The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Blue and Brown Books
Abstract
This chapter explains comment on the views on language, mind and reality set forth in the two very important transitional works called respectively, from the colour of the wrappers in which they were informally circulated, The Blue Book and The Brown Book . These two books are really sets of notes which Wittgenstein used for his classes in the early 1930s, after his return to Cambridge from Austria, and which he distributed in the form of stencilled hand-outs. The Blue Book further contains treatments of solipsism and the problem of other minds which show how deeply Wittgenstein continued to experience philosophical puzzlement in that quarter, and also a view of philosophy as a quest for new fundamental notations which will bring out affinities. The Brown Book likewise contains a much fuller account of language-games than the Investigations, and a more revealing account of the ways in which Wittgenstein conceived that his language-games were taught.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881
The parent–infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., & Target, M. (2007) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01727.x · Cited by 555
What is self-specific? Theoretical investigation and critical review of neuroimaging results
Legrand, D., & Ruby, P. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014172 · Cited by 470
Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Moran, G., Steele, H., & Higgitt, A. (1993) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/000306519304100403 · Cited by 299
WHY BEHAVIOR ANALYSTS SHOULD STUDY EMOTION: THE EXAMPLE OF ANXIETY
Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1998) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-137 · Cited by 240
Redström, J. (2008) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.001 · Cited by 157
Ramoglou, S. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106090 · Cited by 106
How Did Chinese Medicine Become Experiential? The Political Epistemology of Jingyan
Lei, S. H.-L. (2002) · positions: asia critique · doi:10.1215/10679847-10-2-333 · Cited by 69
(2005) · Journal of Consciousness Studies · Cited by 62
Human Goals Are Constitutive of Agency in Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Popa, E. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00483-2 · Cited by 45
(2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511974052 · Cited by 42
AHMED, A. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000234 · Cited by 5
Prioritizing practice in the study of religion: normative and descriptive orientations
Burley, M. (2018) · International Journal of Philosophy and Theology · doi:10.1080/21692327.2017.1344135 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Venue
- Wittgenstein
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-06-03
- Pages
- 124-162
- OpenAlex
- W1825555684
- Cited by
- 1,268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 792.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.