Cited by 99Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Moderators, mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy

Kazdin, Alan E.·2014·Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the ideas first presented in Wasserman Rachel H regarding the application and value of G-theory for psychotherapy research. Generalizability theory (G-theory) provides a framework within which multiple sources of measurement error can be simultaneously evaluated thus improving the accuracy of reliability estimates and providing critical information for modification and improvement of coding procedures. In an analogous fashion to classical test theory and the application of ICCs, G-theory further distinguishes between decisions based on the relative standing or ranking of individuals relative interpretations and decisions based on the absolute level of their scores. Facets are considered random when the size of the sample is much smaller than the size of the universe and the sample is considered to be interchangeable with any other sample of the same size drawn from the universe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203386071-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazdin, A. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kazdin, Alan E.
Venue
Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Psychotherapy Research
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-01-03
Pages
87-101
OpenAlex
W2952377786
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.38
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
generalizability theory, measurement error, reliability estimation, coding procedures, inter-rater reliability, psychotherapy research, mediators and moderators, mechanisms of change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review