The DOI matches its DataCite record; 14 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Active Learning for Classification and Preference Learning
Open accessAbstract
Information theoretic active learning has been widely studied for probabilistic models. For simple regression an optimal myopic policy is easily tractable. However, for other tasks and with more complex models, such as classification with nonparametric models, the optimal solution is harder to compute. Current approaches make approximations to achieve tractability. We propose an approach that expresses information gain in terms of predictive entropies, and apply this method to the Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC). Our approach makes minimal approximations to the full information theoretic objective. Our experimental performance compares favourably to many popular active learning algorithms, and has equal or lower computational complexity. We compare well to decision theoretic approaches also, which are privy to more information and require much more computational time. Secondly, by developing further a reformulation of binary preference learning to a classification problem, we extend our algorithm to Gaussian Process preference learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also used to guide methods that require exploration like active learning [53], continual learning [92], Bayesian optimisation [47], and reinforcement learning [58].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The epistemic term I x is BALD's acquisition score [Houlsby et al., 2011]”
From Decomposing LLM-Judge Uncertainty to Target Expert Labels (2026) · cites this paper as Houlsby et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Seung, H., Opper, M., & Sompolinsky, H. (1992) · Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130417 · Cited by 2,193 · cited 2×
“Perhaps the most ubiquitous is active learning for SVMs [Tong and Koller, 2001, Seung et al., 1992], where the volume of Version Space (VS) is used as a proxy for the posterior entropy.”
BackgroundMethodNear-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes
Guestrin, C., Krause, A., & Singh, A. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102385 · Cited by 1,906 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
On a measure of the information provided by an experiment
Lindley, D. V. (1956) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 2×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundMethodInformation-based objective functions for active data selection
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 2×
“We no longer need to build our entropy calculation around the type of posterior approximation (as in [MacKay, 1992, Krishnapuram et al., , Lawrence et al., 2003]) but are free to choose from many of the available algorithms.”
BackgroundMethodExpected Information as Expected Utility
Bernardo, J. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344689 · Cited by 705 · cited 1×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundPreference learning with Gaussian processes
Chu, W., & Ghahramani, Z. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102369 · Cited by 504 · cited 4×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationNear-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost
Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Gupta, A., & Kleinberg, J. (2006) · 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1127777.1127782 · Cited by 489 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
BackgroundPairwise Preference Learning and Ranking
Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (2003) · European Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39857-8_15 · Cited by 295 · cited 1×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
MethodMaximum entropy sampling and optimal bayesian experimental design
Sebastiani, P., & Wynn, H. P. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00225 · Cited by 243 · cited 1×
“Information Theoretic approaches: Maximum Entropy Sampling (MES) [Sebastiani and Wynn, 2000] explicitly works in dataspace (Eqn.”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 981
Robust recognition and exploratory analysis of crystal structures via Bayesian deep learning
Leitherer, A., Ziletti, A., & Ghiringhelli, L. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26511-5 · Cited by 51
Active Learning: Problem Settings and Recent DevelopmentsPreprint
Hino, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.04225 · Cited by 55
“Houlsby et al. (2011) proposed a method of issuing queries under a Bayesian setting where the entropy of the predicted values is high and the expected entropy of predicted values for the parameter posterior distribution of the prediction model is low (i.e., low uncertainty of predicted values with…”
MethodDomain-Independent Extraction of Scientific Concepts from Research Articles
Brack, A., D’Souza, J., Hoppe, A., Auer, S., & Ewerth, R. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45439-5_17 · Cited by 60
“We prefer it over its contemporary, Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [22] , since it has less computational requirements.”
BackgroundTraining Data Subset Search With Ensemble Active Learning
Chitta, K., Álvarez, J. M., Haußmann, E., & Farabet, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3133268 · Cited by 45
“…sample as its entropy [50]: 2) Mutual Information: , also called BALD and Jensen-Shannon Divergence, explicitly looks for large disagreement between the models (i.e., model uncertainty ) [28], [51]: where p ( e ) denotes the prediction of an individual member of the ensemble before marginalization.”
BackgroundIntelligent labeling based on fisher information for medical image segmentation using deep learning
Sourati, J., Gholipour, A., Dy, J. G., Tomas-Fernandez, X., Kurugol, S., & Warfield, S. K. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2907805 · Cited by 50
“Other information gain measures have been proposed to address shortcomings of US, such as mutual information between unlabeled samples and the model parameters [7], [14], [15], which, however, did not improve uncertainty results for CNNs, and mutual information between query candidates and unlabeled samples [16], whic…”
BackgroundNot All Labels Are Equal: Rationalizing The Labeling Costs for Training Object Detection
Elezi, I., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Leal-Taixe, L., & Alvarez, J. M. (2021) · arXiv · Cited by 50
Yan, Z., Yang, H., & Zha, H. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01008 · Cited by 35
“05) and a BALD [29] score to quantify the prediction uncertainty.”
BackgroundInfluentialPop, R., & Fulop, P. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.03897 · Cited by 51
“BALD uncertainty results for this approach are evidenced in Figure 4.”
BackgroundInfluentialBayesian Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Gaussian Processes
Riis, C., Antunes, F., Hüttel, F. B., Azevedo, C. L., & Pereira, F. C. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/068431-0882 · Cited by 49
“Another distinction between the acquisition functions is decision-based and information theory-based [Houlsby et al., 2011].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUncertainty-aware Self-training for Text Classification with Few LabelsPreprint
Mukherjee, S., & Awadallah, A. H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.15315 · Cited by 50
“Prior works have leveraged various measures to sample instances based on predictive entropy [Shannon, 2001], variation ratios [Freeman, 1965], standard deviation and more recently based on model uncertainty like Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [Houlsby et al., 2011].”
Data Shapley Valuation for Efficient Batch Active Learning
Ghorbani, A., Zou, J., & Esteva, A. (2022) · Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC) · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf56349.2022.10064696 · Cited by 29
“More recent approaches take a Bayesian approach and usually focus on approximating the parameter posterior [16].”
On the Importance of Effectively Adapting Pretrained Language Models for Active Learning
Margatina, K., Barrault, L., & Αλέτρας, Ν. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.93 · Cited by 39
“…not predicting the most confident class, in descending order, E NTROPY (Shannon, 1948) selects samples that maximize the predictive entropy, and BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), short for Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement, chooses data points that maximize the mutual information be-tween…”
BackgroundDEAL: Deep Evidential Active Learning for Image Classification
Hemmer, P., Kühl, N., & Schoeffer, J. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla51294.2020.00141 · Cited by 13
“In this context, Kirsch et al. (2019) [21] improve the performance of the acquisition function BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Diverse) [17] in the batch setting (BatchBALD).”
BackgroundAn Informative Path Planning Framework for Active Learning in UAV-Based Semantic Mapping
Rückin, J., Magistri, F., Stachniss, C., & Popović, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2023.3313811 · Cited by 39
“To measure model uncertainty, we utilise Bayesian active learning by disagreement [61], which computes the mutual”
MethodBayesian Variational Autoencoders for Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection
Daxberger, E., & Hernández-Lobato, J. M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.05651 · Cited by 45
“We then approximate the mutual information score 4 proposed by Houlsby et al. (2011) N x ∈ D q ( z | x , φ ) , i.e., a uniform mixture of N Gaussians in our case ( qz ) 5 (Mahmood & Hern´andez-Lobato, 2019).”
MethodInducing Point Allocation for Sparse Gaussian Processes in High-Throughput Bayesian Optimisation
Moss, H. B., Ober, S. W., & Picheny, V. (2023) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.10123 · Cited by 45
“Starting from a random initial design of 100 evaluations, we then use the BALD acquisition function of Houlsby et al. (2011) to sequentially improve our model over 10 data acquisition steps, each time collecting evaluations at 100 informative locations then updating the classification surrogate…”
MethodCoppock, H., Nicholson, G., Kiskin, I., Koutra, V., Baker, K., Budd, J., Payne, R., Karoune, E., Hurley, D., Titcomb, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00773-8 · Cited by 35
Zhang, M., & Plank, B. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.04282 · Cited by 45
“One popular example is stochastic regularisation techniques such as dropout during inference time, known as the Monte Carlo Dropout technique (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
InfluentialStochastic Batch Acquisition: A Simple Baseline for Deep Active Learning
Kirsch, A., Farquhar, S., Atighehchian, P., Jesson, A., Branchaud-Charron, F., & Gal, Y. (2021) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12059 · Cited by 45
“While many acquisition schemes are designed to acquire labels one at a time (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017), recent work has highlighted the importance of batch acquisition (Kirsch et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHumBugDB: A Large-scale Acoustic Mosquito Dataset
Kiskin, I., Sinka, M., Cobb, A. D., Rafique, W., Wang, L., Zilli, D., Gutteridge, B., Dam, R., Marinos, T., Li, Y.-P., et al. (2021) · NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07607 · Cited by 45
“Positive predictions are then filtered by the probability, mutual information and predictive entropy [Houlsby et al., 2011], screened, and stored in a curated database.”
ROIAL: Region of Interest Active Learning for Characterizing Exoskeleton Gait Preference LandscapesPreprint
Li, K., Tucker, M., Biyik, E., Novoseller, E. R., Burdick, J., Sui, Y.-N., Sadigh, D., Yue, Y., & Ames, A. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9560840 · Cited by 45
“The vast majority of prior work on preference learning obtains at most 1 bit of information per preference query [6]–[8], [14]–[22].”
BackgroundSemantic Segmentation with Active Semi-Supervised Learning
Rangnekar, A., Kanan, C., & Hoffman, M. J. (2022) · IEEE Workshop/Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00591 · Cited by 44
Online Machine Learning Audiometry
Barbour, D., Howard, R., Song, X., Metzger, N., Sukesan, K. A., DiLorenzo, J. C., Snyder, B., Chen, J. Y., Degen, E. A., Buchbinder, J. M., et al. (2018) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000669 · Cited by 44
“After an initial random tone delivery, each new tone in this study was selected according to the principle of Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) (Garnett et al., 2013; Houlsby et al., 2011).”
MethodUncertainty quantification in fine-tuned LLMs using LoRA ensemblesPreprint
Balabanov, O. S., & Linander, H. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.12264 · Cited by 29
Jesson, A., Tigas, P., van Amersfoort, J. R., Kirsch, A., Shalit, U., & Gal, Y. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02275 · Cited by 42
“Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [18] defines an acquisition function based on epistemic uncertainty.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdversarial Phenomenon in the Eyes of Bayesian Deep LearningPreprint
Rawat, A., Wistuba, M., & Nicolae, M.-I. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.08244 · Cited by 43
“This has been previously utilised in the context of active learning in the works of [23] and [16].”
MethodBayesian Preference Elicitation with Language Models
Handa, K., Gal, Y., Pavlick, E., Goodman, N. D., Andreas, J., Tamkin, A., & Li, B. Z. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.05534 · Cited by 41
“…line of work on optimal experimental design, such as dueling bandits (Heckel et al., 2019) and Bayesian preference learning approaches (Foster et al., 2019; Gal et al., 2017; Houlsby et al., 2011), has developed methods to efficiently infer user preferences from a limited number of interactions.”
BackgroundData-Centric Graph Learning: A Survey
Guo, Y., Bo, D., Yang, C. H., Lu, Z., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Peng, Y., & Shi, C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2024.3489412 · Cited by 36
“[197] uses a greedy algorithm to find a data x that maximizes the reduction of model entropy and labels it.”
BackgroundMethodKirsch, A., & Gal, Y. (2022) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.00549 · Cited by 41
“The expected information gain is a popular acquisition function in Bayesian optimal experimental design (Lindley, 1956) and in active learning, where it is also known as BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExploring Active 3D Object Detection from a Generalization Perspective
Luo, Y.-D., Chen, Z., Wang, Z.-J., Yu, X., Huang, Z., & Baktash, M. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.09249 · Cited by 40
“Recent works (Liu et al., 2021; Citovsky et al., 2021; Kirsch et al., 2019; Houlsby et al., 2011) combine the aforementioned heuristics: they measure uncertainty as the gradient magnitude of samples (Ash et al.”
BackgroundActive Surrogate Estimators: An Active Learning Approach to Label-Efficient Model Evaluation
Kossen, J., Farquhar, S., Gal, Y., & Rainforth, T. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.06881 · Cited by 40
“For active learning, BALD [27] is an established acquisition strategies that acquires points with high epistemic uncertainty [13, 34].”
Diversity Enhanced Active Learning with Strictly Proper Scoring Rules
Tan, W., Du, L., & Buntine, W. L. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14171 · Cited by 40
“Compared with BALD, MOCU and WMOCU, the advantage of using strictly proper scoring rules in BEMPS is that they generalise expected errors to expected scores, which can be tailored for different inference tasks.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPosition: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model AgentsPreprint
Kirchhof, M., Kasneci, G., & Kasneci, E. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22655 · Cited by 27
“Epistemic uncertainty via disagreement (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017; Kirsch, 2024) Epistemic uncertainty is how much the possible models disagree about the outputs.”
Second-Order Uncertainty Quantification: A Distance-Based Approach
Sale, Y., Bengs, V., Caprio, M., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00995 · Cited by 39
“…and conditional entropy for specifying explicit quantities for the total (TU), aleatoric (AU), and epistemic (EU) uncertainties associated with a predictive second-order distributions Q ∈ P ( P ( Y )) (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal, 2016; Depeweg et al., 2018; Smith and Gal, 2018; Mobiny et al., 2021).”
Enhancing trustworthiness in ML-based network intrusion detection with uncertainty quantification
Talpini, J., Sartori, F., & Savi, M. (2023) · Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments · doi:10.1007/s40860-024-00238-8 · Cited by 39
“(3) (in this case the sum runs over the number of trees of the forest), to estimate the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, and to make RF inherently uncertainty-aware.”
Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models
Schweighofer, K., Aichberger, L., Ielanskyi, M., Klambauer, G., & Hochreiter, S. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03217 · Cited by 39
“…obtain the following probability of selecting a class: The total uncertainty is commonly measured as the entropy of this probability distribution [Houlsby et al., 2011, Gal, 2016, Depeweg et al., 2018, Hüllermeier and Waegeman, 2021]: We can reformulate the total uncertainty as the expected…”
BackgroundDeep Deterministic Uncertainty for Semantic SegmentationPreprint
Mukhoti, J., van Amersfoort, J. R., Torr, P., & Gal, Y. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.00079 · Cited by 39
“The softmax distributions p ( y | x , ˆ ω ) obtained from these forward passes can then be used to compute either predictive entropy et al., 2011) as measures of uncertainty.”
Guo, J., Shi, H., Kang, Y., Kuang, K., Tang, S., Jiang, Z., Sun, C., Wu, F. Q., & Zhuang, Y. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00289 · Cited by 45
“Uncertainty-based sampling [17, 13, 8, 10, 21] and distribution-based sampling [18, 32, 47, 33] are common methods in the pool-based scenario.”
MethodControversial stimuli: pitting neural networks against each other as models of human recognition
Golan, T., Raju, P. C., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.09288 · Cited by 38
“Ideally, information-theoretic experimental design [28, 29] would approach this problem by formulating our beliefs regarding which model is correct as a posterior probability distribution, conditioned on observed or hypothetical stimuli and responses.”
BackgroundDeep Active Learning with Noise Stability
Li, X.-J., Yang, P., Wang, T.-Y., Zhan, X.-Y., Xu, M., Dou, D., & Xu, C. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.13340 · Cited by 37
“The baseline methods include Random selection, Entropy, Least Margin, BALD (Houlsby et al. 2011; Gal, Islam, and Ghahra-mani 2017), QBC (Kuo et al. 2018), As shown in Figure 1, our method ( NoiseStability ) out-performs or is comparable to the best baselines at all active learning cycles.”
MethodExploring Diversity-Based Active Learning for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving
Lin, J.-P., Liang, Z., Deng, S., Cai, L.-L., Jiang, T., Li, T.-R., Jia, K., & Xu, X. (2022) · IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems (Print) · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3463801 · Cited by 37
“The success of these deep learning-based methods heavily depends on large-scale annotated datasets, which are both time-consuming and costly to produce.”
BackgroundInhibited Softmax for Uncertainty Estimation in Neural NetworksPreprint
Możejko, M., Susik, M., & Karczewski, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.01861 · Cited by 31
“Beside AI safety, uncertainty is useful in the active learning setting in which the data collection process is expensive or time consuming [Houlsby et al., 2011, Rottmann et al., 2018].”
BackgroundActive Learning for Visual Question Answering: An Empirical StudyPreprint
Lin, X., & Parikh, D. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.01732 · Cited by 36
“According to BALD [7], the conditional entropy term H(A|ω) in Eq.”
BackgroundMethodActiveLLM: Large Language Model-Based Active Learning for Textual Few-Shot Scenarios
Bayer, M., Lutz, J., & Reuter, C. (2026) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl.a.63 · Cited by 15
“Grießhaber et al. [10] also examine the impact of active learning on BERT, focusing on the BALD by Houlsby et al. [11] strategy with Monte Carlo Dropout (MCDO).”
Active Prompt Learning in Vision Language Models
Bang, J., Ahn, S., & Lee, J.-G. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02550 · Cited by 19
Towards a statistical theory of data selection under weak supervision
Kolossov, G., Montanari, A., & Tandon, P. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.14563 · Cited by 35
Lüth, C., Bungert, T. J., Klein, L., & Jaeger, P. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/075280-0428 · Cited by 35
“BALD: This uncertainty-based QM uses the mutual information between the class label and the model parameters with regard to each sample for greedy selection [27], it was introduced with dropout for deep bayesian active learning[19].”
MethodDeep Multi-Fidelity Active Learning of High-dimensional OutputsPreprint
Li, S., Kirby, R. M., & Zhe, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.00901 · Cited by 18
“The other one is BALD (Bayesian active learning by disagreement) (Houlsby et al., 2011), namely the mutual information between the label and model parameters, I[y,θ|x,D] = H[y|x,D]− Ep(θ”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialActiveHARNet: Towards On-Device Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Human Activity RecognitionPreprint
Gudur, G. K., Sundaramoorthy, P., & Umaashankar, V. (2019) · EMDL '19 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.00108 · Cited by 34
“In BALD, pool points are chosen that maximize the mutual information between predictions and model posterior [7].”
BackgroundProactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty
Hahn, M., Zeng, W., Kannen, N., Galt, R., Badola, K., Kim, B., & Wang, Z. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.06771 · Cited by 33
“…, efficient data acquisition has been extensively studied for many problems, including active learning (Cohn et al., 1996; Gal et al., 2017; Houlsby et al., 2011; Ren et al., 2021; Settles, 2009; Wang et al., 2018), Bayesian optimization (Auer, 2002; Garnett, 2023; Hennig and Schuler,…”
Shedding Light on Large Generative Networks: Estimating Epistemic Uncertainty in Diffusion Models
Berry, L., Brando, A., & Meger, D. (2024) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.18580 · Cited by 33
“The mutual information between model weights and output is a well-established metric for measuring epistemic uncertainty [Houlsby et al., 2011].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntroducing an Improved Information-Theoretic Measure of Predictive Uncertainty
Schweighofer, K., Aichberger, L., Ielanskyi, M., & Hochreiter, S. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08309 · Cited by 33
“The currently prevalent measure of predictive uncertainty is the entropy of the Bayesian model average (BMA) predictive distribution, where the epistemic component is given by the mutual information I [15, 10, 8, 17, 27].”
BackgroundUncertainty-Aware Dual-Evidential Learning for Weakly-Supervised Temporal Action Localization
Chen, M., Gao, J., & Xu, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3308571 · Cited by 29
“It has been an open problem to estimate the prediction uncertainty of deep neural networks efficiently and reliably in multiple scenarios, which include examples of selecting samples formanuallabelinginactivelearning[63]orguidingtheQ-value functionofagentsinreinforcementlearning[64].”
BackgroundGeometry and Uncertainty-Aware 3D Point Cloud Class-Incremental Semantic Segmentation
Yang, Y., Hayat, M., Jin, Z., Ren, C., & Lei, Y.-J. (2023) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02084 · Cited by 33
“We adopt Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [15] as our spatial sampling uncertainty estimation function on point cloud, as follows:”
MethodGeneral intelligence requires rethinking exploration
Jiang, M., Rocktäschel, T., & Grefenstette, E. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230539 · Cited by 23
“For instance, active learning selection functions, as well as those in curriculum learning, are largely based on choosing the next training sample to maximize the information-gain, or relatedly to reduce some notion of uncertainty over the model’s own predictions or variance in performance error [69,113].”
BackgroundInformation Aware max-norm Dirichlet networks for predictive uncertainty estimation
Tsiligkaridis, T. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.12.011 · Cited by 33
Leitherer, A., Yeo, B. C., Liebscher, C. H., & Ghiringhelli, L. M. (2023) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01133-1 · Cited by 39
Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernels
Mohamadi, M. A., Bae, W., & Sutherland, D. J. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.12569 · Cited by 32
“Tran et al. [39] improves BALD by adding a variational autoencoder and auxiliary classifier generative adversarial network, from which a synthesized data point x ′ similar to the queried image x ∗ is generated.”
MethodInfluentialActive Learning for Node Classification: An Evaluation
Madhawa, K., & Murata, T. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22101164 · Cited by 22
“On the other hand, entropy BALD are uncertainty-based acquisition functions that calculate an uncertainty metric using the performance of the classifier trained using the current training set.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdversarial Representation Active LearningPreprint
Mottaghi, A., & Yeung, S. Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.09720 · Cited by 27
“[12] proposed the Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) method in which the acquisition function is measured by the mutual information of the training examples with respect to the model parameters.”
From Risk to Uncertainty: Generating Predictive Uncertainty Measures via Bayesian EstimationPreprint
Kotelevskii, N., Kondratyev, V., Takác, M., Moulines, É., & Panov, M. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10727 · Cited by 31
“• Bregman Information (BI): which special case is BALD (Gal et al., 2017; Houlsby et al., 2011).”
InfluentialUncertainty Based Detection and Relabeling of Noisy Image LabelsPreprint
Köhler, J. M., Autenrieth, M., & Beluch, W. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.11876 · Cited by 27
“We compare different statistics over the predictions y = gWtm (x) given by the multiple forward passes, including BALD [14], Variation-Ratio, the standard deviation over the predictions std(gtm(x)) (averaged over all classes), and the mean over the predictions.”
MethodLabel-wise Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification
Sale, Y., Hofman, P., Löhr, T., Wimmer, L., Nagler, T., & Hüllermeier, E. (2024) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02354 · Cited by 30
“Popular approaches to uncertainty quantification in the literature [Houlsby et al., 2011, Gal, 2016, Depeweg et al., 2018, Smith and Gal, 2018, Mobiny et al., 2021] rely on information-theoretic measures derived from Shannon entropy [Shannon, 1948].”
Preferential Bayesian optimisation with skew gaussian processes
Benavoli, A., Azzimonti, D., & Piga, D. (2020) · GECCO Companion · doi:10.1145/3449726.3463128 · Cited by 30
“This definition of dueling information gain is an extension to preferences of the information gain, formulated for GP classifiers in [13].”
BackgroundBayesian active learning for production, a systematic study and a reusable libraryPreprint
Atighehchian, P., Branchaud-Charron, F., & Lacoste, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.09916 · Cited by 23
“A more sophisticated approach is BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), which estimates the epistemic uncertainty by computing the mutual information between the model posterior distribution and the prediction: I(y, w | x,DL) = H[y | x,DL]− Ep(w|DL)(H[y | x,w]).”
BackgroundHierarchical Gaussian Process Priors for Bayesian Neural Network WeightsPreprint
Karaletsos, T., & Bui, T. D. (2020) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.04033 · Cited by 30
Self-Correcting Bayesian Optimization through Bayesian Active Learning
Hvarfner, C., Hellsten, E., Hutter, F., & Nardi, L. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.11005 · Cited by 29
“We first introduce Statistical distance-based Active Learning (SAL), which improves Bayesian active learning by generalizing previous work [24, 48] and introduces a holistic measure of disagreement between the marginal posterior predictive distribution and each conditional posterior predictive.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesFormer: Transformer with Uncertainty EstimationPreprint
Sankararaman, K. A., Wang, S., & Fang, H. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.00826 · Cited by 38
“To test the effectiveness of the uncertainty estimates produced by the BayesFormer, we use the MCDropout [16] based BALD [18, 25] acquisition function (called MC-BALD) and compare it against two baselines: MC-BALD applied to the vanilla transformer model and random-sampling.”
MethodGeneDisco: A Benchmark for Experimental Design in Drug DiscoveryPreprint
Mehrjou, A., Soleymani, A., Jesson, A., Notin, P., Gal, Y., Bauer, S., & Schwab, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.11875 · Cited by 18
“Houlsby et al. (2011) frame active learning as looking to maximize the information gain about the model parameters if we observe the outcome Y = y given model inputs.”
BackgroundA Bayesian Framework for Information-Theoretic Probing
Pimentel, T., & Cotterell, R. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.229 · Cited by 16
Kirsch, A., Rainforth, T., & Gal, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.11719 · Cited by 17
“While Expected Information Gain focuses on the formulation of the mutual information term as a reduction in model posterior uncertainty given a potential sample, in active learning, BALD was introduced as an equivalent term which focuses on the predictive disagreement (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdaptive Nonparametric PsychophysicsPreprint
Owen, L. L. W., Browder, J., Letham, B., Stocek, G., Tymms, C., & Shvartsman, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09549 · Cited by 29
Active Learning with Bayesian UNet for Efficient Semantic Image Segmentation
Saidu, I. C., & Csató, L. (2021) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging7020037 · Cited by 29
“The entropy of a pixel BALD (Bayesian Active learning by disagreement) [27]: chooses the image that maximizes the mutual information between the standard prediction and posterior prediction of each pixel.”
BackgroundMethodWang, C.-Q., Sun, S.-Y., & Grosse, R. (2020) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.03178 · Cited by 29
“The Total Information Gain (TIG) (MacKay, 1992) is one acquisition function that has been used to benchmark predictive marginal uncertainty (Cohn et al., 1996; Houlsby et al., 2011; Hernández-Lobato et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2018; Gal et al., 2017; Beluch et al., 2018).”
MethodA Cost-Effective Framework for Preference Elicitation and Aggregation
Zhao, Z., Li, H.-M., Wang, J., Kephart, J., Mattei, N., Su, H., & Xia, L. (2018) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.05287 · Cited by 29
“Standard information criteria include D-optimality (used in [Houlsby et al., 2011, 2012, Pfeiffer et al., 2012]) and E-optimality.”
MethodPrioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learnt
Mindermann, S., Brauner, J., Razzak, M., Sharma, M., Kirsch, A., Xu, W., Höltgen, B., Gomez, A. N., Morisot, A., Farquhar, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07137 · Cited by 28
“We consider the following baselines, which select the top-k points using an acquisiton function, α ( x ) : • Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (Houlsby et al., 2011)”
MethodXu, Z.-J., Jin, R., Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z.-W., Zhao, J.-R., Gao, F., Gan, Z.-X., & Ding, W.-C. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127649 · Cited by 28
“Our quality evaluation purpose is to identify the viewpoints that can maximize the Information Gain [28]–[30] among the view-points x ∈ D candidate in comparison to D train , where D candidate represents the collection of candidate viewpoints: where H [ · ] is the entropy [29].”
Lee, H., & Li, W.-W. (2024) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114213 · Cited by 28
“On the other hand, for model uncertainty, Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD; Houlsby et al., 2011) acquisition function is utilized.”
MethodOccFusion: Depth Estimation Free Multi-sensor Fusion for 3D Occupancy Prediction
Zhang, J., Ding, Y.-R., & Liu, Z.-X. (2024) · Asian Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.05329 · Cited by 28
“Inspired by previous active learning research [10, 12, 19], which suggests that samples with high entropy require additional attention, our active occupancy decoder refines features only for coarse voxels with the highest entropy.”
Kuhar, S., Cheng, S., Chopra, S., Bronars, M., & Xu, D. (2023) · Conference on Robot Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.14196 · Cited by 28
“Preference learning is a form of supervised learning that learns rankings from pairwise comparisons [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].”
BackgroundTrieste: Efficiently Exploring The Depths of Black-box Functions with TensorFlow
Picheny, V., Berkeley, J., Moss, H. B., Stojić, H., Granta, U., Ober, S. W., Artemev, A., Ghani, K., Goodall, A., Paleyes, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.08436 · Cited by 28
“, 2021), as well as popular active learning methods for improved classification (Houlsby et al., 2011) or contour line estimation (Picheny et al.”
BackgroundMethodDeep Probabilistic Models to Detect Data Poisoning AttacksPreprint
Subedar, M. M., Ahuja, N., Krishnan, R., Ndiour, I. J., & Tickoo, O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01206 · Cited by 22
“We measure the model uncertainty using Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) [8], which quantifies mutual information between parameter posterior distribution and predictive distribution.”
MethodQuantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Proper Scoring RulesPreprint
Hofman, P., Sale, Y., & Hüllermeier, E. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.12215 · Cited by 27
“A principled approach to measuring and separating aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, which is now widely applied in machine learning (Houlsby et al., 2011; Depeweg et al., 2018; Mobiny et al., 2017), is based on a classical information-theoretic result, according to which entropy (of a random…”
BackgroundHuman-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses
Granley, J., Fauvel, T., Chalk, M., & Beyeler, M. (2023) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.13104 · Cited by 10
Randomness is the Root of All Evil: More Reliable Evaluation of Deep Active Learning
Ji, Y., Kaestner, D., Wirth, O., & Wressnegger, C. (2023) · IEEE Workshop/Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00393 · Cited by 27
“We discuss different aspects to the problem and analyze their in fl uence on AL performance using the example of BADGE [4], BALD [13], Core-Set [34], Entropy [35], ISAL [24], LC [23], and LLOSS [42]) and the random strategy.”
MethodHumBug – An Acoustic Mosquito Monitoring Tool for use on budget smartphones
Sinka, M. E., Zilli, D., Li, Y., Kiskin, I., Msaky, D., Kihonda, J., Mkandawile, G., Kaindoa, E. W., Killeen, G. F., Zanga, J., et al. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13663 · Cited by 41
Killestein, T. L., Lyman, J. D., Steeghs, D. T. H., Ackley, K., Dyer, M. J., Ulaczyk, K., Cutter, R., Mong, Y. L., Galloway, D. K., Dhillon, V. S., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab633 · Cited by 43
“This metric is equivalent the second term of the BALD acquisition function of Houlsby et al. (2011), and is chosen as it is pre-normalised to [0, 1] unlike standard deviation or similar metrics.”
MethodInfluentialPersonalizing Gesture Recognition Using Hierarchical Bayesian Neural Networks
Joshi, A., Ghosh, S., Betke, M., Sclaroff, S., & Pfister, H. (2017) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.56 · Cited by 27
“Further, we exploit the inferred posterior over weights to guide active learning [14] methods that significantly improve performance of the system in scenarios where labeling data is expensive.”
MethodDeep Active Learning for Computer Vision: Past and Future
Takezoe, R., Liu, X., Mao, S., Chen, M. T., Feng, Z., Zhang, S., & Wang, X. (2023) · APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1561/116.00000057 · Cited by 26
“BatchBALD takes this issue into account and makes itself more likely to acquire a diverse cover.”
BackgroundInfluentialDeep Bayesian Active Learning for Preference Modeling in Large Language Models
Melo, L. C., Tigas, P., Abate, A., & Gal, Y. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10023 · Cited by 26
“Bayesian Active Learning is an established form of active learning that leverages the uncertainty in model parameters to select the most informative points [14, 27, 16], demonstrating relevant impact in several applications [19, 18, 17, 28, 29].”
BackgroundAcquisition Conditioned Oracle for Nongreedy Active Feature Acquisition
Valancius, M., Lennon, M., & Oliva, J. B. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13960 · Cited by 26
Best Practices in Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation
Mittal, S., Niemeijer, J., Schäfer, J. P., & Brox, T. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54605-1_28 · Cited by 24
“BALD [17] is often used as baseline in existing works.”
MethodFine-Tuning Language Models via Epistemic Neural NetworksPreprint
Osband, I., Asghari, S. M., Roy, B. V., McAleese, N., Aslanides, J., & Irving, G. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.01568 · Cited by 22
“We define bald (Houlsby et al., 2011) priority based on the mutual information gain: gbald(θ, x) = H[p(·|θ, x)] −∫ z PZ(dz)H[p(·|θ, x, z)], Similarly, variance uses the variation in predicted probabilities, gvariance(θ, x) =∑ c ∫ z PZ(dz) (p(c|θ, x, z)− p(c|θ, x))2 .”
BackgroundInfluentialActive Few-Shot Learning with FASL
Müller, T., P'erez-Torr'o, G., Basile, A., & Franco-Salvador, M. (2022) · International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Data Bases · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.09347 · Cited by 26
“A line of research that we exclude are Bayesian approaches such as BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), because the requirement of a model ensemble makes them computationally inefficient.”
BackgroundSafe Active Learning for Multi-Output Gaussian Processes
Li, C.-Y., Rakitsch, B., & Zimmer, C. (2022) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.14849 · Cited by 26
“AL has been extensively investigated for classification tasks (Hoi et al., 2006; Joshi et al., 2009; Houlsby et al., 2011; Hahn et al., 2019; Shi and Yu, 2021), but less literature addresses AL in the regression setting (Krause et al., 2008; Garnett et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialActive Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibility
Noseworthy, M., Moses, C., Brand, I., Castro, S., Kaelbling, L., Lozano-Perez, T., & Roy, N. (2021) · Robotics: Science and Systems Conference · doi:10.15607/rss.2021.xvii.043 · Cited by 26
“The results show that our active methods which leverage the infeasible subsequence property , sequential and incremental , outperform random-ss . random-ss only outperforms greedy , showing that a random strategy is able to find more interesting training towers than a myopic approach which simply tries to maximize the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTowards Active Learning for Action Spotting in Association Football Videos
Giancola, S., Cioppa, A., Georgieva, J. V., Billingham, J., Serner, A., Peek, K., Ghanem, B., & Droogenbroeck, M. V. (2023) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00538 · Cited by 29
Multimodal Surprise Adequacy Analysis of Inputs for Natural Language Processing DNN Models
Kim, S., & Yoo, S. (2021) · International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test · doi:10.1109/ast52587.2021.00017 · Cited by 21
“Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) represents the mutual information between data points and the model weights [27].”
BackgroundBAR: Bayesian Activity Recognition using variational inferencePreprint
Krishnan, R., Subedar, M. M., & Tickoo, O. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.03305 · Cited by 20
“We compare predictive entropy and BALD [26] uncertainty measures for Bayesian Monte Carlo dropout and stochastic variational inference models.”
MethodA Unifying Framework for Sparse Gaussian Process Approximation using Power Expectation Propagation
Bui, T. D., Yan, J., & Turner, R. E. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.07066 · Cited by 25
“GPs have many elegant theoretical properties, but their use is greatly hindered by analytic and computational intractabilities.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlsby, N., Huszár, F., Ghahramani, Z., & Lengyel, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- arXiv
- 1112.5745
- OpenAlex
- W1872312298
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- Bayesian active learning, information gain, predictive entropy, Gaussian process classifier, preference learning, classification, nonparametric models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review