The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions
Abstract
Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions proposes an attribution theory of interpersonal or social motivation that distinguishes between the role of thinking and feeling in determining action. The place of this theory within the larger fields of motivation and attributional analyses is explored. It features new thoughts concerning social motivation on such topics as help giving, aggression, achievement evaluation, compliance to commit a transgression, as well as new contributions to the understanding of social justice. Included also is material on moral emotions, with discussions of admiration, contempt, envy, gratitude, and other affects not considered in Professor Weiner's prior work. The text also contains previously unexamined topics regarding social inferences of arrogance and modesty.Divided into five chapters, this book:*considers the logical development and structure of a proposed theory of social motivation and justice;*reviews meta-analytic tests of the theory within the contexts of help giving and aggression and examines issues related to cultural and individual differences; *focuses on moral emotions including an analysis of admiration, envy, gratitude, jealousy, scorn, and others;*discusses conditions where reward decreases motivation while punishment augments strivings; and*provides applications that are beneficial in the classroom, in therapy, and in training programs.This book appeals to practicing and research psychologists and advanced students in social, educational, personality, political/legal, health, and clinical psychology. It will also serve as a supplement in courses on motivational psychology, emotion and motivation, altruism and/or pro-social behavior, aggression, social judgment, and morality. Also included is the raw material for 13 experiments relating to core predictions of the proposed attribution theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Development of an Attribution-Based Theory of Motivation: A History of Ideas
WEINER, B. (2010) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903433596 · Cited by 868
Self-citationAn attributional theory of motivation
Graham, S. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101861 · Cited by 341
A systematic review of the impact of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer outcomes
Chambers, S. K., Dunn, J., Occhipinti, S., Hughes, S., Baade, P., Sinclair, S., Aitken, J., Youl, P., & O’Connell, D. L. (2012) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-184 · Cited by 258
Jones-Jang, S. M., & Park, Y. J. (2022) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmac029 · Cited by 178
Kunesh, C. E., & Noltemeyer, A. (2019) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085915623337 · Cited by 113
Communication about health disparities in the mass media
Niederdeppe, J., Bigman, C. A., Gonzales, A. L., & Gollust, S. E. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12003 · Cited by 83
Emotions as signals of normative conduct
Hareli, S., Moran-Amir, O., David, S., & Hess, U. (2013) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.791615 · Cited by 65
Maeder, E. M., Yamamoto, S., & Saliba, P. (2015) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2014.915325 · Cited by 52
Generating Credibility in Crisis: Will an AI-Scripted Response Be Accepted?
Ray, E. C., Merle, P. F., & Lane, K. (2025) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2024.2435494 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiner, B.
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2006-04-21
- OpenAlex
- W4254652417
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.