The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cooperation and the Use of Technology
Abstract
We live in an historical period in which knowledge is the most critical resource for social and economic development and people need to be able to participate in a networked, information-based society. Whereas previously people engaged in manufacturing-based work where they generally competed with or worked independently of each other, now people en-gage in information- and technological-rich work where they work in teams. People need to be able to work collaboratively in designing, using, and maintaining the tools of technology. Technology and teamwork will continuously play a larger role in most people’s lives. Children, adolescents, and young adults have no choice but to develop and increase their technologi-cal and teamwork literacy. There is no better place for them to begin than in school. Learning in cooperative groups while utilizing the tools of technology should occur at all grade levels
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923649709526970 · Cited by 2,005
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Cited by
ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875 · Cited by 1,885
Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2016) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720816634228 · Cited by 768
Dickey, M. D. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-8806-y · Cited by 321
Effects of Small-Group Learning on Transfer: a Meta-Analysis
Pai, H.-H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9260-8 · Cited by 140
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2003) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i3.1843 · Cited by 126
Developing teachers' telecollaborative competences in online experiential learning
Vinagre, M. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.002 · Cited by 102
Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps
Ucgul, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2014) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9253-9 · Cited by 67
Chuang, H.-H. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9438-5 · Cited by 61
Shi, Y., Frederiksen, C. H., & Muis, K. R. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.007 · Cited by 43
Involving Users to Improve the Collaborative Logical Framework
Santos, O. C., & Boticario, J. G. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/893525 · Cited by 25
Mohamad Said, M. N. H., Forret, M., & Eames, C. (2014) · Jurnal Teknologi · doi:10.11113/jt.v68.2910 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.
- Published
- 2013-01-11
- Pages
- 777-803
- OpenAlex
- W2598316382
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 81.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
