Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 615

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in particulate matter of lakes and oceans

Open access
Hecky, R. E., Campbell, P., Hendzel, L. L.·1993·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

The mean carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents of particulate material for 51 lakes or lake basins, extending from arctic to tropical climatic regions, including small lakes as well as the largest lakes in the world, indicate that Redfield ratios are the exception rather than the rule in freshwater. The C : P and N : P ratios are more variable for lake particles but generally higher than marine particles, and the mean molar C : N, C : P, and N : P ratios are substantially higher than the Redfield ratio of 106 : 16: 1. On average, lower C : N, C : P, and N : P ratios occur in subarctic lakes while higher ratios occur in the tropics and in temperate, oligotrophic lakes on the Canadian Shield. In shield lakes with long residence times (>6 months) the high ratios of C : N, C : P, and N : P do not originate from streamborne or atmospherically deposited particles but arise from in‐lake processes. Regression analysis demonstrates that small lakes are generally more N and P deficient than large lakes. In freshwaters, particulate composition ratios imply that a wide variety of conditions exists in lakes, including N and P deficiency, as well as N and P sufficiency. In the Experimental Lakes Area of Canada, independent physiological nutrient status indicators generally agree with the status indicated by seston ratios. The relative uniformity of marine C : N : P composition (compared to lakes) at the Redfield ratio suggests that marine plankton cannot be as severely, or as frequently, limited by N and P as lake plankton. Consequently, the paradigm of N limitation in the oceans requires qualification. Based on particulate composition, it is more correct to say that ocean plankton is not as N and P deficient as lake plankton.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1993.38.4.0709

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 615

Metadata

Authors
Hecky, R. E., Campbell, P., & Hendzel, L. L.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-06
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
709-724
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2011018492
Cited by
615
References
25
FWCI
14.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in particulate matter of lakes and oceans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1993.38.4.0709
The paper
Hecky, R. E., Campbell, P., & Hendzel, L. L. (1993). The stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in particulate matter of lakes and oceans. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1993.38.4.0709

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.