The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese
Abstract
This book is the first study to examine how interactional style develops within the walls of a foreign language classroom in the first two years of language study. Results show learners to be highly sensitive to pragmatic information and that learners can move toward an appropriate interactional style through classroom interactive experience. The book shows how learners are most often sources who offer assistance and correction, with errors serving most often to stimulate further thinking about what form is correct. Analysis shows learners to be active in seeking corrective information in the classroom setting, not only from peer partners but also from the teacher. They are active in noticing how the teacher's utterances--even when addressed to others--contrast with their own, and utilize corrective feedback intended for other students. In addition, the results show that teacher-initiated corrective feedback addressed to individual learners is only one source of corrective feedback. Learners are shown to be active in both teacher-fronted and peer interactive settings. In newer L2 teaching methodologies which focus on the use of peer interactive tasks, the teacher's role has been de-emphasized. This book, however, shows how important the teacher's role is. The final chapter examines how the teacher can act to maximize the benefits of peer interactive tasks through how they design tasks and present them to the class. First, the chapter looks at how learners use English--their L1--in the classroom, concluding that how teachers present activities to the class has an impact on the amount of L1 used by students during peer interaction. Following up on this finding, the chapter works to address questions that teachers face in lesson planning and teaching. It presents a useful list of questions teachers can ask when designing peer interactive tasks in order to maximize the effectiveness of a wide variety of language learning tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810383328 · Cited by 355
The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form
Williams, J. (2001) · System · doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(01)00022-7 · Cited by 280
Participant Orientations in German Conversation‐for‐Learning
Kasper, G. (2004) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x · Cited by 262
Still talking to ourselves after all these years: a review of current research on private speech
Winsler, A. (2009) · Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581533.003 · Cited by 183
Toth, P. D. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00441.x · Cited by 149
Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention
Sato, M. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x · Cited by 142
Teachers' accounts of learners' engagement and disaffection in the language classroom
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2022) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2020.1800067 · Cited by 83
10. A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.11rou · Cited by 81
3. Interaction or collaboration? Group dynamics in the foreign language classroom
Sato, M., & Viveros, P. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.04sat · Cited by 50
1. Peer interaction and learning: A focus on the silent learner
Fernández-Dobao, A. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.02fer · Cited by 46
Ebadi, S., & Asakereh, A. (2017) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2017.1419796 · Cited by 29
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2014) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168813519885 · Cited by 24
Rezai, A., Naserpour, A., & Rahimi, S. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2086575 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohta, A. S.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4205216735
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.