Cited by 329Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The Effect of Electronic Self‐Monitoring on Weight Loss and Dietary Intake: A Randomized Behavioral Weight Loss Trial

Open access
Burke, Lora E., Conroy, Molly B., Sereika, Susan M., Elci, Okan U., Styn, Mindi A., Acharya, Sushama D., Sevick, Mary A., Ewing, Linda J. +1 more·2011·Obesity

Abstract

Technology may improve self‐monitoring adherence and dietary changes in weight loss treatment. Our study aimed to investigate whether using a personal digital assistant (PDA) with dietary and exercise software, with and without a feedback message, compared to using a paper diary/record (PR), results in greater weight loss and improved self‐monitoring adherence. Healthy adults (N = 210) with a mean BMI of 34.01 kg/m 2 were randomized to one of three self‐monitoring approaches: PR (n = 72), PDA with self‐monitoring software (n = 68), or PDA with self‐monitoring software and daily feedback messages (PDA+FB, n = 70). All participants received standard behavioral treatment. Self‐monitoring adherence and change in body weight, waist circumference, and diet were assessed at 6 months; retention was 91%. All participants had a significant weight loss (P < 0.01) but weight loss did not differ among groups. A higher proportion of PDA+FB participants (63%) achieved ≥5% weight loss in comparison to the PR group (46%) (P < 0.05) and PDA group (49%) (P = 0.09). Median percent self‐monitoring adherence over the 6 months was higher in the PDA groups (PDA 80%; PDA+FB 90%) than in the PR group (55%) (P < 0.01). Waist circumference decreased more in the PDA groups than the PR group (P = 0.02). Similarly, the PDA groups reduced energy and saturated fat intake more than the PR group (P < 0.05). Self‐monitoring adherence was greater in the PDA groups with the greatest weight change observed in the PDA+FB group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2010.208

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 31 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    A higher proportion of PDA+FB participants (63%) achieved at least 5% weight loss than PR participants (46%), P=0.04.

    “A higher proportion of PDA+FB participants (63%) achieved ≥5% weight loss in comparison to the PR group (46%) (P < 0.05)”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “a higher proportion of participants in the PDA+FB group (63%) achieved ≥ 5% weight loss in comparison to the PR (46%) (P=0.04)”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “A higher proportion of the PDA+FB group achieved a ≥ 5% weight loss than the PR and PDA groups”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Post hoc, the proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss differed significantly between PDA+FB and the combined PDA and PR groups (P=0.03).

    “Post hoc analyses revealed a significant difference in the proportion that achieved a ≥ 5% weight loss between the PDA+FB group and the combined PDA and PR groups (P = 0.03).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Adherence to self-monitoring over time did not differ significantly between PDA and PDA+FB groups (P=0.11).

    “There was no significant difference between the PDA and PDA+FB groups in adherence to self-monitoring over time (P = 0.11)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Adherence to self-monitoring over time was significantly higher in PDA and PDA+FB groups than in the PR group (P<0.01 for each).

    “adherence to self-monitoring over time was significantly higher in the PDA (P < 0.01) and PDA+FB (P < 0.01) groups compared to the PR group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Over the 6 months, adherence to self-monitoring was higher in PDA+FB (90%) and PDA (80%) than PR (55%), P<0.01.

    “Median percent self-monitoring adherence over the 6 months was higher in the PDA groups (PDA 80%; PDA+FB 90%) than in the PR group (55%) (P < 0.01).”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “The overall median adherence to self-monitoring for the entire study period of 6 months was better in the PDA groups than in the PR group; the proportion of sample adherent was 90%, 80% and 55% in the PDA+FB, PDA and PR groups, respectively (P < 0.01).”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Our study revealed that a significantly greater proportion of participants in the PDA and the PDA+FB groups self-monitored compared to those in the PR group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The decline observed in this study is slightly less than in a previous trial, and the decline in PDA groups was significantly less than in the PR group.

    “The decline that we observed in this study is slightly less than what we observed in a previous trial (23) and most important, the decline in the PDA groups was significantly less than what was observed in the PR group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adherence to self-monitoring physical activity was higher in PDA groups than PR: PR recorded 2.2 entries/week, PDA 2.7, PDA+FB 3.2 (P=0.006); post hoc PR was less adherent than combined PDA groups (P=0.007).

    “On average, the PR group recorded 2.2 (1.8) entries per week over the 6-month period compared to the PDA group recording 2.7 (1.8) and the PDA+FB group recording 3.2 (1.8) entries per week (P = 0.006). Post hoc analyses revealed that the PR group was significantly less adherent than the combined PDA and PDA+FB groups (P = 0.007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Waist circumference decreased significantly within each group (P<0.01) and differed significantly among groups (P=0.03); post hoc combined PDA groups had greater percent decrease than PR (P=0.02).

    “Percent median [IQR] waist circumference also decreased significantly (P < 0.01) within each group (PR −4.0% [−8.4, 0.0]%; PDA −5.0% [−8.5, −1.7]% and PDA+FB −6.4% [−11.5, −1.8]%) and was significantly different among groups (P = 0.03).”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “Post hoc analyses revealed a significant difference in percent waist circumference change between the PDA groups and the PR group (P = 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 6 months, all three self-monitoring groups achieved statistically significant mean weight loss, and mean weight loss did not differ significantly among the groups.

    “All participants had a significant weight loss (P < 0.01) but weight loss did not differ among groups.”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “At 6 months, the percent mean [SD] weight loss was statistically significant (P< 0.01) for all treatment groups (PR 5.3% [5.9]%; PDA 5.5% [7.0]%; and PDA+FB 7.3% [6.6]%), with no significant differences among the groups.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
      “This study demonstrated that participants who used a PR, a PDA with dietary and exercise software or a PDA with the same software and a daily, tailored feedback message achieved significant weight loss at 6 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Total energy intake decreased significantly in all three groups (P=0.05); combined PDA groups reduced total energy (P=0.03) and saturated fat (P=0.03) intake more than PR.

    “Total energy intake (median [IQR]) decreased significantly among the three groups (PR −12.5 [−34.7, 0.0]%; PDA −19.9 [−39.2, −1.6]%; and PDA+FB −23.3 [−40.6, −8.3]% (P = 0.05). The combined PDA group reduced total energy (P = 0.03) and saturated fat (P = 0.03) intake more than the PR group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss was higher in PDA+FB (63%) than PDA (49%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.09).

    “and PDA group (49%) (P = 0.09)”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “and PDA (49%) (P=0.09) groups”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Use of technological devices might have been a barrier for some individuals; however, participants who were technologically naive were able to learn how to use the device.

    “Use of technological devices might have been a barrier for some individuals; however, participants who were technologically naive were able to learn how to use the device.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All three treatment groups received the same standard behavioral intervention, differing only in self-monitoring tool.

    “All 3 treatment groups received the same standard behavioral intervention”
    • Also stated in: § Study design · plain
      “All participants received a 24-month standard behavioral weight loss treatment and were randomly assigned to use 1 of 3 self-monitoring tools”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The feedback message functioned as a compass and as a source of more frequent attention, which was a powerful reinforcer.

    “The feedback message functioned as a compass that enabled the individual to stay on course toward the goal; it also functioned as a source of more frequent attention that `someone' was noticing what the participant was doing, which was another powerful reinforcer”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomly assigned, stratified by gender and ethnicity, to one of three self-monitoring modes.

    “The participants were randomly assigned, stratified by gender and ethnicity, to 1 of the 3 different modes of self-monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    No one has examined the use of PDAs with dietary and exercise software for self-monitoring in behavioral weight loss treatment.

    “Despite the proliferation of hand-held devices, no one has examined the use of PDAs with dietary and exercise software for self-monitoring in behavioral weight loss treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It was unclear why improved adherence in PDA without feedback did not lead to greater weight loss than observed; this may suggest a more central role for individualized feedback to goal attainment.

    “it was unclear why the improved adherence in the PDA without feedback group did not lead to a greater weight loss than what we observed. This may suggest a more central role for individualized feedback to goal attainment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Tate's study, the automatic computer feedback group was comparable in weight loss to human e-mail counseling at 3 months; at 6 months, e-mail counseling had significantly greater weight loss than computer-automated feedback or no counseling.

    “While the group receiving the automatic computer feedback messages was comparable in weight loss to the human e-mail counseling group at 3 months; at 6 months, the e-mail counseling group had significantly greater weight loss than the computer-automated feedback group or no counseling group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two previous studies reported a significant association between number of diaries completed and weight loss, but neither reported a group difference in weight loss.

    “Two previous studies addressed self-monitoring methods and reported a significant association between the number of diaries completed and weight loss; however, neither of them reported a group difference in weight loss (20, 21).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study design was for 24-month final testing; results presented were for 6 months and only revealed short-term outcomes.

    “the study design was for a 24-month final testing of the hypothesis; the results presented here were for 6 months and thus only revealed the short-term outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In that later study, weight loss between groups was comparable at 3 months, but the e-mail message group lost significantly more weight at 6 months.

    “Weight loss between the groups was comparable at 3 months; however, the group that received the e-mail message lost significantly more weight at 6 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    This was the first large randomized clinical trial to compare different self-monitoring methods in behavioral weight loss and to compare PDAs with paper diaries.

    “This was the first large randomized clinical trial to compare different methods of self-monitoring in a behavioral weight loss intervention and to compare the use of PDAs to conventional paper diaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a pilot study, women in a diet modification trial given PDAs for self-monitoring with feedback significantly increased self-monitoring and more often achieved dietary goals.

    “In a pilot study where women in a diet modification trial were given personal digital assistants (PDAs) for self-monitoring with feedback, participants significantly increased their self-monitoring and more often achieved dietary goals (14).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The standard behavioral intervention has been successfully used in multiple studies.

    “All 3 treatment groups received the same standard behavioral intervention, which has been successfully used in multiple studies (8, 17, 18).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attention and guidance from the standard behavioral intervention facilitated weight loss across all groups, making the difference by self-monitoring method less pronounced than expected.

    “The attention and guidance received through the standard behavioral intervention facilitated weight loss across all groups and thus the difference by method of self-monitoring was less pronounced than what was expected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The decline in self-monitoring over time has been a consistent finding in several studies.

    “This decline in self-monitoring over time has been a consistent finding in several studies (12, 22).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study had 91% retention at 6 months and 21.4% minority representation.

    “An additional strength was our 91% retention rate at 6 months and the 21.4% minority representation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    91% (n=192) completed the 6-month assessment, with no differences in race, gender, age, weight or BMI between completers and non-completers.

    “Ninety-one percent (n = 192) completed the 6-month assessment with no differences in race, gender, age, weight or BMI between completers and non-completers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a 4-week diet-focused weight loss trial comparing PDA to PR, dietary adherence was significantly higher in PDA (43%) than PR (28%); adherence to the self-monitoring method was not reported.

    “In a 4-week, diet-focused weight loss trial that compared PDA for self-monitoring to PR, dietary adherence was significantly higher in the PDA group (43%) compared to the PR group (28%) (15); adherence to the self-monitoring method was not reported.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Analyses were performed using the intention-to-treat principle regardless of adherence and retention.

    “Analyses were performed using the intention-to-treat principle regardless of the participant's adherence and retention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Sensitivity analyses omitting outliers did not change the results, supporting robustness.

    “When outliers were omitted via sensitivity analysis, the results did not change, supporting the robustness of our findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    No clinical trials have examined the use of a PDA to deliver a tailored feedback message in response to recorded behavior.

    “Moreover, no clinical trials have examined the use of a PDA to deliver a tailored feedback message in response to the recorded behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Tate and colleagues showed that the number of weekly diaries submitted online was significantly related to weight loss.

    “Tate and colleagues showed that the number of weekly diaries submitted online was significantly related to weight loss (4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Missing data were handled by baseline value carried forward imputation.

    “Missing data were handled by a baseline value carried forward imputation approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many individuals do not make the connection between self-monitoring and behavior change easily, which probably contributes to stopping self-monitoring.

    “However, many individuals do not make that connection easily, which probably contributes to their stopping self-monitoring”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Benefits of using the PDA included portability, immediate access to a USDA database, real-time calculation and display of dietary subtotals, and saving commonly eaten meals.

    “benefits of using the PDA included its portability and immediate access to a U.S. Dept. of Agriculture database containing 5000 to 6000 food items including brand and restaurant foods, real-time calculation and display of dietary subtotals in relation to daily goals, and saving commonly eaten meals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a previous study, participants reported self-monitoring was often time-consuming and burdensome, which often led them to record at the end of the day or days later.

    “In a previous study of participants who used PR, participants reported that self-monitoring was often time-consuming and burdensome (26), which often led them to record at the end of the day or days later (27).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [26] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These findings suggest that use of an electronic diary facilitates improved self-monitoring; however, use of an electronic diary plus daily tailored feedback was related to the best weight loss.

    “These findings suggest that use of an electronic diary facilitates improved self-monitoring; however, the use of an electronic diary plus a daily feedback message that was tailored to what had been entered in the diary was related to the best weight loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The paper record is the most commonly used method of self-monitoring.

    “However, the most often-used method of self-monitoring continues to be the paper record (PR)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Feedback from a paper record is available only to the extent that the person records and calculates sub-totals.

    “Moreover, the feedback that is received from a PR is only present to the degree that the person records and calculates sub-totals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Paper records do not permit immediate, real-time external feedback.

    “Furthermore, PRs do not permit immediate, real-time external feedback to support and motivate the individual.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Feedback, both reinforcing and corrective, enhances motivation toward goal attainment.

    “This finding is consistent with the behavioral principles that document that feedback, both reinforcing feedback and corrective or redirective feedback, enhances motivation toward goal attainment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For many individuals, an online diary may limit accessibility and does not allow checking nutrient content before eating.

    “However, for many individuals, use of an online diary may limit accessibility and does not permit one to check the nutrient content of foods prior to eating.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an RCT of 210 overweight and obese adults, the PDA plus daily feedback condition achieved a mean percent weight loss of 6.5, compared with 4.8 for PDA monitoring only and 4.6 for paper-based monitoring.

    “Compared to the monitoring only conditions which obtained a percent weight loss of 4.8 (PDA) and 4.6 (paper-based), the PDA plus daily feedback condition obtained a mean percent weight loss of 6.5.”
  • Most smoking and weight loss mobile interventions provided some form of just-in-time response based on a prior input, but the frequency or intensity of interactivity varied substantially.

    “Most of the smoking and weight loss mobile interventions provided some form of “just-in-time” response based on a prior input, but the frequency or intensity of interactivity varied substantially among these interventions”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Discussion claims a significant between-group weight-loss difference

    Major

    The discussion describes weight loss in the PDA+FB group as significantly greater, but the results state that weight loss did not differ significantly among groups. A separate result about the proportion reaching a weight-loss threshold does not establish a significant difference in weight loss itself.

  • Example includes a value excluded by the adherence rule

    Minor

    The stated rule requires more than 50% of the weekly calorie goal. In the example, 4200 is exactly 50% of 8400, yet the example counts it as adherent.

  • Weight-loss success threshold alternates between strict and inclusive

    Minor

    The methods define success as more than 5% weight loss, whereas the results count participants with at least 5% weight loss. These rules classify a participant who lost exactly 5% differently.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, L. E., Conroy, M. B., Sereika, S. M., Elci, O. U., Styn, M. A., Acharya, S. D., Sevick, M. A., Ewing, L. J., & Glanz, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Burke, Lora E.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
338-344
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2078339190
Cited by
329
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
31.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (P30NR003924, P30-NR-03924, K24NR010742)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK71817, R01DK071817)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000056, UL1RR024153, 5 MO1 RR 00056)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
weight loss, personal digital assistants, dietary self-monitoring, feedback messages, paper diaries, waist circumference, energy intake, saturated fat intake, behavioral weight loss
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Energy Intake, Combined Modality Therapy, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Software, Weight Loss, Health Behavior, Exercise, Diet Records, Body Mass Index, Computers, Handheld, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review