Cited by 172Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Self-Monitoring Dietary Intake: Current and Future Practices

Burke, Lora E., Warziski, Melanie, Starrett, Terry, Choo, Jina, Music, Edvin, Sereika, Susan, Stark, Susan, Sevick, Mary Ann·2005·Journal of Renal Nutrition

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the use of paper diaries for self-monitoring food intake, identifies the strengths and limitations of paper-and-pencil diaries and their new counterpart, the electronic diary or personal digital assistant (PDA), and reports how participants were trained to use a PDA with dietary software in two pilot studies--one with hemodialysis patients and the other with participants in a weight loss study. The report of the pilot studies focuses on the practical issues encountered in training participants in the use of a PDA and addresses the pros and cons of different dietary software programs. Six hemodialysis patients were trained in the first study and seven participants attempting to lose or maintain their weight were trained in the second pilot study. The training focused on how to use a PDA and how to navigate the dietary software to self-monitor food intake. The goals of using the PDA were to improve adherence to the therapeutic diets and to self-monitoring. Lessons learned from the pilot studies are shared.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrn.2005.04.002

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, L. E., Warziski, M., Starrett, T., Choo, J., Music, E., Sereika, S., Stark, S., & Sevick, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Burke, Lora E.
Venue
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
281-290
ISSN
1051-2276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085912188
Cited by
172
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Renal Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30dk046204-15)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (P30NR003924, P30-NR-03924)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases ((DK 046204, R01-DK58631, R01DK058631)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000056, 5 M01 RR00056)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food diary, electronic diary, personal digital assistants, hemodialysis patients, dietary therapy, weight loss, participant training
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Diet, Educational Status, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Paper, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Self Care, Software, Diet Records, Bias, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review