The DOI matches its DataCite record; 14 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Active Learning for Classification and Preference Learning
Open accessAbstract
Information theoretic active learning has been widely studied for probabilistic models. For simple regression an optimal myopic policy is easily tractable. However, for other tasks and with more complex models, such as classification with nonparametric models, the optimal solution is harder to compute. Current approaches make approximations to achieve tractability. We propose an approach that expresses information gain in terms of predictive entropies, and apply this method to the Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC). Our approach makes minimal approximations to the full information theoretic objective. Our experimental performance compares favourably to many popular active learning algorithms, and has equal or lower computational complexity. We compare well to decision theoretic approaches also, which are privy to more information and require much more computational time. Secondly, by developing further a reformulation of binary preference learning to a classification problem, we extend our algorithm to Gaussian Process preference learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also used to guide methods that require exploration like active learning [53], continual learning [92], Bayesian optimisation [47], and reinforcement learning [58].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The epistemic term I x is BALD's acquisition score [Houlsby et al., 2011]”
From Decomposing LLM-Judge Uncertainty to Target Expert Labels (2026) · cites this paper as Houlsby et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Seung, H., Opper, M., & Sompolinsky, H. (1992) · Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130417 · Cited by 2,193 · cited 2×
“Perhaps the most ubiquitous is active learning for SVMs [Tong and Koller, 2001, Seung et al., 1992], where the volume of Version Space (VS) is used as a proxy for the posterior entropy.”
BackgroundMethodNear-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes
Guestrin, C., Krause, A., & Singh, A. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102385 · Cited by 1,906 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
On a measure of the information provided by an experiment
Lindley, D. V. (1956) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 2×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundMethodInformation-based objective functions for active data selection
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 2×
“We no longer need to build our entropy calculation around the type of posterior approximation (as in [MacKay, 1992, Krishnapuram et al., , Lawrence et al., 2003]) but are free to choose from many of the available algorithms.”
BackgroundMethodExpected Information as Expected Utility
Bernardo, J. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344689 · Cited by 705 · cited 1×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundPreference learning with Gaussian processes
Chu, W., & Ghahramani, Z. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102369 · Cited by 504 · cited 4×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationNear-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost
Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Gupta, A., & Kleinberg, J. (2006) · 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1127777.1127782 · Cited by 489 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
BackgroundPairwise Preference Learning and Ranking
Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (2003) · European Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39857-8_15 · Cited by 295 · cited 1×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
MethodMaximum entropy sampling and optimal bayesian experimental design
Sebastiani, P., & Wynn, H. P. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00225 · Cited by 243 · cited 1×
“Information Theoretic approaches: Maximum Entropy Sampling (MES) [Sebastiani and Wynn, 2000] explicitly works in dataspace (Eqn.”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 981
Speeding Up BatchBALD: A k-BALD Family of Approximations for Active Learning
Kirsch, A. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.09490 · Cited by 3
“From an information-theoretic point of view, active learning means finding the unlabeled points in the pool set with the highest expected information gain, which is also referred to as BALD score (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundActive Learning Guided by Efficient Surrogate Learners
An, Y., Park, S., & Kim, K. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i10.28961 · Cited by 3
“…computed at stage 0, the inverse ( Q t ) − 1 at each subsequent stage t can be calculated from Discussion: Our approach draws inspiration from Bayesian AL methods that aim to minimize the entropy of the learner’s parameters and their approximations(e.g. (Houlsby et al. 2011; Kirsch et al. 2019)).”
BackgroundMethodDispersion‐enhanced sequential batch sampling for adaptive contour estimation
Che, Y., Müller, J., & Cheng, C.-Q. (2022) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.3245 · Cited by 3
“For instance, Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) selects the most critical design point according to the mutual information between the responses and model parameters.”
BackgroundLooking at the posterior: accuracy and uncertainty of neural-network predictions
Linander, H., Balabanov, O., Yang, H. T. Y., & Mehlig, B. (2023) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab4 · Cited by 1
“To evaluate the proposed acquisition function LEA, we use a simple active learning setup [50] where an ensemble of neural networks is first trained on a small class-balanced subset of 20 inputs from the CIFAR10 training set.”
BackgroundMethodWabina, R. S., & Silpasuwanchai, C. (2022) · Biomedical engineering and physics express · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/aca20b · Cited by 3
Batch Active Learning from the Perspective of Sparse Approximation
Shen, M., Jiang, B., Zhang, J. Y., & Koyejo, O. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.00246 · Cited by 3
“Dataset Bayesian Coreset Ours-Greedy Ours-IHT BALD Batch BALD Random Fashion MNIST 89.53± 0.25 89.83± 0.26 89.97± 0.23 89.72± 0.23 88.85± 0.22 88.39± 0.32 CIFAR10 77.73± 0.70 78.28± 0.53 77.55± 0.83 77.61± 0.59 76.12± 0.35 76.36± 0.59 CIFAR100 42.40± 0.29 42.53± 0.34 42.30± 0.29 41.99± 0.60 42.63± 0.40 42.10± 0.24 Fig…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEfficient labeling of retinal fundus photographs using deep active learning
Paul, S. K., Pan, I., & Sobol, W. (2022) · Journal of Medical Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.9.6.064001 · Cited by 3
Active Learning of Ordinal Embeddings: A User Study on Football Data
Loeffler, C., Fallah, K., Fenu, S., Zanca, D., Eskofier, B., Rozell, C., & Mutschler, C. (2022) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.12710 · Cited by 3
“Active Learning helps reduce the amount of labeled relative comparisons by querying the oracle with informative samples (Settles, 2009; Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInstance Selection Mechanisms for Human-in-the-Loop Systems in Few-Shot Learning
Jakubik, J., Blumenstiel, B., Vossing, M., & Hemmer, P. (2022) · Wirtschaftsinformatik · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.06835 · Cited by 3
PyRelationAL: a python library for active learning research and development
Scherer, P., Pouplin, A., Vecchio, A. D., SurajM, S., Bolton, O., Soman, J., Taylor-King, J., Edwards, L., & Gaudelet, T. (2022) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.11117 · Cited by 3
“(Houlsby et al. , 2011), which assesses information gain based on posterior uncertainty.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUncertainty-Based Network for Few-Shot Image Classification
Yuan, M.-L., Xu, Q., Cai, C., Zheng, Y.-D., Wang, T., Lu, T., & Li, W.-B. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo · doi:10.1109/icme52920.2022.9859887 · Cited by 3
Probabilistic learning for pulsar classification
Andrianomena, S. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/016 · Cited by 3
Duong, N., Almin, A., Lemarié, L., & Kiran, B. R. (2022) · VISIGRAPP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.02661 · Cited by 3
“Evaluating existing heuristic function, BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011) for the semantic segmenta- ar X iv :2 20 2.”
MethodInfluentialLST: Lexicon-Guided Self-Training for Few-Shot Text ClassificationPreprint
Kim, H., Son, J., & Han, Y.-S. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.02566 · Cited by 5
“UST adopts Bayesian active learning by disagreement [Houlsby et al., 2011] using stochastic dropouts to selectively sample unlabeled examples that maximize the information gain between predictions and the model posterior.”
Contextual Bayesian optimization with binary outputsPreprint
Fauvel, T., & Chalk, M. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.03447 · Cited by 3
“To do this, we used the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) algorithm, developed by Houlsby et al. (2011).”
InfluentialKnowledge-Driven Active Learning
Ciravegna, G., Precioso, F., Betti, A., Mottin, K., & Gori, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43412-9_3 · Cited by 5
“Standard uncertain strategies consist in choosing samples that maximize the prediction entropy (Houlsby et al., 2011; Cao & Tsang, 2021), the distance from the hyperplane in SVM (Schohn & Cohn, 2000), or the variation ratio in Query-by-committee with ensemble methods (Burbidge et al.”
BackgroundChoice functions based multi-objective Bayesian optimisation
Benavoli, A., Azzimonti, D., & Piga, D. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08217 · Cited by 3
“In [7], the authors showed that GP preference learning is equivalent to GP classification with a transformed kernel function.”
BackgroundKnowledge Modelling and Active Learning in Manufacturing
Rožanec, J., Novalija, I., Zajec, P., Kenda, K., & Mladenić, D. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.02298 · Cited by 3
“A variation toGAAL, and based on previous work by [93], [94] developed a Bayesian generative active deep learning approach, performing a joint training of the generator (a variational autoencoder) and the learner, which requires smaller sample sizes and a single training stage.”
MethodActive learning for medical code assignmentPreprint
Ferreira, M. D., Malyska, M., Sahar, N., Miotto, R., Paulovich, F., & Milios, E. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.05741 · Cited by 3
“Some studies concluded that BALD does not perform well with an imbalanced test set and in the first few samples [18, 24].”
BackgroundInformation Condensing Active LearningPreprint
Jain, S., Liu, G., & Gifford, D. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.07916 · Cited by 2
“They extend BALD to the batch setting for neural networks with BatchBALD (Kirsch et al., 2019).”
InfluentialMinimax Active Learning Via Minimal Model Capacity
Shayovitz, S., & Feder, M. (2019) · International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2019.8918907 · Cited by 3
“In the first part of this work an information theoretic active learning approach is proposed which unlike those in [9], [10] and [11] optimizes the expected log-loss regret of a test sample.”
BackgroundMethodAn Effective Data Refinement Approach for Upper Gastrointestinal Anatomy Recognition
Quan, L., Li, Y., Chen, X., & Zhang, N. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_5 · Cited by 2
SoQal: Selective Oracle Questioning for Consistency Based Active Learning of Cardiac Signals
Kiyasseh, D., Zhu, T.-T., & Clifton, D. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.09557 · Cited by 2
“These include Var Ratio, Entropy, and BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), definitions of which can be found in Appendix A.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBeyond Relevance: Bayesian Evidence Acquisition for Agentic Whole-Slide Image Reasoning
Wong, B., Xu, X., Fu, H.-Z., Chen, N. F., & Yi, M.-Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.05757 · Cited by 2
Evaluating Epistemic Uncertainty: Beyond OOD Detection and Active Learning
Paplhám, J., Waegeman, W., Hüllermeier, E., & Franc, V. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.14817 · Cited by 2
“Under the information-gain ob-jective [Houlsby et al., 2011], the optimal acquisition score is the mutual information | ∥ | D ] .”
When Can You Debias an LLM Judge? Identifiability Limits, a Test, and Designs for Top-k Ranking
Xu, J., Zeng, D., Paisley, J. W., & Zhao, Q. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.02104 · Cited by 2
“Our acquisition rule is a top-k -aware, bias-aware instance of Bayesian experimental design (Houlsby et al. 2011): it uses the posterior over membership in the top-k set, and it is computed under a judge model that contains nuisance bias parameters.”
Jin, S.-J., Wang, P.-X., Liu, B.-Y., Fan, X.-R., Li, S., Xi, Z.-H., Zhang, J.-Z., Zhou, Y., Gui, T., Zhang, Q., et al. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.03937 · Cited by 2
“This joint formulation is conceptually inspired by the aleatoric–epistemic uncertainty decomposition (Houlsby et al., 2011; Depeweg et al., 2018; Kendall and Gal, 2017), establishing distributional divergence and predictive confidence as complementary axes.”
Uncertainty Decomposition via Cyclical SG-MCMC and Soft-label Learning for Subjective NLP
Inoshita, K., & Ueno, T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.24773 · Cited by 2
“…annotator disagreement rate; (C4) acquisition quality in active learning—a natural context for Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD; Houlsby et al., 2011); and (C5) selective prediction via the Area Under the Risk-Coverage Curve (AURC) and mis-1 classification detection via the…”
InfluentialLiu, Q.-R., Chen, H., Shi, W.-J., Xu, J.-J., & Zhu, J. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1498 · Cited by 2
“…2025) improves learning efficiency by arranging training in an easy-to-hard sequence; subsequent work further introduced uncertainty-based active sample selection (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017; Kirsch et al., 2019), prioritizing the learning of samples with the highest information gain.”
Liu, A., Gong, Z., Song, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, X., Lu, H., Zhang, K., Wei, C., & Wang, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.01345 · Cited by 3
“While BOED has long been a staple in active learning for data selection (MacKay, 1992; Houlsby et al., 2011), its application to the inference process of foundation models is nascent.”
Huang, Y., Zeng, W., Kumaresan, A., & Wang, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.23099 · Cited by 1
A Bayesian Information-Theoretic Approach to Data Attribution
Tailor, D., Felicioni, N., & Ciosek, K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03858 · Cited by 2
“…influence-function estimator versus our information loss criterion. sition rule in Bayesian experimental design and active learning (MacKay, 1992; Houlsby et al., 2011), information-theoretic analyses of generalization via mutual information (Xu and Raginsky, 2017; Steinke and Zakynthinou,…”
Not Just How Much, But Where: Decomposing Epistemic Uncertainty into Per-Class Contributions
Toure, M. D., & Stephens, D. A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.21160 · Cited by 2
“Houlsby et al. [2011] introduce Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD), originally for Gaussian processes and binary classifiers, selecting data points that maximise the mutual information I ( y ; ω | x ) between labels and model parameters; this objective was subsequently adopted as the…”
WiCompass: Oracle-driven Data Scaling for mmWave Human Pose Estimation
Liang, B., Gong, C., Wang, H.-B., Liu, Q.-R., Zhou, R., Shao, F.-Z., Wang, Y.-B., Gao, W., Zhou, K.-C., Cui, G.-L., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.18726 · Cited by 2
Variance-Gated Ensembles: An Epistemic-Aware Framework for Uncertainty Estimation
Gillis, M., Xu, I., & Trappenberg, T. (2026) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.08142 · Cited by 2
“Using the variance-gated distribution q , the total (predictive) uncertainty is measured by Following standard ensemble decomposition (Houlsby et al., 2011), we define the gated aleatoric and epistemic components as To compare our variance-gated decomposition, we computed the corresponding standard…”
InfluentialRarity-Aware Stratified Active Learning for Class-Imbalanced Industrial Object Detection
Benhafid, Z., & Selouani, S. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16031236 · Cited by 2
“To better capture epistemic uncertainty, Bayesian approximations such as Monte Carlo dropout, deep ensembles, and Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) have been proposed [29–31].”
HALO-GPT:Hindi Active Learning with Oracle GPT-3.5
Maurya, A., Saradhi, V. V., & Anand, A. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation (FIRE) · doi:10.1145/3777867.3777878
“The pool-based AL paradigm commonly employs strategies grounded in uncertainty [14, 18, 26], diversity [19, 47], or a combination of both through hybrid objectives [2, 11, 33, 55].”
Uncertainty Quantification and Data Efficiency in AI: An Information-Theoretic Perspective
Simeone, O., & Romano, Y. (2026) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory · doi:10.1109/jsait.2026.3705302 · Cited by 2
“This epistemic uncertainty measure, given by the mutual information (5) between parameters and data, plays a central role in Bayesian active learning , where it is used to select the most informative data points for labeling [27].”
Decoupled Entropy Minimization
Ma, J., Li, H.-L., & Xiang, X. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03256 · Cited by 2
“On this basis, EM is widely used in active learning (reducing the number of possible hypotheses as rapidly as possible) [6; 15], domain adaptation (aligning the target data distribution with the source data distribution) [7; 27; 28], and online learning (connecting entropy to error and shift) [5;…”
Uncertainty Quantification for Regression: A Unified Framework based on kernel scores
Bulte, C., Sale, Y., Kutyniok, G., & Hüllermeier, E. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25599 · Cited by 2
“While the most commonly used measures are based on the Shannon entropy (Houlsby et al., 2011), those have been criticized for having undesirable properties (Wimmer et al., 2023 Uncertainty quantification in regression.”
Zero-Shot Performance Prediction for Probabilistic Scaling Laws
Schram, V., Hiller, M., Beck, D., & Cohn, T. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.16743 · Cited by 2
“AL strategies query either single data points [108] or batch data points [109].”
Multidimensional Uncertainty Quantification via Optimal TransportPreprint
Kotelevskii, N., Goloburda, M., Kondratyev, V., Fishkov, A., Guizani, M., Moulines, É., & Panov, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.22380 · Cited by 2
“The core assumption is that, for a Bayesian model or predictor ensemble, OOD inputs exhibit significant prediction disagreement, reflecting high EU (Kotelevskii et al., 2025b; Schweighofer et al., 2023; Houlsby et al., 2011; Hofman et al., 2024; Schweighofer et al., 2025).”
Human-Interpretable Uncertainty Explanations for Point Cloud Registration
Gaus, J. A., Schneider, L., Shi, Y.-T., Lee, J., Rayyes, R., & Triebel, R. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra57385.2026.11696014 · Cited by 2
“To decide which points to annotate, we use the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) criterion [25].”
InfluentialUncertainty Estimation using Variance-Gated Distributions
Gillis, M., Xu, I., & Trappenberg, T. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.08846 · Cited by 2
“It is the standard formulation used by Houlsby et al. [11], Gal and Ghahramani [1], Lakshminarayanan et al. [2] and Schweighofer et al. [4].”
OFAL: An Oracle-Free Active Learning Framework
Khorsand, H., & Pourahmadi, V. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.08126 · Cited by 2
“…with dataset D , the amount of information we would gain about the model parameters is given by: (3) Equation (3) called Bayesian Active Learning by Disagree-ment (BALD) [5] and shows that if the model is already familiar with input x , it will gain little information by obtaining the label.”
Unequal Uncertainty: Rethinking Algorithmic Interventions for Mitigating Discrimination from AIPreprint
Sargeant, H., Jorgensen, M., Shah, A., Goring, S., Weller, A., & Bhatt, U. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07872 · Cited by 5
“…particularly crucial in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and criminal justice, where the consequences of errors are severe and where legal and ethical considerations demand human oversight (Ali, Lahoti, and Gummadi 2021; Kostick-Quenet and Gerke 2022; Lykouris and Weng 2024; Guo et al. 2024).”
PICore: Physics-Informed Unsupervised Coreset Selection for Data Efficient Neural Operator Training
Satheesh, A., Khandelwal, A., Ding, M., & Balan, R. V. (2025) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.17151 · Cited by 2
“…are cluster based methods for active learning to find representative and typical examples (Sener & Savarese, 2017; Hacohen et al., 2022) and uncertainty based methods that find data for which the model is either uncertain or degraded (Rahmati et al., 2024; Houlsby et al., 2011; Ash et al., 2019).”
On Efficient Bayesian Exploration in Model-Based Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Caron, A., Mavroudis, V., & Hicks, C. (2025) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.02639 · Cited by 2
“…intrinsic rewards, rooted in Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) (Lindley, 1956; Pukelsheim, 2006; Foster et al., 2019; Rainforth et al., 2024) and Bayesian Active Learning (BAL) (Houlsby et al., 2011; Hanneke et al., 2014; Gal et al., 2017) principles, have been previously proposed.”
Interactive Multi-Objective Probabilistic Preference Learning with Soft and Hard Bounds
Chen, E., Truong, S. T., Dullerud, N., Koyejo, O., & Guestrin, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.21887 · Cited by 2
“Additional related works may be found in Appendix G .”
Abdeljaber, L., Alatrush, N., Alsarra, S., Billah, M., Alshammari, A. S., & Khan, L. R. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi64645.2025.00033
“• BALD Sampling : Bayesian Active Learning by Dis-agreement (BALD) [37] estimates the mutual information between model predictions and its parameters to measure uncertainty.”
Bayesian Neural Scaling Law Extrapolation with Prior-Data Fitted NetworksPreprint
Lee, D., Lee, D. B., Adriænsen, S., Lee, J., Hwang, S. J., Hutter, F., Kim, S. J., & Lee, H. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23032 · Cited by 2
“We frame this as a Bayesian active learning (BAL; Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017) problem—incrementally observing the unseen point that is expected to maximize the average likelihood on all the other unseen points, based on the uncertainty information provided by the given model.”
Ma, S., Du, H.-H., An, Y., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Wu, H., Lawlor, A., & Dong, R. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.11588 · Cited by 2
“Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) (Houlsby et al., 2011) treats DL model parameters as probabilistic.”
Debiased Active Learning with Variational Gradient Rectifier
Chen, W.-G., Wang, C.-J., Li, S.-J., Xu, K.-L., Bai, Y.-R., Chen, W., & Li, S.-S. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i15.33744 · Cited by 2
“For OOD generalization tasks, we employ the same datasets as in (Deng et al. 2023): SA (Kaushik, Hovy, and Lipton 2020), NLI (Kaushik, Hovy, and Lipton 2020), and ANLI (Houlsby et al. 2011).”
Li, H.-S., Xu, Y.-C., Chen, J., & Ding, K.-M. (2025) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2025.3619793 · Cited by 2
“Here, we apply a spatial sampling approach based on Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [24].”
Token-Level Uncertainty-Aware Objective for Language Model Post-Training
Liu, T.-K., Benjamin, A. S., & Zador, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16511 · Cited by 2
“Uncertainty is classified into aleatoric (data/irreducible) and epistemic (model/reducible) types, which can be separately estimated either via uncertainty estimation heads Nix and Weigend [1994], Kendall and Gal [2017] or Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement Houlsby et al. [2011].”
InfluentialMixed Likelihood Variational Gaussian Processes
Wu, K., Sanders, C., Letham, B., & Guan, P. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.04138 · Cited by 2
“The difference of GPs, f ( x 1 ) − f ( x 2 ) , is itself a GP, hence it is common to directly learn the difference as a GP with a special preference kernel (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
Dynamic-budget superpixel active learning for semantic segmentation
Wang, Y.-M., & Stavness, I. (2025) · Frontiers Artif. Intell. · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1498956 · Cited by 2
TSceneJAL: Joint Active Learning of Traffic Scenes for 3D Object Detection
Lei, C., Peng, W.-Y., Zhou, G., Zhang, M.-Y., Hao, Q., Ji, C., & Xu, C.-Z. (2024) · IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems (Print) · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3553170 · Cited by 2
“Let P denote the data in D S 3 and the method for seeking data point P is by [39]: where y is the prediction of data input P , and D l is the labeled data for model training.”
C'adiz-Leyton, M., Cabrera-Vives, G., Protopapas, P., Moreno-Cartagena, D., & Donoso-Oliva, C. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.01363 · Cited by 2
“• Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement ( BALD ; Houlsby et al. 2011): where p c and p ct are the mean and individual class probabilities, respectively.”
BackgroundScale-Aware Recognition in Satellite Images under Resource Constraint
Revankar, S., Phoo, C. P., Mall, U., Hariharan, B., & Bala, K. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00210 · Cited by 2
“This could be done by selecting examples that the model is most uncertain about [20, 36, 50], examples that are most representative of the unlabeled data [2, 35], or a combination of both [49].”
Hierarchical evidence aggregation in two dimensions for active water surface object detection
Zhong, W., Hu, H., Wang, Y., Li, L., Han, T., Li, C., & Zan, P. (2024) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-024-03685-9 · Cited by 1
“Before EDL, BALD [47] is proposed to estimate epistemic uncertainty through Bayesian network.”
Differentially Private Active Learning: Balancing Effective Data Selection and Privacy
Schwethelm, K., Kaiser, J., Kuntzer, J., Yiğitsoy, M., Rückert, D., & Kaissis, G. A. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml64287.2025.00053 · Cited by 1
“IV demonstrate that step amplification introduces only a small runtime increase to DP-AL of a few minutes across all experimental settings.”
Batch Active Learning in Gaussian Process Regression using Derivatives
Yu, S. A., Zimmer, C., & Nguyen-Tuong, D. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.01861 · Cited by 2
“In the context of BAL in GPs, Houlsby et al. [20] applied Bayesian Active Learning on GP classification problem where they defined an acquisition function which estimates the quantity of mutual information between the model predictions and the model parameters.”
BackgroundSchröder, C., & Heyer, G. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09206 · Cited by 2
“Aggre-gated scores are then obtained using the BALD measure (Houlsby et al., 2011), based on which instances are sampled in a class-balanced manner.”
MethodTowards Integrating Personal Knowledge into Test-Time Predictions
Lage, I., Parbhoo, S., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.08636 · Cited by 2
“While this is not guaranteed to provide an optimal solution, it is often employed for similar approaches, e.g. [ Houlsby et al. , 2011 ] , and is generally considered effective.”
Cakir, C., Bogoclu, C., Emmerling, F., Streli, C., GuilhermeBuzanich, A., & Radtke, M. (2024) · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad4253 · Cited by 2
“BO incorporates a prior probability distribution over the objective function that can be updated as new data are collected [39].”
BackgroundEvaluation and Improvement of Fault Detection for Large Language Models
Hu, Q., Wen, J., Cordy, M., Huang, Y.-H., Ma, W., Xie, X.-F., & Ma, L. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.14419 · Cited by 2
“We introduce another fault detection method baseline which is based on dropout uncertainty, Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [16].”
MethodUncertainty-Aware Explanations Through Probabilistic Self-Explainable Neural NetworksPreprint
Vadillo, J., Santana, R., Lozano, J. A., & Kwiatkowska, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.13740 · Cited by 2
“To measure epistemic uncertainty only, the mutual information between the output y and the parameters R can be employed [11, 13, 19, 20], which, in our case, can be formalized as: represents a measure of aleatoric uncertainty.”
MethodBayesian Active Learning for Censored Regression
Hüttel, F. B., Riis, C., Rodrigues, F., & Pereira, F. C. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11973 · Cited by 2
“A common method to estimate the information is with the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) acquisition function [Houlsby et al., 2011], which estimates the mutual information between the model parameters and the labels to identify which labels to acquire.”
MethodActive Learning Method Based on Pseudo-labeling
Hou, X., & Wang, C. (2024) · International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation · doi:10.1109/icrca60878.2024.10649264 · Cited by 2
“MIAOD [5] proposed a reweighting method to distribute the weight of unlabeled instances, so as to achieve a balanced relationship between instance-level features and image-level features, eliminate the disadvantage of local information masking global information caused by the previous method, and…”
MethodTransferable Candidate Proposal with Bounded Uncertainty
Go, K., & Kim, K.-H. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04604 · Cited by 2
One-Bit Supervision for Image Classification: Problem, Solution, and Beyond
Hu, H., Xie, L., Huo, X., Hong, R., & Tian, Q. C. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3633779 · Cited by 11
“BALD [23] chose data points that are expected to maximize the mutual information between predictions and model posterior.”
BackgroundXAL: EXplainable Active Learning Makes Classifiers Better Low-resource Learners
Luo, Y., Yang, Z., Meng, F.-D., Li, Y., Guo, F., Qi, Q.-L., Zhou, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05502 · Cited by 2
“Most previous AL methods rely on model predictive uncertainty or disagreement for unlabeled data, and the most uncertain data are believed to be the most informative and worthful ones to be annotated (Lewis, 1995; Houlsby et al., 2011; Margatina et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022a).”
Learning Objective-Specific Active Learning Strategies with Attentive Neural Processes
Bakker, T., van Hoof, H., & Welling, M. (2023) · ECML/PKDD · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.05477 · Cited by 2
Towards Workflows for the Use of AI Foundation Models in Visual Inspection Applications
Rigotti, M., Antognini, D., Assaf, R., Bakirci, K., Frick, T., Giurgiu, I., Janoušková, K., Janicki, F. M., Jubran, H., Malossi, C., et al. (2023) · ce/papers · doi:10.1002/cepa.2141
“dataset (see Figure 4), we show a minority class recall improvement of 32% and an overall accuracy gain of 14% compared to the best-performing traditional AL method (BALD [36]).”
MethodCost-Efficient Online Decision Making: A Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Approach
Rahbar, A., Åkerblom, N., & Chehreghani, M. H. (2023) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.10699 · Cited by 2
Moses, A., Bogart, C., O'Haire, K., Solorzano, L., & Yeo, E. (2023) · Defense + Commercial Sensing · doi:10.1117/12.2663179 · Cited by 2
“23,27,31,32,36 We can write it as the Entropy of the average softmax vector minus the average of the Entropy of the individual softmax vectors: For object detection tasks in images or point clouds, object classification probability is not the only consideration in selecting samples to label in…”
BackgroundMulti-Symmetry Ensembles: Improving Diversity and Generalization via Opposing Symmetries
Loh, C., Han, S.-J., Sudalairaj, S., Dangovski, R., Xu, K., Wenzel, F., Soljačić, M., & Srivastava, A. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.02484 · Cited by 2
“We use the commonly used uncertainty measure BALD in the active learning framework (Gal et al., 2017; Houlsby et al., 2011), which is de-fined the information gained of the model parameters; see Appendix G.1 for a definition.”
MethodTargeted active learning for probabilistic models
Tosh, C., Tec, M., & Tansey, W. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.12122 · Cited by 2
“We use the BALD formulation of EIG (Houlsby et al., 2011) which chooses queries based on maximizing the mutual information between the outcome and the latent parameter θ: I(y; θ|x, πn) = Hπn(x)− Eθ∼πn [ Hθ(x)] ] ,”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialActive Learning for Individual Data via Minimal Stochastic Complexity
Shayovitz, S., & Feder, M. (2022) · Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing · doi:10.1109/allerton49937.2022.9929357 · Cited by 2
“In this section we use the mathematical model of [13] which is repeated here for clarity.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdaptive and Efficient Qubit Allocation Using Reinforcement Learning in Quantum Networks
Gao, Y.-N., Yang, S., Li, F., & Fu, X.-H. (2022) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.001.2200157 · Cited by 2
“Here, we introduce kind of AL algorithm based on uncertainty theory to assist the training process of RL, called Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD [14] AL algorithm.”
MethodExcess risk analysis for epistemic uncertainty with application to variational inference
Futami, F., Iwata, T., Ueda, N., Sato, I., & Sugiyama, M. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.01606 · Cited by 2
“…integrated with deep learning methods, it is used in such applications as dataset shift (Ovadia et al., 2019), adversarial data detection (Ye & Zhu, 2018), active learning (Houlsby et al., 2011), Bayesian optimization (Hernández-Lobato et al., 2014), and reinforcement learning (Janz et al., 2019).”
Depth Uncertainty Networks for Active Learning
Murray, C., Allingham, J., Antorán, J., & Hernández-Lobato, J. M. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.06796 · Cited by 2
Krylov, D., Poliakov, S., Khanzhina, N., Zabashta, A., Filchenkov, A. A., & Farseev, A. (2021) · MULL @ ACM Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3476098.3485055 · Cited by 4
“This paper considers QBC based on the BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) method [23].”
Methodda Silva, R. D., Zhong, B.-X., Chen, Y., & Lobaton, E. J. (2021) · Inf. · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.16779301 · Cited by 2
“Mutual information (MI) between the posterior over the weights and the prediction y∗ quantifies the uncertainty in the BNN’s output [50].”
BackgroundRobust Contrastive Active Learning with Feature-guided Query Strategies
Krishnan, R., Ahuja, N. A., Sinha, A., Subedar, M., Tickoo, O., & Iyer, R. (2021) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06873 · Cited by 2
“• BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017): Choose a set of samples from an unlabeled pool that yields higher model uncertainty.”
BackgroundActive Learning in CNNs via Expected Improvement MaximizationPreprint
Nagpal, U. G., & Knowles, D. A. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.14015 · Cited by 2
“, 2017), BALD/Batchbald (Houlsby et al., 2011; Kirsch et al., 2019), and core-set AL via robust k-Center (Sener & Savarese, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialSemi-supervised Learning of Galaxy Morphology using Equivariant Transformer Variational Autoencoders
Nishikawa-Toomey, M., Smith, L., & Gal, Y. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.08714 · Cited by 2
“Prior research conducted on the data set [2] uses active learning [3] to select the most informative galaxies for classification by volunteers, showing improvements in the accuracy of the classification task using this technique.”
MethodSequential Likelihood-Free Inference with Neural Proposal
Kim, D., Song, K., Kim, Y.-Y., Shin, Y., Kang, W.-M., Moon, I.-C., & Joo, W. (2020) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2023.03.021 · Cited by 2
“Similarly, we test the active learning with BALD [20] activation function.”
MethodLoss Rescaling by Uncertainty Inference For Single-Stage Object Detection
Li, Y., Chen, X., Li, Q., & Zhang, N. (2020) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip40778.2020.9190845 · Cited by 2
Effective Version Space Reduction for Convolutional Neural NetworksPreprint
Liu, J., Chiotellis, I., Triebel, R., & Cremers, D. (2020) · ECML/PKDD · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.12456 · Cited by 2
“Many active learning methods for neural networks rely on measures of the “informativeness” of a query, in the form of classifier uncertainty, margin [19,11] or information gain [18,13,21].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBucher, B., Schmeckpeper, K., Matni, N., & Daniilidis, K. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.06082 · Cited by 2
“Several approaches to active learning have been proposed, including sampling the most uncertain data points [40, 63, 57, 34, 71, 25], sampling where an ensemble of models disagrees [59, 14, 42, 26, 31, 47], sampling data that will cause the largest expected information gain [29], sampling data that will cause the larg…”
Chen, W., Salay, R., Sedwards, S., Abdelzad, V., & Czarnecki, K. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294260 · Cited by 2
“The querying methods compared are random, entropy [38], max-softmax [21], margin [35], ODIN [29], BALD [22], and vote entropy [8].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCost-Effective Active Learning with Informativeness and Representativeness for Semantic Segmentation
Du, Z.-B., Tan, Y., & Yang, L. (2019) · International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design · doi:10.1109/iscid.2019.00016 · Cited by 2
“For the informativeness criterion we mainly consider the uncertainty sampling, including Max Entropy [15], BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) [7] and Least Confident [11].”
MethodSuper-resolution of Time-series Labels for Bootstrapped Event DetectionPreprint
Kiskin, I., Meepegama, U., & Roberts, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.00254 · Cited by 2
“As the listener is presented randomly sampled (or actively sampled (Houlsby et al., 2011; Naghshvar et al., 2012)) sections of audio data, a section much shorter than 5 seconds would make the task of tuning into each new example very difficult due to the absence of a reference signal.”
BackgroundBayes-Optimal Entropy Pursuit for Active Choice-Based Preference Learning
Pallone, S., Frazier, P., & Henderson, S. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.07694 · Cited by 2
“Most similar to our methodology, Brochu et al. (2010) and Houlsby et al. (2011) model a user’s utility function using a Gaussian process, updating the corresponding prior after each user response, and adaptively choose questions by minimizing an estimate of posterior entropy.”
BackgroundMethodVashishtha, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.27570 · Cited by 1
“Epistemic uncertainty is quantified information-theoretically using BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), which measures the mutual information between the model output y and the model parameters θ conditioned on the dataset D : Intuitively, BALD isolates the information that learning the true model parameters θ would provide…”
InfluentialFrom Valid to Useful: Post-Verification Acquisition for Recursive Self-Improving Recommendation
Hasan, T., Foust, T., Tang, S., Neves, L., Gupta, A., Udagawa, H., Dias, H., Silva, D., & Ramanath, R. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.04302 · Cited by 1
“BALD measures the mutual information between predictions and model parameters at a given context [11].”
EMPIRIC: Experiment-Driven Learning of Residual World Models for Robot Planning
Liang, Y.-C., Li, A., Nguyen, D., Bunnapradist, E., Naim, M., Kodali, S., Merler, M., Li, B.-W., Gopinathan, K., Liu, Y.-Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.35047 · Cited by 1
“The quantity estimates the mutual information between the parameters and the noisy predicate reading, where H is the binary entropy (Houlsby et al., 2011); because ϕ j is a fixed function of the observation, this information lower-bounds the information in the full observation.”
Different Corruptions, Different Signals: Uncertainty and Loss in Federated Data Quality
Scott, B., Luo, Z., & Ho, E. S. L. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.31454 · Cited by 1
“EE is exactly the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) acquisition score [20]; here it is used purely as an epistemic-uncertainty measure and no active learning is performed.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlsby, N., Huszár, F., Ghahramani, Z., & Lengyel, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- arXiv
- 1112.5745
- OpenAlex
- W1872312298
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- Bayesian active learning, information gain, predictive entropy, Gaussian process classifier, preference learning, classification, nonparametric models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review