The DOI matches its DataCite record; 14 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Active Learning for Classification and Preference Learning
Open accessAbstract
Information theoretic active learning has been widely studied for probabilistic models. For simple regression an optimal myopic policy is easily tractable. However, for other tasks and with more complex models, such as classification with nonparametric models, the optimal solution is harder to compute. Current approaches make approximations to achieve tractability. We propose an approach that expresses information gain in terms of predictive entropies, and apply this method to the Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC). Our approach makes minimal approximations to the full information theoretic objective. Our experimental performance compares favourably to many popular active learning algorithms, and has equal or lower computational complexity. We compare well to decision theoretic approaches also, which are privy to more information and require much more computational time. Secondly, by developing further a reformulation of binary preference learning to a classification problem, we extend our algorithm to Gaussian Process preference learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also used to guide methods that require exploration like active learning [53], continual learning [92], Bayesian optimisation [47], and reinforcement learning [58].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The epistemic term I x is BALD's acquisition score [Houlsby et al., 2011]”
From Decomposing LLM-Judge Uncertainty to Target Expert Labels (2026) · cites this paper as Houlsby et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Seung, H., Opper, M., & Sompolinsky, H. (1992) · Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130417 · Cited by 2,193 · cited 2×
“Perhaps the most ubiquitous is active learning for SVMs [Tong and Koller, 2001, Seung et al., 1992], where the volume of Version Space (VS) is used as a proxy for the posterior entropy.”
BackgroundMethodNear-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes
Guestrin, C., Krause, A., & Singh, A. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102385 · Cited by 1,906 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
On a measure of the information provided by an experiment
Lindley, D. V. (1956) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 2×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundMethodInformation-based objective functions for active data selection
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 2×
“We no longer need to build our entropy calculation around the type of posterior approximation (as in [MacKay, 1992, Krishnapuram et al., , Lawrence et al., 2003]) but are free to choose from many of the available algorithms.”
BackgroundMethodExpected Information as Expected Utility
Bernardo, J. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344689 · Cited by 705 · cited 1×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundPreference learning with Gaussian processes
Chu, W., & Ghahramani, Z. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102369 · Cited by 504 · cited 4×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationNear-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost
Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Gupta, A., & Kleinberg, J. (2006) · 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1127777.1127782 · Cited by 489 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
BackgroundPairwise Preference Learning and Ranking
Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (2003) · European Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39857-8_15 · Cited by 295 · cited 1×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
MethodMaximum entropy sampling and optimal bayesian experimental design
Sebastiani, P., & Wynn, H. P. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00225 · Cited by 243 · cited 1×
“Information Theoretic approaches: Maximum Entropy Sampling (MES) [Sebastiani and Wynn, 2000] explicitly works in dataspace (Eqn.”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 981
Data-efficient Active Learning for Structured Prediction with Partial Annotation and Self-Training
Zhang, Z., Strubell, E., & Hovy, E. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.12634 · Cited by 5
“B) (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-play
Liu, J., Dvijotham, K., Lee, J., Yuan, Q., Strobel, M., Lakshminarayanan, B., & Ramachandran, D. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.05807 · Cited by 5
“Finally, Houlsby et al. (2011) has proposed a information-theoretic policy Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD), which measures the mutual information between data points and model parameters and is adopted in the deep uncertainty literature (Gal et al., 2017; Kirsch et al., 2019;…”
Trust Your ∇: Gradient-based Intervention Targeting for Causal Discovery
Olko, M., Zając, M., Nowak, A., Scherrer, N., Annadani, Y., Bauer, S., Kucinski, L., & Milos, P. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.13715 · Cited by 5
“MI is approximated in different ways: AIT [Scherrer et al., 2021] uses F-score inspired metric to implicitly approximate MI; CBED [Tigas et al., 2022] incorporates BALD-like estimator [Houlsby et al., 2011]; ABCD [Agrawal et al., 2019] uses estimator based on weighted importance sampling.”
MethodDRE: density-based data selection with entropy for adversarial-robust deep learning models
Guo, Y., Hu, Q., Cordy, M., Papadakis, M., & Traon, Y. L. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07812-2 · Cited by 5
“MCP, Core-set, BALD, and (occasionally) DFAL are the best performing metrics and outperform random sampling.”
BackgroundInfluentialPareto Optimization for Active Learning under Out-of-Distribution Data Scenarios
Zhan, X.-Y., Dai, Z., Wang, Q.-Z., Li, Q., Xiong, H., Dou, D., & Chan, A. B. (2022) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.01190 · Cited by 5
“[23] Neil Houlsby, Ferenc Huszár, Zoubin Ghahramani, and Máté Lengyel.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialActive Learning for the Subgraph Matching Problem
Ge, Y., & Bertozzi, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671760 · Cited by 5
“Most active learning acquisition functions for statistical belong to one of a few categories: uncertainty [42], [21], [14], margin [47], [2], [22], clustering [13], [28], and look-ahead [56], [5].”
BackgroundAddressing Bias in Active Learning with Depth Uncertainty Networks... or Not
Murray, C., Allingham, J., Antorán, J., & Hernández-Lobato, J. M. (2021) · ICBINB@NeurIPS · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.06926 · Cited by 5
Robust Active Learning: Sample-Efficient Training of Robust Deep Learning Models
Guo, Y., Hu, Q., Cordy, M., Papadakis, M., & le Traon, Y. (2021) · 2022 IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) · doi:10.1145/3522664.3528614 · Cited by 5
“The characteristics of the others are not applicable due to the use of dropouts (BALD, DropOut-Entropy) and model independence (MCP, DFAL, EGL, Core-set).”
BackgroundInfluentialBayesian Active Meta-Learning for Black-Box Optimization
Nikoloska, I., & Simeone, O. (2021) · International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/spawc51304.2022.9833993 · Cited by 5
“We note that, the conditional entropy term in (6) is distinct from the standard aleatoric uncertainty in conventional learning in which the model parameter φ τ , and not the hyperparameter θ , is assumed to be unknown [9].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAutomated Seed Quality Testing System using GAN & Active LearningPreprint
Nagar, S., Pani, P., Nair, R., & Varma, G. (2021) · Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.00777 · Cited by 5
Factor Screening using Bayesian Active Learning and Gaussian Process Meta-Modelling
Li, C., Rana, S., Gill, A., Nguyen, D., Gupta, S., & Venkatesh, S. (2021) · International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412770 · Cited by 5
“Using decision and information theory are two general methods for active learning [9].”
MethodDeep Active Learning Through Cognitive Information Parcels
Zhao, W., Kong, Y., Ding, Z., & Fu, Y. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3123266.3123337 · Cited by 5
“It has the be er results than the variation ratios, predictive entropy, and Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) methods [10, 12, 19], which select samples based on uncertainty information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAnchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examples
Vivek, R., Ethayarajh, K., Yang, D., & Kiela, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.eacl-long.95 · Cited by 4
Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examples
Vivek, R., Ethayarajh, K., Yang, D., & Kiela, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.08638 · Cited by 4
Preference-Aware Bayesian Optimization for Interactive Decision Making
Ma, Y., Wang, L.-D., Cui, W.-J., Zhou, Y.-C., & Du, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2025.3633283 · Cited by 4
“Formally, at each iteration t , we identify the maximally informative preference pair through information-theoretic criteria proposed by Houlsby et al. [47] I r ; w ˇˇ y , y 2 , D t = H (cid:2) r ˇˇ y , y 2 , D t (cid”
The Alignment Auditor: A Bayesian Framework for Verifying and Refining LLM ObjectivesPreprint
Bou, M., Patel, N., Jagota, A., Krishna, S., & Parbhoo, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.06096 · Cited by 1
“…inference over rewards, (ii) tracking sequential posterior contraction to demonstrate epistemic uncertainty reduction, in the spirit of Bayesian active learning (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017), and (iii) verifying inferred objectives through policy-level utility in RLHF fine-tuning.”
Open-CRB: Toward Open World Active Learning for 3D Object Detection
Chen, Z., Luo, Y., Wang, Z.-X., Wang, Z.-J., & Huang, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3575756 · Cited by 4
“The hybrid works [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48] combine both paradigms such as by measuring uncertainty as to the gradient magnitude [44] at the final layer of neural networks and selecting gradients that span a diverse set of directions.”
Towards Open-Ended Discovery for Low-Resource NLP
Dossou, B. F. P., & Aïdasso, H. (2025) · Workshop on Uncertainty-Aware NLP (UncertaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.uncertainlp-main.24 · Cited by 2
“In conventional NLP, model uncertainty is often used for tasks like active learning or confidence calibration (Kendall and Gal; Gal and Ghahramani, 2016; Houlsby et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2017).”
MAIP: A Multi-Attribute Informativeness Proxy for Image Semantic Broadcasting Communication
Zhang, Z., Xiao, S., Lan, G., Xi, M., Wen, J., & Yang, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2025.3573144 · Cited by 4
“The existing AL methods mainly evaluate the informativeness of samples either from uncertainty [22], [23], [24] or from diversity [25], [26], [27], [28].”
Ho, A., Zanisi, L., de Leeuw, B., Galvan, V., Rodriguez-Fernandez, P., & Howard, N. T. (2025) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/5.0276455 · Cited by 2
“…to obtain this information elsewhere include: • comparing the candidate pool directly to existing training set distributions [42]; • extracting local output gradients with respect to the input variables from the trained NN [43]; • extracting uncertainty estimates from the trained NN [44, 45].”
Yang, H.-C., Dong, X., & Wu, J.-L. (2025) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114469 · Cited by 4
“Formally, when the expectation is taken with respect to the prior predictive distribution of the data, this expected KL divergence coincides with the mutual information between the parameters and the observations [33, 38, 39].”
Towards Self-Supervised Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression
Shukla, M., Shameem, A., Salzmann, M., & Alahi, A. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.10587 · Cited by 4
“This attribute has made it widely applicable in fields like active learning (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017), uncertainty estimation (Gal & Ghahramani, 2016; Kendall & Gal, 2017; Lakshminarayanan et al., 2017; Russell & Reale, 2021), image reconstruction (Dorta et al., 2018), human pose…”
Waite, J. R., Hasan, M. Z., Liu, Q., Jiang, Z., Hegde, C., & Sarkar, S. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS) · doi:10.1145/3716550.3722033 · Cited by 2
“One popular approach is uncertainty sampling, which prioritizes data points where the model exhibits the highest uncertainty [9, 14, 18, 37].”
Wang, Y.-L., Shi, V., Hsu, W.-C., Dai, Y.-W., Yao, S., Zhong, Z.-S., Zhang, Z.-S., Wu, J., Maxwell, A., Collins, S., et al. (2024) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adfc20 · Cited by 4
“Lastly, Random refers to a random sampling process designed to mimic real-world randomness. proof-of-concept RL agent that, while performing below radiologists’ levels, demonstrates potential to reduce decision-making and establish prompt stop criteria for more efficient SAM-assisted segmentation…”
InfluentialLi, J., Li, R., Qi, J., Lai, S.-N., Lv, L.-P., Fan, K.-J., Tang, J.-H., Yue, Y.-T., Zhou, D.-Z., Liu, Y.-H., et al. (2024) · ACM Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3746027.3755023 · Cited by 4
Santosh, T. Y. S. S., Chowdhury, I., Xu, S., & Grabmair, M. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.18645 · Cited by 4
“We employ 4 variants (SR, SMP, PV, BALD in Sec.”
MethodInfluentialUnderstanding Uncertainty-based Active Learning Under Model Mismatch
Rahmati, A., Fan, M., Zhou, R., Urban, N. M., Yoon, B.-J., & Qian, X.-N. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.13690 · Cited by 4
“Variance-based or information-theoretic methods (estimated by entropy or mutual information), such as Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [22], are considered under this category.”
MethodDCoM: Active Learning for All Learners
Mishal, I., & Weinshall, D. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01804 · Cited by 4
“We validate DCoM through an extensive empirical study using various vision datasets (Section 4), demonstrating that DCoM consistently achieves superior performance across all budget ranges.”
Strategic data navigation: information value-based sample selection
Balogh, C. L., Pelenczei, B., Kővári, B., & Bécsi, T. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10813-3 · Cited by 4
“The BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) algorithm, used by Houlsby et al. (2011) and later (Kirsch et al. 2019), enhances active learning by selecting data points that maximize the mutual information between the model’s predictions and its parameters by identifying samples where the…”
Semi-supervised active learning using convolutional auto- encoder and contrastive learning
Roda, H., & Geva, A. (2024) · Frontiers Artif. Intell. · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1398844 · Cited by 4
“Additionally, LADA (Kim Moreover, approaches like the Core-Set Approach (Sener and Savarese, 2017) and Bayesian Active Learning (BALD) (Houlsby et al., 2011) offer strategies for selecting informative instances, with Core-Set identifying a compact, diverse subset of unlabeled data, and BALD…”
MethodInfluentialKundačina, O., Vincan, V., & Mišković, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3565216 · Cited by 4
“A higher variability in these outputs for unlabeled data samples indicates greater uncertainty, suggesting the prioritiza-tionofsamplesforlabeling[36].”
Shishkin, S., Hollosi, D., Goetze, S., & Doclo, S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10446970 · Cited by 4
“Bayesian AL [8,9] is a subset of AL where the model trained is Bayesian.”
MethodHübotter, J., Sukhija, B., Treven, L., As, Y., & Krause, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15441 · Cited by 4
“Shoham & Avron (2023) recently analyzed experimental designs for global one-shot learning in overparameterized models.”
BackgroundExperiment Design with Gaussian Process Regression with Applications to Chance-Constrained Control
Anderson, S., Byl, K., & Hespanha, J. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control · doi:10.1109/cdc49753.2023.10383292 · Cited by 4
“Overall then, our approach differs from previous work in mainly two aspects: first, the experiment design criteria differs from information theoretic approaches by using the expected control performance in order to focus learning in control-relevant regions, and second, our approach to solving the…”
Sun, H., Chan, A. J., Seedat, N., Huyuk, A., & van der Schaar, M. (2023) · J. Data-centric Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.14110 · Cited by 4
“DataCOPE deals with a fundamentally different task from active learning (Lewis, 1995; Sebastiani and Wynn, 2000; Mussmann and Liang, 2018; Houlsby et al., 2011; Kirsch et al., 2019; Nguyen et al., 2022).”
BackgroundLearning to Rank for Active Learning via Multi-Task Bilevel Optimization
Ding, Z., Chen, S., Jia, R., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.17044 · Cited by 4
“Popular approaches rely on sequentially picking one data point per round [Houlsby et al., 2011, Gal et al., 2017] though the addition of a single data point causes minimal change to validation accuracy while increasing the cost of model retraining.”
Beam Search Optimized Batch Bayesian Active Learning
Sun, J., Zhai, H., Saisho, O., & Takeuchi, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25751 · Cited by 4
“Within these heuristics, Bayesian Active Learning by Dis-agreement (BALD) (Houlsby et al. 2011) performs extraor-dinarily well by using the mutual information between the model prediction and the model parameters to estimate sam-ples’ acquisition scores.”
BackgroundMethodActive Cost-aware Labeling of Streaming Data
Cai, T.-J., & Kandasamy, K. (2023) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06808 · Cited by 4
“In this flavor, there are several works specifically focused on applications such as large-scale classification, preference learning and posterior approximation (Pinsler et al., 2019; Houlsby et al., 2011; Kandasamy et al., 2017b).”
BackgroundSloman, S. J., Cavagnaro, D. R., & Broomell, S. B. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02410-7 · Cited by 4
“If high response variability stems mainly from dispersion across values of the focus, this indicates that each value of the focus makes distinct predictions, facilitating identification of the correct value (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundScalable Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning
Rubashevskii, A., Kotova, D. A., & Panov, M. (2023) · SDM · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.05490 · Cited by 4
“The original BALD criterion [13] is formulated as the conditional mutual information I(θ, y | x,Dtrain) between unknown (unobserved) output y and latent parameters θ, conditioned on input variable x and observed data Dtrain.”
BackgroundExploring Structure-Wise Uncertainty for 3D Medical Image Segmentation
Vasiliuk, A., Frolova, D., Belyaev, M., & Shirokikh, B. (2022) · MICAD · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.00303 · Cited by 4
“The first is Mutual Information (MI) or BALD [7]: UMI = − ∑C c=1 P̄ c log P̄ c+ 1T ∑T t=1 ∑C c=1 P c t logP c t .”
Active Learning for Imbalanced Civil Infrastructure Data
Frick, T., Antognini, D., Rigotti, M., Giurgiu, I., Grewe, B., & Malossi, C. (2022) · ECCV Workshops · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10586 · Cited by 4
“CIFAR-10 Next, we evaluate absolute model performance on CIFAR-10 [21], comparing traditional AL methods (BALD [17], Entropy [32]) with our novel Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning Virtual Exemplars for Label-Efficient Satellite Image Change Detection
Sahbi, H., & Deschamps, S. (2022) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium · doi:10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9883936 · Cited by 4
Kirsch, A., Kossen, J., & Gal, Y. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.08766 · Cited by 4
“Many active learning approaches, especially the ones that are not transductive, maximize the expected information gain, also called BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), as an acquisition function—or, equivalently, minimize the model uncertainty.”
BackgroundScalable Batch-Mode Deep Bayesian Active Learning via Equivalence Class Annealing
Zhang, R., Khan, A. A., Grossman, R., & Chen, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.13737 · Cited by 4
“Recent works, including both Bayesian (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017; Kirsch et al., 2019) and non-Bayesian approaches (Sener & Savarese, 2017; Ash et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning AlgorithmsPreprint
Ha, H., Gupta, S., Rana, S., & Venkatesh, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.04999 · Cited by 3
“Our proposed acquisition function is defined as the mutual information (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017) between Q̃k(x) and the BNN parameters ω, i.”
InfluentialAutomated and Autonomous Experiment in Electron and Scanning Probe MicroscopyPreprint
Kalinin, S. V., Ziatdinov, M., Hinkle, J. D., Jesse, S., Ghosh, A., Kelley, K. P., Lupini, A., Sumpter, B., & Vasudevan, R. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.12165 · Cited by 4
“In particular, flexible Bayesian methods are useful for indicating disagreement in the posterior distribution, which can be settled through external information like human labels.(98)”
MethodLADA: Look-Ahead Data Acquisition via Augmentation for Active LearningPreprint
Kim, Y.-Y., Song, K., Jang, J., & Moon, I.-C. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.04194 · Cited by 4
“The recent acquisition function calculates the hypothetical disagreement by f θ on a data instance, Houlsby et al. 2011).”
MethodKim, S., Mai, T., Khanh, T. N., Han, S., Park, S., Singh, K., & Cha, M. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14282 · Cited by 4
“Others have proposed collecting as much information as possible by prioritizing inspection of uncertain samples [22], [23], [24].”
BackgroundModel-Centric and Data-Centric Aspects of Active Learning for Neural Network Models
Bossér, J., Sörstadius, E., & Chehreghani, M. H. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.10835 · Cited by 4
“The method in [12] applies predictive entropy to the Gaussian Process Classifier to develop a Bayesian approach for active learning called BALD.”
MethodDeep Active Learning by Model InterpretabilityPreprint
Liu, Q., Liu, Z., Zhu, X., Xiu, Y.-L., & Zhu, J. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.12100 · Cited by 4
“Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) (Houlsby et al. 2011; Gal, Islam, and Ghahramani 2017; Siddhant and Lipton 2018) measures uncertainty according to the probabilistic distribution of model outputs via Bayesian inference (Zhu et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVariational Learning of Bayesian Neural Networks via Bayesian Dark Knowledge
Shen, G., Chen, X., & Deng, Z. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/282 · Cited by 7
“…uncertainty is re-quiredIn fact, there are some uncertainty metrics which explicitly need the epistemic uncertainty, such as predictive variance for regression [Gal and Ghahramani, 2016b] and Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement objective (BALD) [Houlsby et al. , 2011] for classification.”
BackgroundNguyen, K., & Daum'e, H. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07777 · Cited by 4
“We highlight challenges in applying traditional uncertainty-based approaches [9, 11] to this problem, showing that different types of the agent uncertainty become misleading signals for making query decisions.”
Dropout Strikes Back: Improved Uncertainty Estimation via Diversity Sampled Implicit Ensembles
Tsymbalov, E., Fedyanin, K., & Panov, M. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.03274 · Cited by 4
“We take BALD [20] as an uncertainty estimate.”
MethodBALD-VAE: Generative Active Learning based on the Uncertainties of Both Labeled and Unlabeled Data
Lee, S.-K., & Kim, J.-H. (2019) · International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications · doi:10.1109/ritapp.2019.8932813 · Cited by 4
“Selecting unlabeled data follows the flow of original uncertainty pool-based active learning with Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) [20], and highly uncertain”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMedical Image Analysis with Semantic Segmentation and Active Learning
Saidu, C. I., & Csató, L. (2019) · Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Informatica · doi:10.24193/subbi.2019.1.03 · Cited by 3
“(2) BALD (Bayesian Active Learning By Disagreement) looks for the superpixel x that maximizes the decrease in conditional entropy caused by the posterior [9, 16]: x∗ = arg max x∈Du H[y|x,Du]− Ep(ω|Du)H[y|x,Du]”
BackgroundEfficient Adaptive Data Acquisition via Pretrained Belief Representations
Huang, D., Huang, Z., Hassan, C., Acerbi, L., Kaski, S., & Rainforth, T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.25197 · Cited by 3
“…explicitly based on defining uncertainty measures, which is typically taken to be entropy to yield the expected information gain [43, 53], though they can vary in what variables are targeted for learning, e.g., in AL, we can either take w to be model parameters [29] or downstream predictions [62].”
Uncertainty Estimation in Neural Network-enabled Side-channel Analysis and Links to Explainability
Nouraniboosjin, S., & Ganji, F. (2026) · IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive · doi:10.46586/tches.v2026.i2.764-807 · Cited by 3
Loss-Driven Bayesian Active Learning
Huang, Z., Bickford-Smith, F., & Rainforth, T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.11995 · Cited by 3
“Bayesian active learning (Bickford Smith et al, 2023, 2024; Gal et al, 2017; Houlsby et al, 2011; Kirsch et al, 2019; MacKay, 1992a,b) is the application of BED to sequentially selecting data to use in training a predictive model for outputs, ˜ y ∈ Y given inputs ˜ x ∈ X .”
Select, Label, Evaluate: Active Testing in NLP
Purificato, A., Bucarelli, M. S., Bacciu, A., Silvestri, F., & Mantrach, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.1160 · Cited by 3
“This principle underlies acquisition functions such as BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011) and Batch-BALD (Kirsch et al., 2019).”
FaithFusion: Harmonizing Reconstruction and Generation via Pixel-wise Information Gain
Wang, Y., Li, X.-F., Huang, C., Zhang, W.-H., Li, H., Wang, B., Sun, X., & Wang, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21113 · Cited by 3
“The corresponding Expected Information Gain, defined as EIG ( Ω ; ) , is the difference between the prior entropy of Ω and the expected posterior entropy after observing Y NV S i [19]: where ) .”
Deep Ensembles for Epistemic Uncertainty: A Frequentist Perspective
Jain, A., & Bates, S. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.22063 · Cited by 3
“On the other hand, high epistemic uncertainty signals that collecting more training data in this region is likely to improve the model, which makes it suitable for guiding model development and active learning (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017; Smith et al., 2023).”
InfluentialCausal-EPIG: A Prediction-Oriented Active Learning Framework for CATE Estimation
Gao, E., Fawkes, J., & Sejdinovic, D. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.21866 · Cited by 3
“This objective is indirect; reducing global parameter uncertainty does not guarantee a targeted reduction in CATE uncertainty (Houlsby et al., 2011; Jesson et al., 2021).”
BioBO: Biology-informed Bayesian Optimization for Perturbation Design
Li, Y., Cui, T.-Y., Mansi, T., Prakash, M., & Liao, R. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19988 · Cited by 3
“Active learning uses the information gain of the probabilistic surrogate model to guide the selection, such as BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011) and EPIG (Smith et al., 2023); therefore, it is an exploration-only process.”
Monte Carlo Tree Diffusion with Multiple Experts for Protein Design
Liu, X.-F., Cao, M.-X., Jiang, S.-H., Luo, X., Duan, X.-T., Wang, M.-D., Sosnick, T., Xu, J.-B., & Stevens, R. L. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.15796 · Cited by 3
“Their difference equals the mutual information (BALD score [7]), or Jensen–Shannon–style divergence between experts.”
Interpretable Reward Modeling with Active Concept Bottlenecks
Laguna, S., Kobalczyk, K., Vogt, J. E., & van der Schaar, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.04695 · Cited by 3
“…Gain (EIG) EIG maximizes the expected reduction in uncertainty about the model’s predictions after observing a concept label, which can be approximated by computing the difference between the expected entropy and the entropy of the expected prediction after sampling (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
Kheirandish, M., Zhang, S., Catanzaro, D., & Crudu, V. (2025) · IISE Transactions · doi:10.1080/24725854.2025.2516495 · Cited by 3
“This technique was initially introduced for the Gaussian Process Classifier (Houlsby et al., 2011) and later adopted by other researchers (e.g., Gal, 2016; Gawlikowski et al., 2023).”
Efficient structure learning of gene regulatory networks with Bayesian active learning
Sándor, D., & Antal, P. (2025) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-025-06149-6 · Cited by 3
“The Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) approach, proposed by Houlsby et al. [35], was later adapted for causal inference by Jes-son et al. [36].”
SAHDA: A Semantic-Aware Hybrid Approach for Arabic Spell Checking with Domain Adaptation
Ibrahim, M., Gervás, P., & Méndez, G. (2025) · 2025 12th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT) · doi:10.1109/icit64950.2025.11049091 · Cited by 3
“Stage 3: Human Refinement implements Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [16] to prioritize ambiguous cases (e.g., neologisms like (cid:2037)(cid:1996)ﺍ(cid:1960)(cid:1617) , ”tires”) for expert review.”
Vendi Information Gain: An Alternative To Mutual Information For Science And Machine Learning
Nguyen, Q., & Dieng, A. B. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.09007 · Cited by 3
“IG-based approaches are to be contrasted against a popular learning policy called “Bayesian active learning by disagreement”, or BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), which minimizes uncertainty in the model’s parameters and may lead to suboptimal decisions in various scenarios (Smith et al., 2023).”
Towards Regulatory-Confirmed Adaptive Clinical Trials: Machine Learning Opportunities and Solutions
Klein, O. N., Hüyük, A., Shamir, R., Shalit, U., & van der Schaar, M. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.09226 · Cited by 3
Bayesian Computation in Deep Learning
Chen, W., Li, B.-L., Zhang, R., & Li, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.18300 · Cited by 3
“This concept of “epistemic uncertainty reduction” is particularly useful in data acquisition tasks following Bayesian principles (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
Distributionally Robust Active Learning for Gaussian Process Regression
Takeno, S., Okura, Y., Inatsu, Y., Aoyama, T., Tanaka, T., Akahane, S., Hanada, H., Hashimoto, N., Murayama, T., Lee, H.-J., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.16870 · Cited by 3
“The AL algorithms for classification problems are heavily discussed compared with the regression problem [for example, Houlsby et al., 2011, Zhao et al., 2021, Bickford Smith et al., 2023].”
Xiang, Y., Fan, L., Yin, C., Kong, M., & Ji, C. (2025) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3746252.3760793 · Cited by 3
“To capture the uncertainty in the model, a common measure is the conditional differential entropy (CDE): After we get the uncertainty of the distribution, the epistemic uncertainty can be expressed as described by [15]: where 𝐼 (·) refers to the mutual information and 𝜃 is the parameters of…”
Robust Reward Alignment via Hypothesis Space Batch Cutting
Xie, Z.-X., Zhang, H., Feng, Y., & Jin, W. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.02921 · Cited by 3
“Active learning based on Bayesian approaches has been extensively studied (Daniel et al., 2014; Biyik & Sadigh, 2018; Sadigh et al., 2017; Bıyık et al., 2024; Houlsby et al., 2011; Biyik et al., 2024), and many of these methods can be interpreted through the lens of hypothesis space removal.”
Philps, B., Hernández, M. D. C. V., Qin, C., Clancy, Ú., Sakka, E., Maniega, S. M., Bastin, M. E., Jochems, A. C. C., Wardlaw, J. M., & Bernabéu, M. O. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103697 · Cited by 2
“However, disentangling epistemic from aleatoric uncertainty is a non-trivial task, as the conventional decomposition (Houlsby et al., 2011) of Shannon entropy (total uncertainty) into mutual information (epistemic uncertainty) and conditional entropy (aleatoric uncertainty) can yield inconsistent…”
Preferential Normalizing Flows
Mikkola, P., Acerbi, L., & Klami, A. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.08710 · Cited by 3
“We stress that candidates x are here not samples from the belief density but are instead provided by some other unknown process, such as an active learning method [Houlsby et al., 2011].”
Generalizing to any diverse distribution: uniformity, gentle finetuning and rebalancing
Loukas, A., Martinkus, K., Wagstaff, E., & Cho, K. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.05980 · Cited by 3
“Additionally, methods like mutual information between predictions and model posterior have been used to target data points that most influence the model’s posterior distribution [56].”
MethodSTONE: A Submodular Optimization Framework for Active 3D Object Detection
Mao, R., Maharana, S. K., Iyer, R. K., & Guo, Y. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.03918 · Cited by 3
“Hybrid sampling strategies are proposed recently [24, 1, 25, 20], combining representative/diversity and uncertainty sampling, like BADGE [1], where the authors propose to use the gradient magnitude with respect to the classifier’s parameters as a measure of uncertainty.”
BackgroundActive Learning to Guide Labeling Efforts for Question Difficulty Estimation
Thuy, A., Loginova, E., & Benoit, D. F. (2024) · PKDD/ECML Workshops · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.09258 · Cited by 3
“To address this issue, acquisition functions designed explicitly for batch acquisition with NN classifiers have been developed, such as BatchBALD Kirsch et al. (2019).”
MethodInfluentialBayesian Self-Training for Semi-Supervised 3D Segmentation
Unal, O., Sakaridis, C., & Gool, L. V. (2024) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.08102 · Cited by 3
“Inspired by uncertainty estimation techniques commonly employed in active learning (AL) pipelines [21,46], we introduce a Bayesian self-training strategy that leverages an uncertainty-aware filtering technique for generating more reliable pseudo-labels.”
BackgroundMethodIs merging worth it? Securely evaluating the information gain for causal dataset acquisition
Fawkes, J., Ter-Minassian, L., Ivanova, D. R., Shalit, U., & Holmes, C. C. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.07215 · Cited by 3
“In the CausalBALD (Jesson et al., 2021) approach, the acquisition function is altered to specifically target areas where the distributions of different treatment groups overlap, thereby maximizing sample efficiency for learning personalised treatment effects.”
InfluentialPolicy-Based Bayesian Active Causal Discovery with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Gao, H., Sun, Z., Yang, H., & Chen, X. (2024) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671705 · Cited by 3
How Useful is Intermittent, Asynchronous Expert Feedback for Bayesian Optimization?
Kristiadi, A., Strieth-Kalthoff, F., Subramanian, S. G., Fortuin, V., Poupart, P., & Pleiss, G. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06459 · Cited by 3
“At each BO iteration t , with probability p fb , we add three expert feedback { ( x i 0 , x i 1 , ℓ i ) } 3 i =1 , where each of the pair ( x i 0 , x i 1 ) is proposed by either random selection or the BALD active learning algorithm (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
MethodSAVA: Scalable Learning-Agnostic Data Valuation
Kessler, S., Le, T., & Nguyen, V. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.01130 · Cited by 3
“Unlabeled samples can be valued by using the prediction disagreement from a probabilistic model (Houlsby et al., 2011), this disagreement can also be obtained from multiple models (Freund et al., 1997).”
BackgroundAmortized Inference for Efficient Grasp Model Adaptation
Noseworthy, M., Shaw, S., Kessens, C. C., & Roy, N. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610789 · Cited by 3
“…selected which maximize the information gain at a single timestep (a greedy, but often good, approximation to optimizing over sequences of actions [4]): (2) One way to solve this maximization is via a simple pool-based approach: first generate a collection of M unlabeled samples, then score each…”
MethodA View on Out-of-Distribution Identification from a Statistical Testing Theory Perspective
Caron, A., Hicks, C., & Mavroudis, V. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.03052 · Cited by 3
WaSSaBi: Wafer Selection With Self-Supervised Representations and Brain-Inspired Active Learning
Pandaram, K., Genssler, P., & Amrouch, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems Part 1: Regular Papers · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2024.3357975 · Cited by 3
“The Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) [36] heuristic relates to the mutual information between the probabilities of the predictions.”
BackgroundKölle, M., Walter, V., & Sörgel, U. (2024) · PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science · doi:10.1007/s41064-024-00281-3 · Cited by 6
“This disagreement is typically assessed by vote entropy (Argamon-Engelson and Dagan 1999), Kullback-Leibler divergence (McCallum and Nigam 1998), or mutual information between model predictions and model parameters, as employed in context of Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) (Houlsby et al. 2011).”
Comparison of parallel SMC and MCMC for Bayesian deep learning
Liang, X., Lukens, J., Lohani, S., Kirby, B. T., Searles, T., Qiu, X., & Law, K. J. H. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.06173 · Cited by 3
Contrast response function estimation with nonparametric Bayesian active learning
Marticorena, D., Wong, Q. W., Browning, J., Wilbur, K., Jayakumar, S., Davey, P., Seitz, A. R., Gardner, J. R., & Barbour, D. (2024) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.24.1.6 · Cited by 3
“In this specific acquisition function, the differential entropy serves as a proxy for information gain, meaning that it aims to select the next sample point x * that would maximize the information about the underlying latent function (Houlsby, Huszár, Ghahramani, & Lengyel, 2011).”
BackgroundManivannan, S. (2023) · Signal, Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1007/s11760-023-02915-2 · Cited by 3
“Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) [8] calculates mutual information between a model’s predictions and its parameters to identify top candidates for labeling based on high overall uncertainty and prediction disagreement.”
Batch Mode Deep Active Learning for Regression on Graph Data
Samoaa, P., Aronsson, L., Leitner, P., & Chehreghani, M. H. (2023) · BigData Congress [Services Society] · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386685 · Cited by 3
“It is shown in [11] that this is equivalent to BALD [12] in a regression setting.”
MethodModel Uncertainty based Active Learning on Tabular Data using Boosted Trees
Shankaranarayana, S. M. (2023) · International Conference on AI-ML-Systems · doi:10.1145/3639856.3639877 · Cited by 3
“Since the entropy does not represent model uncertainty, a Bayesian method for deep active learning was proposed in DBAL [14], which combined Bayesian convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [12, 13] with Bayesian active learning [18].”
MethodTrajectory-Based Active Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Learning from Demonstration
Kweon, S., Hwang, H., & Park, F. C. (2023) · International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems · doi:10.23919/iccas59377.2023.10316798 · Cited by 3
Preference-Based Multi-Objective Optimization with Gaussian Process
Huang, T., & Li, K. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc53992.2023.10394212 · Cited by 3
“In 2011, [24] uses GP classification in the form of information theory to find the best solution with the biggest entropy.”
MethodActive Learning for Multilingual Fingerspelling Corpora
Wang, S., & Nalisnick, E. T. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.12443 · Cited by 3
“In preliminary experiments, we studied the following: maximum entropy (Shannon, 1948), BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), variation ratios (Freeman, 1965), and mean standard deviation.”
MethodPoster: Continual Network Learning
Cicco, N. D., Sadi, A. A., Grasselli, C., Melis, A., Antichi, G., & Tornatore, M. (2023) · Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication · doi:10.1145/3603269.3610855 · Cited by 3
“Vote count in our baseline CRF is a decent query strategy, but information-theoretic quantities [4, 12] are among the state-of-the-art.”
BackgroundALReg: Registration of 3D Point Clouds Using Active Learning
Şahin, Y. H., Karabacak, O., Kandemir, M., & Ünal, G. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13137422 · Cited by 2
“BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) [63], using an information-theoretic approach, in addition to uncertainty, measures a selected sample’s impact on the network’s uncertainty.”
MethodCross-lingual German Biomedical Information Extraction: from Zero-shot to Human-in-the-LoopPreprint
Liang, S., Hartmann, M., & Sonntag, D. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.09908 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlsby, N., Huszár, F., Ghahramani, Z., & Lengyel, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- arXiv
- 1112.5745
- OpenAlex
- W1872312298
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- Bayesian active learning, information gain, predictive entropy, Gaussian process classifier, preference learning, classification, nonparametric models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review