Cited by 490Marine and coastal ecosystemsPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Limitation of marine phytoplankton reproductive rates by zinc, manganese, and iron1

Open access
Brand, Larry E., Sunda, William G., Guillard, Robert R. L.·1983·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

The reproductive rates of 21 species of marine phytoplankton were measured in media in which free zinc, manganese, and iron ion activities were controlled at different levels using EDTA‐trace metal ion buffer systems. In general, the reproductive rates of neritic species were limited by zinc activities below 10‒11.5 M, while those of oceanic species were either not limited or only slightly limited at the lowest zinc activity attained in the experiment, ca. 10‒13 M. The reproductive rates of oceanic coccolithophores were either not limited or only slightly limited by the lowest manganese ion activity attained, ca. 10‒11 M, but those of a neritic coccolithophore and all diatoms, both neritic and oceanic, were limited below a manganese activity of 10‒10 M. Neritic species had reduced reproductive rates in media containing <10‒7 M iron while oceanic species reproduced at maximal or close to maximal rates in the media with the lowest iron concentrations, ca. 10‒9 M. The habitat‐related patterns in zinc, manganese, and iron requirements of oceanic and neritic species are consistent with the oceanic‐neritic distributions of concentrations of these metals. This similarity in requirement and distributional patterns provides evidence that Zn, Mn, and Fe availability have been important selective forces on marine phytoplankton populations and communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1983.28.6.1182

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paleomarine Zn reservoir was on the order of 10 nM, several orders of magnitude above the biolimiting concentration of about 10^-13 M and in excellent agreement with the black shale record.

    “Zn reservoir on the order of 10 nM.This value is several orders of magnitude above the ~10 -13 M concentration considered as biolimiting (Brand et al., 1983) and in excellent agreement with the black shale record”

    From Trace elements at the intersection of marine biological and geochemical evolution (2016) · cites this paper as Brand et al., 1983

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. PIOTROWICZ, S. R., G. R. HARVEY, M. SPRINCER- YOUNG, R. A. COURANT, ANDD. A. BORAN. 1983. Studies of cadmium, copper, and zinc complex- ation by marine fulvic and humic materials in seawater using anodic stripping voltametry, p. 699-718. In Trace metals in sea water. NATO Conf. Ser. 4, Mar. Sci.: v. 9. Plenum.
  2. SUNDA, W. G. 1975. Relationship between cupric ion activity and the toxicity of copper to phy- toplankton. Ph.D. thesis, Mass. Inst. Technol. 169
  3. TREFRY, J. H. 1981. A review of existing knowl- edge on trace metals in the Gulf of Mexico, p. 225-259. Zn Environmental research needs in the Gulf of Mexico. Symp. Proc. U.S. NOAA Atl. Oceanogr. Meteorol. Lab., Miami, Fla.
  4. WAITE, T. D. 1983. The photoredox properties of iron in natural waters. Ph.D. thesis, Mass. Inst. Technol. Submitted: 19 November 1982 Accepted: 4 May 1983

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brand, L. E., Sunda, W. G., & Guillard, R. R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences (US)
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1182-1198
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2168684271
Cited by
490
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Limnology and Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
marine phytoplankton, reproductive rate, zinc, manganese, iron, trace metal limitation, coccolithophores, diatoms, neritic species, oceanic species, selective forces, phytoplankton distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review