored feedback message may have helped them make that connection.
“The addition of a programmed, tailored feedback message may have helped them make that connection (24).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The study achieved only 15.2% male representation despite extra recruitment efforts.
“An important limitation was that we achieved only 15.2% male representation despite extra efforts that were made to recruit men.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Individuals who use a PR face labor of maintaining handwritten records, searching for nutrient composition, and calculating subtotals.
“Individuals who use a PR are faced with the labor of maintaining handwritten records, searching for the nutrient composition of foods in a pocket manual, and calculating subtotals for nutritional intake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Research has shown a consistent relationship between dietary self-monitoring and success in losing and maintaining weight loss.
“Research has demonstrated a consistent relationship between dietary self-monitoring and success in losing weight and maintaining weight loss (1–4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked - Premisecitation
Self-monitoring increases individuals' awareness of their behavior and the circumstances surrounding it.
“Self-monitoring increases individuals' awareness of their behavior and the circumstances that precipitate or surround the behavior (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a later study by Tate's group, diary submission was significantly related to weight loss in both intervention groups.
“diary submission was significantly related to weight loss in both groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Emerging technologies may improve self-monitoring and weight-loss treatment success through feedback.
“Emerging technologies may improve self-monitoring and the success of weight-loss treatment through the feedback mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Daily tailored feedback messages may have enhanced the effect of standard behavioral weight loss treatment.
“suggesting that the daily tailored feedback messages may have enhanced the effect of standard behavioral weight loss treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There were no significant baseline differences in demographic and anthropometric characteristics among the three treatment groups.
“We found no significant differences in baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics among the 3 treatment groups (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our findings from this randomized trial with excellent retention provide preliminary data suggesting improved adherence to self-monitoring with PDA use.
“However, our findings from this randomized trial with excellent retention do provide preliminary data to suggest that there is improved adherence to self-monitoring with the use of a PDA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The randomized trial design used objective anthropometric measures.
“The major strengths of our study included the randomized trial design with objective measures of the anthropometric measures”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Paper records are time-consuming and tedious to complete.
“which is time consuming and tedious to complete”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“self-monitoring was often time-consuming and burdensome (26)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Interpretationcitation
The lower adherence in PR might be explained by disadvantages of using a PR.
“This might have been explained by the disadvantages to using a PR (25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because of methodological limitations in both studies, one cannot definitively conclude that approaches other than paper diaries result in better adherence or weight loss outcomes.
“Because of the methodological limitations in both studies, one cannot definitively conclude that approaches to self-monitoring other than the use of paper diaries result in better adherence or weight loss outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
This practice eliminated the opportunity to take corrective action if close to the daily energy or fat goal.
“This practice eliminated the opportunity to take corrective action if one was close to the daily energy or fat goal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 25
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe decline observed in this study is slightly less than in a previous trial, and the decline in PDA groups was significantly less than in the PR group.
“The decline that we observed in this study is slightly less than what we observed in a previous trial (23) and most important, the decline in the PDA groups was significantly less than what was observed in the PR group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdherence to self-monitoring physical activity was higher in PDA groups than PR: PR recorded 2.2 entries/week, PDA 2.7, PDA+FB 3.2 (P=0.006); post hoc PR was less adherent than combined PDA groups (P=0.007).
“On average, the PR group recorded 2.2 (1.8) entries per week over the 6-month period compared to the PDA group recording 2.7 (1.8) and the PDA+FB group recording 3.2 (1.8) entries per week (P = 0.006). Post hoc analyses revealed that the PR group was significantly less adherent than the combined PDA and PDA+FB groups (P = 0.007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWaist circumference decreased significantly within each group (P<0.01) and differed significantly among groups (P=0.03); post hoc combined PDA groups had greater percent decrease than PR (P=0.02).
“Percent median [IQR] waist circumference also decreased significantly (P < 0.01) within each group (PR −4.0% [−8.4, 0.0]%; PDA −5.0% [−8.5, −1.7]% and PDA+FB −6.4% [−11.5, −1.8]%) and was significantly different among groups (P = 0.03).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Post hoc analyses revealed a significant difference in percent waist circumference change between the PDA groups and the PR group (P = 0.02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 6 months, all three self-monitoring groups achieved statistically significant mean weight loss, and mean weight loss did not differ significantly among the groups.
“All participants had a significant weight loss (P < 0.01) but weight loss did not differ among groups.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“At 6 months, the percent mean [SD] weight loss was statistically significant (P< 0.01) for all treatment groups (PR 5.3% [5.9]%; PDA 5.5% [7.0]%; and PDA+FB 7.3% [6.6]%), with no significant differences among the groups.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“This study demonstrated that participants who used a PR, a PDA with dietary and exercise software or a PDA with the same software and a daily, tailored feedback message achieved significant weight loss at 6 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTotal energy intake decreased significantly in all three groups (P=0.05); combined PDA groups reduced total energy (P=0.03) and saturated fat (P=0.03) intake more than PR.
“Total energy intake (median [IQR]) decreased significantly among the three groups (PR −12.5 [−34.7, 0.0]%; PDA −19.9 [−39.2, −1.6]%; and PDA+FB −23.3 [−40.6, −8.3]% (P = 0.05). The combined PDA group reduced total energy (P = 0.03) and saturated fat (P = 0.03) intake more than the PR group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss was higher in PDA+FB (63%) than PDA (49%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.09).
“and PDA group (49%) (P = 0.09)”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“and PDA (49%) (P=0.09) groups”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenUse of technological devices might have been a barrier for some individuals; however, participants who were technologically naive were able to learn how to use the device.
“Use of technological devices might have been a barrier for some individuals; however, participants who were technologically naive were able to learn how to use the device.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll three treatment groups received the same standard behavioral intervention, differing only in self-monitoring tool.
“All 3 treatment groups received the same standard behavioral intervention”
- Also stated in: § Study design · plain
“All participants received a 24-month standard behavioral weight loss treatment and were randomly assigned to use 1 of 3 self-monitoring tools”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Study design · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe feedback message functioned as a compass and as a source of more frequent attention, which was a powerful reinforcer.
“The feedback message functioned as a compass that enabled the individual to stay on course toward the goal; it also functioned as a source of more frequent attention that `someone' was noticing what the participant was doing, which was another powerful reinforcer”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were randomly assigned, stratified by gender and ethnicity, to one of three self-monitoring modes.
“The participants were randomly assigned, stratified by gender and ethnicity, to 1 of the 3 different modes of self-monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenNo one has examined the use of PDAs with dietary and exercise software for self-monitoring in behavioral weight loss treatment.
“Despite the proliferation of hand-held devices, no one has examined the use of PDAs with dietary and exercise software for self-monitoring in behavioral weight loss treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt was unclear why improved adherence in PDA without feedback did not lead to greater weight loss than observed; this may suggest a more central role for individualized feedback to goal attainment.
“it was unclear why the improved adherence in the PDA without feedback group did not lead to a greater weight loss than what we observed. This may suggest a more central role for individualized feedback to goal attainment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Tate's study, the automatic computer feedback group was comparable in weight loss to human e-mail counseling at 3 months; at 6 months, e-mail counseling had significantly greater weight loss than computer-automated feedback or no counseling.
“While the group receiving the automatic computer feedback messages was comparable in weight loss to the human e-mail counseling group at 3 months; at 6 months, the e-mail counseling group had significantly greater weight loss than the computer-automated feedback group or no counseling group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo previous studies reported a significant association between number of diaries completed and weight loss, but neither reported a group difference in weight loss.
“Two previous studies addressed self-monitoring methods and reported a significant association between the number of diaries completed and weight loss; however, neither of them reported a group difference in weight loss (20, 21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study design was for 24-month final testing; results presented were for 6 months and only revealed short-term outcomes.
“the study design was for a 24-month final testing of the hypothesis; the results presented here were for 6 months and thus only revealed the short-term outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that later study, weight loss between groups was comparable at 3 months, but the e-mail message group lost significantly more weight at 6 months.
“Weight loss between the groups was comparable at 3 months; however, the group that received the e-mail message lost significantly more weight at 6 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThis was the first large randomized clinical trial to compare different self-monitoring methods in behavioral weight loss and to compare PDAs with paper diaries.
“This was the first large randomized clinical trial to compare different methods of self-monitoring in a behavioral weight loss intervention and to compare the use of PDAs to conventional paper diaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a pilot study, women in a diet modification trial given PDAs for self-monitoring with feedback significantly increased self-monitoring and more often achieved dietary goals.
“In a pilot study where women in a diet modification trial were given personal digital assistants (PDAs) for self-monitoring with feedback, participants significantly increased their self-monitoring and more often achieved dietary goals (14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe standard behavioral intervention has been successfully used in multiple studies.
“All 3 treatment groups received the same standard behavioral intervention, which has been successfully used in multiple studies (8, 17, 18).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAttention and guidance from the standard behavioral intervention facilitated weight loss across all groups, making the difference by self-monitoring method less pronounced than expected.
“The attention and guidance received through the standard behavioral intervention facilitated weight loss across all groups and thus the difference by method of self-monitoring was less pronounced than what was expected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe decline in self-monitoring over time has been a consistent finding in several studies.
“This decline in self-monitoring over time has been a consistent finding in several studies (12, 22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study had 91% retention at 6 months and 21.4% minority representation.
“An additional strength was our 91% retention rate at 6 months and the 21.4% minority representation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data91% (n=192) completed the 6-month assessment, with no differences in race, gender, age, weight or BMI between completers and non-completers.
“Ninety-one percent (n = 192) completed the 6-month assessment with no differences in race, gender, age, weight or BMI between completers and non-completers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a 4-week diet-focused weight loss trial comparing PDA to PR, dietary adherence was significantly higher in PDA (43%) than PR (28%); adherence to the self-monitoring method was not reported.
“In a 4-week, diet-focused weight loss trial that compared PDA for self-monitoring to PR, dietary adherence was significantly higher in the PDA group (43%) compared to the PR group (28%) (15); adherence to the self-monitoring method was not reported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAnalyses were performed using the intention-to-treat principle regardless of adherence and retention.
“Analyses were performed using the intention-to-treat principle regardless of the participant's adherence and retention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSensitivity analyses omitting outliers did not change the results, supporting robustness.
“When outliers were omitted via sensitivity analysis, the results did not change, supporting the robustness of our findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenNo clinical trials have examined the use of a PDA to deliver a tailored feedback message in response to recorded behavior.
“Moreover, no clinical trials have examined the use of a PDA to deliver a tailored feedback message in response to the recorded behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTate and colleagues showed that the number of weekly diaries submitted online was significantly related to weight loss.
“Tate and colleagues showed that the number of weekly diaries submitted online was significantly related to weight loss (4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMissing data were handled by baseline value carried forward imputation.
“Missing data were handled by a baseline value carried forward imputation approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMany individuals do not make the connection between self-monitoring and behavior change easily, which probably contributes to stopping self-monitoring.
“However, many individuals do not make that connection easily, which probably contributes to their stopping self-monitoring”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBenefits of using the PDA included portability, immediate access to a USDA database, real-time calculation and display of dietary subtotals, and saving commonly eaten meals.
“benefits of using the PDA included its portability and immediate access to a U.S. Dept. of Agriculture database containing 5000 to 6000 food items including brand and restaurant foods, real-time calculation and display of dietary subtotals in relation to daily goals, and saving commonly eaten meals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a previous study, participants reported self-monitoring was often time-consuming and burdensome, which often led them to record at the end of the day or days later.
“In a previous study of participants who used PR, participants reported that self-monitoring was often time-consuming and burdensome (26), which often led them to record at the end of the day or days later (27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese findings suggest that use of an electronic diary facilitates improved self-monitoring; however, use of an electronic diary plus daily tailored feedback was related to the best weight loss.
“These findings suggest that use of an electronic diary facilitates improved self-monitoring; however, the use of an electronic diary plus a daily feedback message that was tailored to what had been entered in the diary was related to the best weight loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The paper record is the most commonly used method of self-monitoring.
“However, the most often-used method of self-monitoring continues to be the paper record (PR)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Feedback from a paper record is available only to the extent that the person records and calculates sub-totals.
“Moreover, the feedback that is received from a PR is only present to the degree that the person records and calculates sub-totals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Paper records do not permit immediate, real-time external feedback.
“Furthermore, PRs do not permit immediate, real-time external feedback to support and motivate the individual.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Feedback, both reinforcing and corrective, enhances motivation toward goal attainment.
“This finding is consistent with the behavioral principles that document that feedback, both reinforcing feedback and corrective or redirective feedback, enhances motivation toward goal attainment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For many individuals, an online diary may limit accessibility and does not allow checking nutrient content before eating.
“However, for many individuals, use of an online diary may limit accessibility and does not permit one to check the nutrient content of foods prior to eating.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an RCT of 210 overweight and obese adults, the PDA plus daily feedback condition achieved a mean percent weight loss of 6.5, compared with 4.8 for PDA monitoring only and 4.6 for paper-based monitoring.
“Compared to the monitoring only conditions which obtained a percent weight loss of 4.8 (PDA) and 4.6 (paper-based), the PDA plus daily feedback condition obtained a mean percent weight loss of 6.5.”
From Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? (2011) · cites this paper as [34]
Most smoking and weight loss mobile interventions provided some form of just-in-time response based on a prior input, but the frequency or intensity of interactivity varied substantially.
“Most of the smoking and weight loss mobile interventions provided some form of “just-in-time” response based on a prior input, but the frequency or intensity of interactivity varied substantially among these interventions”
From Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? (2011) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Discussion claims a significant between-group weight-loss difference
MajorThe discussion describes weight loss in the PDA+FB group as significantly greater, but the results state that weight loss did not differ significantly among groups. A separate result about the proportion reaching a weight-loss threshold does not establish a significant difference in weight loss itself.
“The significantly greater weight loss in our PDA+FB group suggests that the combined self-monitoring and feedback message delivered in real-time and on a daily basis might have provided the reinforcement and sustained motivation that was needed to improve weight loss.”
“At 6 months, the percent mean [SD] weight loss was statistically significant (P< 0.01) for all treatment groups (PR 5.3% [5.9]%; PDA 5.5% [7.0]%; and PDA+FB 7.3% [6.6]%), with no significant differences among the groups.”
Example includes a value excluded by the adherence rule
MinorThe stated rule requires more than 50% of the weekly calorie goal. In the example, 4200 is exactly 50% of 8400, yet the example counts it as adherent.
“If the weekly record indicated that a participant consumed more than 50% of the weekly calorie goal, the participant was defined as adherent to self-monitoring for that week.”
“For example, a participant with a daily calorie goal of 1200 (weekly goal = 8400 kcal) would be adherent to self-monitoring if the person recorded consuming ≥ 4200 calories for that week.”
Weight-loss success threshold alternates between strict and inclusive
MinorThe methods define success as more than 5% weight loss, whereas the results count participants with at least 5% weight loss. These rules classify a participant who lost exactly 5% differently.
“Successful (clinically meaningful) weight change was defined as > 5% weight loss.”
“However, a higher proportion of participants in the PDA+FB group (63%) achieved ≥ 5% weight loss in comparison to the PR (46%) (P=0.04) and PDA (49%) (P=0.09) groups”
Cites
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,452 · see citing works
(1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,438 · see citing works
Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program
Tate, D. F. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.9.1172 · Cited by 925 · cited 1× · see citing works
“online was significantly related to weight loss (4).”
BackgroundRandomized Trial of Lifestyle Modification and Pharmacotherapy for Obesity
Wadden, T. A., Berkowitz, R. I., Womble, L. G., Sarwer, D. B., Phelan, S., Cato, R. K., Hesson, L. A., Osei, S. Y., Kaplan, R., & Stunkard, A. J. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa050156 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
Tate, D. F., Jackvony, E. H., & Wing, R. R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.14.1833 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Behavioral treatment of obesity
Butryn, M. L., Webb, V., & Wadden, T. A. (2011) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.006 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Obesity: Responding to the global epidemic.
Wadden, T. A., Brownell, K. D., & Foster, G. D. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.510 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Obesity: Responding to the global epidemic.
Wadden, T. A., Brownell, K. D., & Foster, G. D. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.3.510 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Tate, D. F., Jackvony, E. H., & Wing, R. R. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.15.1620 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Principles of behavioral analysis
Millenson, J. R. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Behavioral Treatment of Obesity
Wadden, T. A., Crerand, C. E., & Brock, J. (2005) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2004.09.008 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Self-monitoring may be necessary for successful weight control
Baker, R. C., & Kirschenbaum, D. S. (1993) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80212-6 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Effect of internet support on the long-term maintenance of weight loss
Harvey‐Berino, J., Pintauro, S., Buzzell, P., & Gold, E. C. (2004) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2004.40 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2008.
Pleis, J. R., Lucas, J. W., & Ward, B. W. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Behavioral Approaches to the Treatment of Obesity
Bray, G. A., & Bouchard, C. (2003) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14234-12 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Yon, B. A., Johnson, R. K., Harvey-Berino, J., Gold, B. C., & Howard, A. B. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9092-1 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Behavioral treatment of obesity.
Kirkland, K., & Ct, M. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-Monitoring Dietary Intake: Current and Future Practices
Burke, L. E., Warziski, M., Starrett, T., Choo, J., Music, E., Sereika, S., Stark, S., & Sevick, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Renal Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.jrn.2005.04.002 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationHelsel, D. L., Jakicic, J. M., & Otto, A. D. (2007) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.014 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Experiences of Self-Monitoring: Successes and Struggles During Treatment for Weight Loss
Burke, L. E., Swigart, V., Warziski Turk, M., Derro, N., & Ewing, L. J. (2009) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732309335395 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationHandbook of obesity—clinical applications
Levine, A. S. (2004) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.3.794a · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Weitzel, J. A., Bernhardt, J. M., Usdan, S., Mays, D., & Glanz, K. (2007) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.534 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationBurke, L., Acharya, Elci, Sereika, Music, Styn, & Turk (2009) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s5802 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing instrumented paper diaries to document self-monitoring patterns in weight loss
Burke, L. E., Sereika, S. M., Music, E., Warziski, M., Styn, M. A., & Stone, A. (2008) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2007.07.004 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationAccuracy of a PDA-based dietary assessment program
Beasley, J., Riley, W. T., & Jean-Mary, J. (2005) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2004.11.006 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Burke, L. E., Styn, M. A., Glanz, K., Ewing, L. J., Elci, O. U., Conroy, M. B., Sereika, S. M., Acharya, S. D., Music, E., Keating, A. L., et al. (2009) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.003 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationBaker, R. C., & Kirschenbaum, D. S. (1998) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.17.4.367 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Evaluation of a PDA-based dietary assessment and intervention program: a randomized controlled trial
Beasley, J. M., Riley, W. T., Davis, A., & Singh, J. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2008.10719701 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Improving Dietary Self-Monitoring and Adherence with Hand-Held Computers: A Pilot Study
Glanz, K., Murphy, S., Moylan, J., Evensen, D., & Curb, J. D. (2006) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-20.3.165 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationBurke, L. E., Warziski, M., Styn, M. A., Music, E., Hudson, A. G., & Sereika, S. M. (2008) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationGuare, J. C., Wing, R. R., Marcus, M. D., Epstein, L. H., Burton, L. R., & Gooding, W. E. (1989) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.12.7.500 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Changing Patient Behavior : Improving Outcomes in Health and Disease Management
Patterson, R. W. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., & Haines, A. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362 · Cited by 1,766 · see citing works
Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?
Riley, W. T., Rivera, D. E., Atienza, A. A., Nilsen, W., Allison, S. M., & Mermelstein, R. (2011) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Flodgren, G., Rachas, A., Farmer, A. J., Inzitari, M., & Shepperd, S. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002098.pub2 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Carter, M. C., Burley, V. J., Nykjaer, C., & Cade, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2283 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Burke, L. E., Ma, J., Azar, K. M. J., Bennett, G. G., Peterson, E. D., Zheng, Y., Riley, W., Stephens, J., Shah, S. H., Suffoletto, B., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000232 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Self-citationTurner-McGrievy, G. M., Beets, M. W., Moore, J. B., Kaczynski, A. T., Barr-Anderson, D. J., & Tate, D. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Mobile Applications for Weight Management
Azar, K. M. J., Lesser, L. I., Laing, B. Y., Stephens, J., Aurora, M. S., Burke, L. E., & Palaniappan, L. P. (2013) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.005 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing mHealth Technology to Enhance Self-Monitoring for Weight Loss
Burke, L. E., Styn, M. A., Sereika, S. M., Conroy, M. B., Ye, L., Glanz, K., Sevick, M. A., & Ewing, L. J. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.016 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
“The study design and methods for this 24-month RCT have been detailed elsewhere 17, 18 and thus are briefly reviewed here.”
MethodSelf-citationWeight loss—there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices?
Breton, E. R., Fuemmeler, B. F., & Abroms, L. C. (2011) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-011-0076-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Burke, L. E., Shiffman, S., Music, E., Styn, M. A., Kriska, A., Smailagic, A., Siewiorek, D., Ewing, L. J., Chasens, E., French, B., et al. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7138 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrating Technology Into Standard Weight Loss Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Spring, B., Duncan, J. M., Janke, E. A., Kozak, A. T., McFadden, H. G., DeMott, A., Pictor, A., Epstein, L. H., Siddique, J., Pellegrini, C. A., et al. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1221 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Deslippe, A. L., Soanes, A., Bouchaud, C. C., Beckenstein, H., Slim, M., Plourde, H., & Cohen, T. R. (2023) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-023-01424-2 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Rosen, D., & Silk, J. (2015) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445515595198 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-weighing in weight management: A systematic literature review
Zheng, Y., Klem, M. L., Sereika, S. M., Danford, C. A., Ewing, L. J., & Burke, L. E. (2015) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.20946 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationWieland, L. S., Falzon, L., Sciamanna, C. N., Trudeau, K. J., Brodney Folse, S., Schwartz, J. E., & Davidson, K. W. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007675.pub2 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Desroches, S., Lapointe, A., Ratté, S., Gravel, K., Légaré, F., & Turcotte, S. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008722.pub2 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Van Rhoon, L., Byrne, M., Morrissey, E., Murphy, J., & McSharry, J. (2020) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/2055207620914427 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Personalising nutritional guidance for more effective behaviour change
Celis-Morales, C., Lara, J., & Mathers, J. C. (2015) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665114001633 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
An evidence-based guide for obesity treatment in primary care.
Fitzpatrick, S. L., Wischenka, D., Appelhans, B. M., Pbert, L., Wang, M., Wilson, D. K., & Pagoto, S. L. (2016) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.07.015 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Project HELP: a Remotely Delivered Behavioral Intervention for Weight Regain after Bariatric Surgery
Bradley, L. E., Forman, E. M., Kerrigan, S. G., Goldstein, S. P., Butryn, M. L., Thomas, J. G., Herbert, J. D., & Sarwer, D. B. (2017) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2337-3 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Goldstein, S. P., Evans, B. C., Flack, D., Juarascio, A., Manasse, S., Zhang, F., & Forman, E. M. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-016-9627-y · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Forman, E. M., Goldstein, S. P., Crochiere, R. J., Butryn, M. L., Juarascio, A. S., Zhang, F., & Foster, G. D. (2019) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz137 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Rao, G., Burke, L. E., Spring, B. J., Ewing, L. J., Turk, M., Lichtenstein, A. H., Cornier, M.-A., Spence, J. D., Coons, M., & on behalf of the American Heart Association Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, P. A. A. M. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31822b9543 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationLieffers, J. R. L., Arocha, J. F., Grindrod, K., & Hanning, R. M. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2017.04.015 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Mining Health App Data to Find More and Less Successful Weight Loss Subgroups
Serrano, K. J., Yu, M., Coa, K. I., Collins, L. M., & Atienza, A. A. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5473 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Applying machine learning to predict future adherence to physical activity programs
Zhou, M., Fukuoka, Y., Goldberg, K., Vittinghoff, E., & Aswani, A. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0890-0 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Can Mobile Technology Improve Weight Loss in Overweight Adults? A Systematic Review
Wang, E., Abrahamson, K., Liu, P. J., & Ahmed, A. (2020) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945919888224 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Digital Health Solutions for Weight Loss and Obesity: A Narrative Review
Irvin, L., Madden, L. A., Marshall, P., & Vince, R. V. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15081858 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“[61] did find significant values for weight loss ≥5% in PDA + FB participants (63%) vs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDu, Y., Dennis, B., Rhodes, S. L., Sia, M., Ko, J., Jiwani, R., & Wang, J. (2020) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/21183 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Trottier, C. F., Lieffers, J. R. L., Johnson, S. T., Mota, J. F., Gill, R. K., & Prado, C. M. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/24534 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Damschroder, L. J., Buis, L. R., McCant, F. A., Kim, H. M., Evans, R., Oddone, E. Z., Bastian, L. A., Hooks, G., Kadri, R., White-Clark, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19216 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Frie, K., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Jebb, S., Oke, J., & Aveyard, P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15790 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Beckenstein, H., Slim, M., Kim, H., Plourde, H., Kilgour, R., & Cohen, T. R. (2021) · Cancer Reports · doi:10.1002/cnr2.1337 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dasgupta, K., Jarvandi, S., De Civita, M., Pillay, S., Hajna, S., Gougeon, R., Bader, A., & Da Costa, D. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114620 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Kim, H. K., Niederdeppe, J., Guillory, J., Graham, M., Olson, C., & Gay, G. (2015) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.905900 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burke, L. E., Conroy, M. B., Sereika, S. M., Elci, O. U., Styn, M. A., Acharya, S. D., Sevick, M. A., Ewing, L. J., & Glanz, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burke, Lora E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 338-344
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- PMC
- PMC3268702
- OpenAlex
- W2078339190
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 31.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (P30NR003924, P30-NR-03924, K24NR010742)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK71817, R01DK071817)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000056, UL1RR024153, 5 MO1 RR 00056)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- weight loss, personal digital assistants, dietary self-monitoring, feedback messages, paper diaries, waist circumference, energy intake, saturated fat intake, behavioral weight loss
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Energy Intake, Combined Modality Therapy, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Software, Weight Loss, Health Behavior, Exercise, Diet Records, Body Mass Index, Computers, Handheld, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review