Cited by 41Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Association between the BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism and Chronicity of Depression

Open access
Lee, Yujin, Lim, Shinn Won, Kim, Soo Yeon, Chung, Jae Won, Kim, Jinwoo, Myung, Woojae, Song, Jihae, Kim, Seonwoo +2 more·2013·Psychiatry Investigation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Both clinical and biological factors influence the course of depressive disorders. This study tested for associations between the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene at the Val66Met locus and the course of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Three hundred ten Korean subjects (209 patients, 101 controls) were genotyped for rs6265 at nucleotide 196 (G/A), which produces an amino acid substitution at codon 66 (Val66Met) of the gene for BDNF. Course of illness was evaluated both by chronicity of current episode (episode duration >24 months) and by the lifetime history of recurrences. RESULTS: Patients with the Met/Met BDNF genotype had a significantly higher rate of chronic depression than all others. There was a significant dose effect of the Met allele on chronicity. Compared with the Val/Val genotype, the relative risk of chronicity was 1.67 for the Val/Met genotype, and 2.58 for the Met/Met genotype. Lifetime history of recurrent episodes was not related to BDNF genotypes but was significantly associated with younger age of onset and with a history of depression in first degree relatives. CONCLUSION: BDNF genotyping may be informative for anticipating chronicity in major depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4306/pi.2013.10.1.56

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People, particularly males, with the BDNF Val66Met single nucleotide polymorphism are more likely to experience chronic depression.

    “people (particularly males) with the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met single nucleotide polymorphism—a condition that reduces activity-dependent BDNF release (20)—are more likely to experience chronic depression (21, 22)”

    From Psychedelics and Other Psychoplastogens for Treating Mental Illness. (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results (Chronicity and recurrent tendencies) report higher rates of chronic depression among patients with major depressive disorder carrying the Met allele, with the highest rate in the Met/Met group. The paper does not establish that the association is particularly strong in males; its Results (Subject characteristics) report no significant sex difference between patients with and without chronicity. The finding also concerns chronicity among patients already diagnosed with depression, not the general likelihood of developing depression. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]First MB Gibbon M Spitzer RL Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Clinical Version (SCID-CV) 1997 Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press, Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, Y., Lim, S. W., Kim, S. Y., Chung, J. W., Kim, J., Myung, W., Song, J., Kim, S., Carroll, B. J., & Kim, D. K.
Affiliations
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Samsung Biomedical Research Institute (KR)
  • Pacific Behavioral Research Foundation, Carmel, CA, USA.
Corresponding author
Kim, Doh Kwan
Venue
Psychiatry Investigation
Published
2013
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
56
ISSN
  • 1738-3684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1976-3026
OpenAlex
W2120473358
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Samsung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, major depressive disorder, chronic depression, clinical course, depression recurrence, age of onset, family history of depression, genetic susceptibility, dosage effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review