The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding Minority Ethnic Achievement
Abstract
Providing fresh insights and understandings about educationally ‘successful’ minority ethnic pupils, this book examines the views, identities and educational experiences of those pupils who are undoubtedly ‘achieving’, but who tend to remain ignored within popular concerns about under-achievement. Combining a broad analysis of minority ethnic pupils’ achievement together with a novel, detailed case study of an educationally ‘successful’ group, the British-Chinese, this book examines a fascinating angle on debates about the reproduction of social inequalities. In this thought-provoking and highly accessible book, the authors: review the theoretical and policy context to issues of ‘race’, gender, social class and achievement discuss the role of teachers and schools explore Chinese parents’ views of their children’s education and explain how these families ‘produce’ and support achievement investigate British-Chinese pupils’ views on their approaches to learning and their educational identities examine the relationship between aspirations and educational achievement consider the complexity and subtlety of racisms experienced by ‘successful’ minority ethnic pupils. This timely and authoritative book contributes to the ongoing debates about levels of achievement among minority ethnic pupils and is an essential book for all researchers, students, education professionals and policy-makers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The two young men have clearly experienced the well-documented stereotypical assumptions of Chinese students that they are good at maths and science (Archer and Francis 2006).”
From Translanguaging as a political stance: implications for English language education (2022) · cites this paper as Archer and Francis 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21227 · Cited by 807
Self-citationArcher, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J. F., Dillon, J. S., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20399 · Cited by 668
Self-citationThe new neoliberal subjects? Young/er academics’ constructions of professional identity
Archer, L. (2008) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680930701754047 · Cited by 419
Self-citationArcher, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013) · Pedagogy, Culture & Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.748676 · Cited by 308
Self-citationTranslanguaging as a political stance: implications for English language education
Wei, L. (2022) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccab083 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, L., & Francis, B.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2006-09-25
- OpenAlex
- W4205720641
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- ethnic minority students, academic performance, educational inequality, racism in schools, parental involvement, educational aspirations, educational identity, teacher role, Chinese parents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review