Cited by 210Mycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodProbiotics and Fermented FoodsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Ability of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium Strains to Remove Aflatoxin B1 from the Chicken Duodenum

Open access
El-Nezami, Hani, Mykkänen, Hannu, Kankaanpää, Pasi, Salminen, Seppo, Ahokas, Jorma·2000·Journal of Food Protection

Abstract

The ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains GG and LC-705 to remove AFB1 from the intestinal luminal liquid medium has been tested in vivo using a chicken intestinal loop technique. In this study, the GG strain of L. rhamnosus decreased AFB1 concentration by 54% in the soluble fraction of the luminal fluid within 1 min. This strain was more efficient in binding AFB1 compared with L. rhamnosus strain LC-705 (P < 0.05) that removed 44% of AFBl under similar conditions. Accumulation of AFB1 into the intestinal tissue was also determined. There was a 74% reduction in the uptake of AFB1 by the intestinal tissue, in the presence of L. rhamnosus strain GG compared with 63% and 37% in the case of Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and L. rhamnosus strain LC-705, respectively. The complexes formed in vitro between either L. rhamnosus strain GG or L. rhamnosus strain LC-705 and AFB1 were stable under the luminal conditions for a period of 1 h.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4315/0362-028x-63.4.549

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hsieh, P. H., and J. J. Wong. 1994. Pharmacokinetics and excretion of aflatoxins, p. 73-88. In D. L. Eaton and J. D. Groopman (ed.), The toxicology of aflatoxins: human health, veterinary, and agricultural significance. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
  2. Rodricks, J. V., and L. Stoloff. 1977. Aflatoxin residues from contam- inated feed in edible tissues of food producing animals, p. 75-89. In J. V. Rodricks, C. W. Hesseltine, and M. A. Mehlman (ed.), Myco- toxins in human and animal health. Pathotox. Publ., Park Forest South, Ill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Nezami, H., Mykkänen, H., Kankaanpää, P., Salminen, S., & Ahokas, J.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Ahokas, Jorma
Venue
Journal of Food Protection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
549-552
ISSN
0362-028X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1567106189
Cited by
210
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Protection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
aflatoxin B1, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, mycotoxin binding, mycotoxin removal, intestinal loops, probiotics, aflatoxin detoxification
MeSH terms
Animals, Chickens, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Duodenum, Lactobacillus, Propionibacterium, Aflatoxin B1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review