The DOI matches its DataCite record; 14 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Active Learning for Classification and Preference Learning
Open accessAbstract
Information theoretic active learning has been widely studied for probabilistic models. For simple regression an optimal myopic policy is easily tractable. However, for other tasks and with more complex models, such as classification with nonparametric models, the optimal solution is harder to compute. Current approaches make approximations to achieve tractability. We propose an approach that expresses information gain in terms of predictive entropies, and apply this method to the Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC). Our approach makes minimal approximations to the full information theoretic objective. Our experimental performance compares favourably to many popular active learning algorithms, and has equal or lower computational complexity. We compare well to decision theoretic approaches also, which are privy to more information and require much more computational time. Secondly, by developing further a reformulation of binary preference learning to a classification problem, we extend our algorithm to Gaussian Process preference learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also used to guide methods that require exploration like active learning [53], continual learning [92], Bayesian optimisation [47], and reinforcement learning [58].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The epistemic term I x is BALD's acquisition score [Houlsby et al., 2011]”
From Decomposing LLM-Judge Uncertainty to Target Expert Labels (2026) · cites this paper as Houlsby et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Seung, H., Opper, M., & Sompolinsky, H. (1992) · Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130417 · Cited by 2,193 · cited 2×
“Perhaps the most ubiquitous is active learning for SVMs [Tong and Koller, 2001, Seung et al., 1992], where the volume of Version Space (VS) is used as a proxy for the posterior entropy.”
BackgroundMethodNear-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes
Guestrin, C., Krause, A., & Singh, A. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102385 · Cited by 1,906 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
On a measure of the information provided by an experiment
Lindley, D. V. (1956) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 2×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundMethodInformation-based objective functions for active data selection
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 2×
“We no longer need to build our entropy calculation around the type of posterior approximation (as in [MacKay, 1992, Krishnapuram et al., , Lawrence et al., 2003]) but are free to choose from many of the available algorithms.”
BackgroundMethodExpected Information as Expected Utility
Bernardo, J. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344689 · Cited by 705 · cited 1×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundPreference learning with Gaussian processes
Chu, W., & Ghahramani, Z. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102369 · Cited by 504 · cited 4×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationNear-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost
Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Gupta, A., & Kleinberg, J. (2006) · 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1127777.1127782 · Cited by 489 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
BackgroundPairwise Preference Learning and Ranking
Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (2003) · European Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39857-8_15 · Cited by 295 · cited 1×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
MethodMaximum entropy sampling and optimal bayesian experimental design
Sebastiani, P., & Wynn, H. P. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00225 · Cited by 243 · cited 1×
“Information Theoretic approaches: Maximum Entropy Sampling (MES) [Sebastiani and Wynn, 2000] explicitly works in dataspace (Eqn.”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111
A Survey of Deep Active Learning
Ren, P., Xiao, Y., Chang, X., Huang, P.-Y., Li, Z., Gupta, B. B., Chen, X., & Wang, X. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3472291 · Cited by 1,169
“For its part, BatchBALD [84] opts to expand BALD [67] to the batch query context; this approach no longer calculates the mutual information between a single sample and model parameters, but rather recalculates the mutual information between the batch samples and the model parameters to jointly score the batch of sampl…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDeep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Data
Gal, Y., Islam, R., & Ghahramani, Z. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.02910 · Cited by 900
Self-citationBatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active LearningPreprint
Kirsch, A., van Amersfoort, J. R., & Gal, Y. (2019) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08158 · Cited by 826
The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification
Beluch, W. H., Genewein, T., Nurnberger, A., & Kohler, J. M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00976 · Cited by 655
“Another measure (also known as (BALD, [27]) is the mutual information between data-points and weights.”
BackgroundSelection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep LearningPreprint
Coleman, C., Yeh, C., Mussmann, S., Mirzasoleiman, B., Bailis, P. D., Liang, P., Leskovec, J., & Zaharia, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.11829 · Cited by 261
Self-Supervised Exploration via DisagreementPreprint
Pathak, D., Gandhi, D., & Gupta, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.04161 · Cited by 190
“Common selection criteria include entropy (Dagan & Engelson, 1995), uncertainty sampling (Lewis & Gale, 1994) and expected informativeness (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundActive Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance SamplesPreprint
Chang, H.-S., Miller, E. G., & McCallum, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.07433 · Cited by 271
“Notice that there are other methods that can measure the prediction uncertainty, such as the mutual information between labels and parameters [19], but we found that the prediction variance works better in our experiments.”
MethodModern Bayesian Experimental Design
Rainforth, T., Foster, A., Ivanova, D. R., & Bickford-Smith, F. (2023) · Statistical Science · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.14545 · Cited by 263
“Perhaps the most obvious related literature is that of Bayesian active learning (BAL) [37, 45, 56, 65, 77, 78, 91].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHaut, J. M., Paoletti, M. E., Plaza, J., Li, J., & Plaza, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2838665 · Cited by 294
Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examples
Margatina, K., Vernikos, G., Barrault, L., & Αλέτρας, Ν. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.51 · Cited by 211
“Houlsby et al. (2011) propose Bayesian Active Learning by Disagree-ment (BALD), a method that chooses data points that maximize the mutual information between predictions and model’s posterior probabilities.”
MethodSiddhant, A., & Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1318 · Cited by 182
“We denote Monte Carlo Dropout Disagreement by DO-BALD and its Bayes-by-Backprop counterpart as BB-BALD.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvidential Deep Learning for Open Set Action Recognition
Bao, W., Yu, Q., & Kong, Y. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01310 · Cited by 185
“For the MC Dropout and BNN SVI which incorporate stochastic sampling in testing, we set the 10 forward passes through the model and adopt the BALD [20] method to quantify the model uncertainty as suggested by [27].”
MethodBatch Active Learning at ScalePreprint
Citovsky, G., DeSalvo, G., Gentile, C., Karydas, L., Rajagopalan, A., Rostamizadeh, A., & Kumar, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.14263 · Cited by 82
“The authors propose a simple idea to turn the original BALD algorithm of Houlsby et al. [2011] into a batch active learning algorithm via a softmax function over the current uncertainties”
MethodUncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Bhatt, U., Antorán, J., Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., Sattigeri, P., Fogliato, R., Melançon, G., Krishnan, R., Stanley, J., Tickoo, O., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462571 · Cited by 300
“It is also used to guide methods that require explorations such as active learning [78], continual learning [134], Bayesian optimisation [70], and reinforcement learning [82].”
MethodImproving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimizationPreprint
Krishnan, R., & Tickoo, O. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07923 · Cited by 93
“Various metrics have been proposed to quantify these uncertainties in classification tasks [32, 35], including predictive entropy [36], variation ratio [37] and mutual information [36, 38].”
BackgroundLikelihood-free inference with emulator networksPreprint
Lueckmann, J.-M., Bassetto, G., Karaletsos, T., & Macke, J. (2018) · Symposium on Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.09294 · Cited by 193
Task-Aware Variational Adversarial Active Learning
Kim, K., Park, D., Kim, K. I., & Chun, S. Y. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00807 · Cited by 157
Wimmer, L., Sale, Y., Hofman, P., Bischl, B., & Hüllermeier, E. (2022) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.03302 · Cited by 185
“One approach that is now commonly adopted [Houlsby et al., 2011, Gal, 2016, Depeweg et al., 2018, Smith and Gal, 2018, Mobiny et al., 2021] is based on information-theoretic quantities derived from Shannon entropy.”
MethodEDDI: Efficient Dynamic Discovery of High-Value Information with Partial VAEPreprint
Ma, C., Tschiatschek, S., Palla, K., Hernández-Lobato, J. M., Nowozin, S., & Zhang, C. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.11142 · Cited by 99
“We briefly discuss connection of EDDI information reward with BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011) and.”
BackgroundPreferential Bayesian Optimization
González, J. I., Dai, Z.-W., Damianou, A. C., & Lawrence, N. D. (2017) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.03651 · Cited by 169
“Note that this has some interesting connections with uncertain sampling as presented in (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSequential Graph Convolutional Network for Active LearningPreprint
Caramalau, R., Bhattarai, B., & Kim, T.-K. (2020) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.10219 · Cited by 166
“Hence, it is successfully integrated into active learning by [10, 16, 19, 28].”
BackgroundLearning Algorithms for Active LearningPreprint
Bachman, P., Sordoni, A., & Trischler, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.00088 · Cited by 120
“Houlsby et al. (2011) presented an approach based on Bayesian information theory, in which examples are selected in order to maximally reduce the entropy of the posterior distribution over classifier parameters.”
BackgroundMethodGalaxy Zoo: probabilistic morphology through Bayesian CNNs and active learning
Walmsley, M., Smith, L., Lintott, C., Gal, Y., Bamford, S., Dickinson, H., Fortson, L., Kruk, S., Masters, K., Scarlata, C., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2816 · Cited by 160
“We do this by combining the general acquisition strategy BALD (MacKay 1992; Houlsby et al. 2011) with our probabilistic model and Monte-Carlo Dropout (Gal 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesian Generative Active Deep LearningPreprint
Tran, T. B., Do, T.-T., Reid, I. D., & Carneiro, G. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.11643 · Cited by 98
“The main technical contribution of this paper consists of combining BALD and BDA for generating new labeled samples that are informative for the training process (see Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesian Batch Active Learning as Sparse Subset ApproximationPreprint
Pinsler, R., Gordon, J., Nalisnick, E. T., & Hernández-Lobato, J. M. (2019) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.02144 · Cited by 156
“Similarly, we obtain For this model, BALD [2, 4] can also be evaluated in closed form: We can make a direct comparison with BALD by treating the squared norm of a data point with itself as an acquisition function, α ACS ( x n ; D 0 ) = (cid:104)L n , L n (cid:105) ˆ π, F , yielding, Viewing α ACS…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotators
Zhang, R., Li, Y., Ma, Y., Zhou, M., & Zou, L. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.19596 · Cited by 156
“…which aims to select the most beneficial samples from an unlabeled data pool based on criteria including uncertainty (Lewis and Gale, 1994; Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017), diversity (Huang et al., 2010; Sener and Savarese, 2018), and hybrid objectives (Du et al., 2017; Yang et…”
BackgroundActive preference-based Gaussian process regression for reward learning and optimization
Biyik, E., Huynh, N., Kochenderfer, M. J., & Sadigh, D. (2020) · Robotics: Science and Systems Conference · doi:10.1177/02783649231208729 · Cited by 154
“Houlsby et al. (2011) and Daniel et al. (2015) proposed active GP regression methods for classification and reward learning, respectively.”
MethodAsking Easy Questions: A User-Friendly Approach to Active Reward LearningPreprint
Biyik, E., Palan, M., Landolfi, N. C., Losey, D. P., & Sadigh, D. (2019) · Conference on Robot Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.04365 · Cited by 151
A comprehensive survey on deep active learning in medical image analysis
Wang, H., Jin, Q., Li, S., Liu, S., Wang, M., & Song, Z. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103201 · Cited by 157
“They were the first to use MC dropout in computing uncertainty metrics like entropy, standard deviation, and Bayesian active learning disagreement (BALD) (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
MethodInfluentialActive Learning for Deep Detection Neural Networks
Aghdam, H. H., Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Lopez, A., & Weijer, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00377 · Cited by 148
Bui, T. D., Yan, J., & Turner, R. E. (2016) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.17863/cam.20846 · Cited by 148
“…classification (Rasmussen and Williams, 2005), representation learning (Lawrence, 2005), state space modelling (Wang et al., 2005), active learning (Houlsby et al., 2011), reinforcement learning (Deisenroth, 2010), black-box optimisation (Snoek et al., 2012), and numerical methods (Mahsereci and…”
BackgroundA Comparative Survey of Deep Active LearningPreprint
Zhan, X.-Y., Wang, Q.-Z., Huang, K.-H., Xiong, H., Dou, D., & Chan, A. B. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.13450 · Cited by 146
“Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreements ( BALD ) [20, 26] chooses data points that are expected to maximize the information gained from the model parameters ω , i.e. the mutual information between predictions and model posterior: [29] maximizes the mean standard deviation of the predicted…”
BackgroundTheoretical perspectives on active sensing
Yang, S. C., Wolpert, D. M., & Lengyel, M. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.009 · Cited by 119
“[71]), which does not require fictitious posterior updates:”
Self-citationEliciting Human Preferences with Language ModelsPreprint
Li, B. Z., Tamkin, A., Goodman, N. D., & Andreas, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.11589 · Cited by 135
“Active learning has traditionally focused on pool-based methods, which choose points to label from a fixed reservoir (Lewis & Catlett, 1994; Settles & Craven, 2008; Settles, 2009; Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundReinforced active learning for image segmentationPreprint
Casanova, A., Pinheiro, P. O., Rostamzadeh, N., & Pal, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.06583 · Cited by 110
“…to label at each step out of all possible regions in the pool, (ii) H is an uncertainty sampling method that selects the regions with maximum cumulative pixel-wise Shannon entropy, (iii) B picks regions with maximum cumulative pixel-wise BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011b; Gal et al., 2017) metric.”
InfluentialLocal Augmentation for Graph Neural NetworksPreprint
Liu, S., Ying, R., Dong, H., Li, L., Xu, T., Rong, Y., Zhao, P., Huang, J., & Wu, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03856 · Cited by 70
“We adopt the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) acquisition function [19] to sample the most important inferences with the approximation from the Monte Carlo (MC) dropout samples as”
MethodActive label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraints
Roschewitz, M., Castro, D. C., Tanno, R., Schwaighofer, A., Tezcan, K. C., Monteiro, M., Bannur, S., Lungren, M. P., Nori, A., Glocker, B., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28818-3 · Cited by 128
Efficient Uncertainty Estimation for Semantic Segmentation in VideosPreprint
Huang, P.-Y., Hsu, W.-T., Chiu, C.-Y., Wu, T., & Sun, M. (2018) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.11037 · Cited by 125
“BALD needs to aggregate”
InfluentialActive Testing: Sample-Efficient Model EvaluationPreprint
Kossen, J., Farquhar, S., Gal, Y., & Rainforth, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.05331 · Cited by 25
“Perhaps the best-known instance of adaptive experimental design is active learning, wherein the designs to be chosen are the data points for which to acquire labels (Atlas et al., 1990; Settles, 2010; Houlsby et al., 2011; Sener & Savarese, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRączkowska, A., Możejko, M., Zambonelli, J., & Szczurek, E. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50587-1 · Cited by 127
“47 ), in their application to histopathological image classification.”
A Survey of Active Learning for Text Classification using Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Schröder, C., & Niekler, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.07267 · Cited by 127
“QUERY STRATEGIES RANDOM DATA - BASED DATA UNCERTAINTY discriminative[34] REPRESENTATIVENESS CLUSTERING flat[101, 68] hierarchical[18,77] SET CONSTRUCTION core-set[84,78] MODEL - BASED MODEL UNCERTAINTY UNC-IE[87] EXPECTED PARAMETER CHANGE expected gradient length [86,104] expected weight change [96] ADVERSARIAL DFAL[22…”
BackgroundMena, J., Pujol, O., & Vitrià, J. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3477140 · Cited by 114
“In [42], Houlsby et al. state that test points x ∗ that maximize MI are points on which the model is uncertain on average, as the model parameters W erroneously produce predictions with a high degree of confidence.”
BackgroundLearning to Map for Active Semantic Goal NavigationPreprint
Georgakis, G., Bucher, B., Schmeckpeper, K., Singh, S., & Daniilidis, K. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.15648 · Cited by 114
“The variant Offline is our semantic map prediction model without fine-tuning with an active strategy, BALD adapts the BALD objective (Houlsby et al., 2011) for actively training our ensemble, and Entropy refers to our model fine-tuned with an entropy objective for active training (Shannon, 1948).”
MethodInfluentialActive sensing in the categorization of visual patterns
Yang, S., Lengyel, M., & Wolpert, D. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12215 · Cited by 112
“Using the insight that the BAS score formally expresses the mutual information between c and z% (for the given x%), Equation 6 can be rewritten in a different form that is computationally far more convenient, as it does not require expensive posterior updates for a continuum of imaginary data, z%, to compute IPðcjz%;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationUlmer, D., Hardmeier, C., & Frellsen, J. (2021) · IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03051 · Cited by 58
“Estimating model uncertainty through modelling the (approximate) posterior p ( θ | D ) in Bayesian model averaging is a popular technique (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2016; Smith & Gal, 2018; Ulmer et al., 2020), but comes with the disadvantage of additional computational overhead.”
MethodActive Learning Through a Covering Lens
Yehuda, O., Dekel, A., Hacohen, G., & Weinshall, D. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.11320 · Cited by 106
On Statistical Bias In Active Learning: How and When To Fix ItPreprint
Farquhar, S., Gal, Y., & Rainforth, T. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11665 · Cited by 106
“This is because the acquisition proposal distribution, a stochastic relaxation of the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) objective (Houlsby et al., 2011), is effective (c.f. § 4).”
InfluentialKaramcheti, S., Krishna, R., Fei-Fei, L., & Manning, C. D. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.564 · Cited by 62
“…by Disagreement) builds upon Monte-Carlo Dropout by proposing a decision theoretic objective; it acquires examples that maximise the decrease in expected posterior entropy (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017; Siddhant and Lipton, 2018) – capturing “disagreement” across different dropout masks.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialControversial stimuli: Pitting neural networks against each other as models of human cognition
Golan, T., Raju, P. C., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912334117 · Cited by 121
“Ideally, we would take an optimal experimental-design approach (21, 22) and estimate, for a given image, how much seeing the response would reduce our uncertainty about which model generated the data (assuming that one of the models underlies the observed human responses).”
MethodJiang, W., Lei, B., & Daniilidis, K. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.17874 · Cited by 38
“The aim is to select the next best view that maximizes the Information Gain [12, 15, 18] be-tween candidates views x ∈ D pool and D train , where D pool is the pool of candidate views: where H [ · ] is the entropy [14].”
BackgroundScaling Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Inference for Bayesian Neural Networks with Symmetric SplittingPreprint
Cobb, A. D., & Jalaian, B. A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.06772 · Cited by 43
“In the literature, the use of mutual information for uncertainty quantification can be seen in works by Houlsby et al. (2011); Gal, Islam, and Ghahramani (2017) Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) and via knowledge uncertainty in work by Depeweg et al. (2017); Malinin, Mlodozeniec, and Gales…”
BackgroundMethodLearning and Control Using Gaussian Processes
Jain, A., Nghiem, T. X., Morari, M., & Mangharam, R. (2018) · International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1109/iccps.2018.00022 · Cited by 94
“For further details, we refer the reader to [23].”
BackgroundA Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processing
Zhang, Z., Strubell, E., & Hovy, E. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10109 · Cited by 91
“Bayesian perspective over the model parameters is also applicable (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
BackgroundPrediction-Oriented Bayesian Active Learning
Smith, F. B., Kirsch, A., Farquhar, S., Gal, Y., Foster, A., & Rainforth, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.08151 · Cited by 10
“When y and y ∗ are discrete we can write This can be estimated using samples, θ i ∼ p φ ( θ ) (Houlsby, 2014): Relatedly Houlsby et al (2011) identified a closed-form approximation of BALD for the particular case of using a probit likelihood function, a Gaussian-process prior and a Gaussian…”
MethodInfluentialMisra, I., Girshick, R. B., Fergus, R., Hebert, M., Gupta, A., & van der Maaten, L. (2017) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.01238 · Cited by 89
“Common selection criteria include entropy [25], boosting the margin for classifiers [1, 12] and expected informativeness [20].”
BackgroundAlarab, I., & Prakoonwit, S. (2022) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-022-10904-8 · Cited by 104
“BayesianActiveLearningbyDisagreement (BALD) [20] is an acquisitionmethod that utilises the uncertainty estimates via mutual information between the model predictions and model parameters.”
MethodInfluentialEfficiently measuring a quantum device using machine learning
Lennon, D. T., Moon, H., Camenzind, L. C., Yu, L., Zumbühl, D. M., Briggs, G. A. D., Osborne, M. A., Laird, E. A., & Ares, N. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0193-4 · Cited by 89
“This criterion is equivalent both to minimising the expected information entropy of the posterior distribution and to Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) [5] (see Methods).”
BackgroundGhoshal, B., Tucker, A., Sanghera, B., & Wong, W. L. (2020) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/coin.12411 · Cited by 88
“We have analyzed two approaches to estimate uncertainty within classification: tractable view of the mutual information (MI) 30,32 and bias-corrected MI. 33 The MI between the prediction y and the posterior over the model parameters w captures a different measure of uncertainty.”
MethodIdentifying Causal-Effect Inference Failure with Uncertainty-Aware ModelsPreprint
Jesson, A., Mindermann, S., Shalit, U., & Gal, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.00163 · Cited by 41
“ω0 if the label y = Y 0 were observed for a new data point x, given the training dataset D [24].”
BackgroundLearning Human Objectives by Evaluating Hypothetical BehaviorPreprint
Reddy, S., Dragan, A., Levine, S., Legg, S., & Leike, J. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.05652 · Cited by 86
“We did not compare to other ensemble-based approximations, such as mutual information (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
ResultUncertainty-Aware Audiovisual Activity Recognition Using Deep Bayesian Variational Inference
Subedar, M., Krishnan, R., Meyer, P. L., Tickoo, O., & Huang, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00640 · Cited by 85
“We evaluate the epistemic uncertainty using Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) [21] for the activity recognition task.”
MethodLabel-Efficient Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review
Li, J.-J., Chen, D., Qi, X.-D., Li, Z., Huang, Y.-B., Morris, D., & Tan, X. (2023) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14691 · Cited by 83
“In Houlsby et al. (2011), Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) was proposed to select samples that maximize the mutual information between model parameters and model predictions.”
BackgroundRevisiting Superpixels for Active Learning in Semantic Segmentation with Realistic Annotation Costs
Cai, L.-L., Xu, X., Liew, J., & Foo, C. S. (2021) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01084 · Cited by 83
Benchmarks and Algorithms for Offline Preference-Based Reward Learning
Shin, D., Dragan, A., & Brown, D. S. (2023) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.01392 · Cited by 82
“We model our uncertainty using an approximate posterior p(θ | D), given by training an ensemble or dropout network on our offline dataset D. Houlsby et al. (2011) show that the information gain of a potential query can be formulated as: I(θ;Y | D) = H(Y | D)− Eθ∼p(θ|D)[H(Y | θ,D)].”
MethodCurated LLM: Synergy of LLMs and Data Curation for tabular augmentation in ultra low-data regimes
Seedat, N., Huynh, N., van Breugel, B., & van der Schaar, M. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.12112 · Cited by 79
“This selection is typically based on criteria such as uncertainty sampling which focuses on epistemic uncertainty (Mussmann & Liang, 2018; Houlsby et al., 2011; Kirsch et al., 2019; Nguyen et al., 2022).”
BackgroundQuestBench: Can LLMs ask the right question to acquire information in reasoning tasks?Preprint
Li, B. Z., Kim, B., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.22674 · Cited by 77
“…extensively explored strategies for sequential data acquisition in various domains, including concept learning [56, 3], active learning [16, 58, 36, 23, 55], Bayesian optimization [43, 44, 49, 5, 60, 35, 64, 24, 13, 21, 68, 22], reinforcement learning [39, 29, 61], and robot planning with…”
Diversify and Disambiguate: Learning From Underspecified Data
Lee, Y., Yao, H., & Finn, C. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.03418 · Cited by 77
“Our MIbased diversity term resembles a common active learning criterion (Houlsby et al., 2011), but a key difference is that we directly optimize a set of models with respect to our criterion.”
MethodNoise Contrastive Priors for Functional UncertaintyPreprint
Hafner, D., Tran, D., Lillicrap, T., Irpan, A., & Davidson, J. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.09289 · Cited by 104
“Other approaches use classifier confidence (Lewis and Gale, 1994), predicted expected error (Roy and McCallum, 2001), or model disagreement (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
MethodDueling Posterior Sampling for Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
Novoseller, E., Wei, Y., Sui, Y., Yue, Y., & Burdick, J. W. (2019) · CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.01289 · Cited by 19
“Other settings include: active learning (Sadigh et al., 2017; Houlsby et al., 2011; Eric et al., 2008), which is focused exclusively on learning an accurate model rather than maximizing utility of decision-making; learning with more structured preference feedback (Radlinski and Joachims, 2005; Shivaswamy and Joachims,…”
BackgroundBatch Active Learning Using Determinantal Point ProcessesPreprint
Bıyık, E., Wang, K., Anari, N., & Sadigh, D. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.07975 · Cited by 62
Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks
Kung, P.-N., Yin, F., Wu, D., Chang, K.-W., & Peng, N.-Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.00288 · Cited by 74
“Our method is more related to disagreement-based active learning (Houlsby et al., 2011; Siddhant and Lipton, 2018; Shen et al., 2017), which queries for instances where multiple models disagree the most, and is usually combined with model uncertainty measurements (Gal and Ghahramani, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodA Review on AI for Smart Manufacturing: Deep Learning Challenges and Solutions
Xu, J., Kovatsch, M., Mattern, D., Mazza, F., Harasic, M., Paschke, A., & Lucia, S. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12168239 · Cited by 95
A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regression
Holzmüller, D., Zaverkin, V., Kästner, J., & Steinwart, I. (2022) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09410 · Cited by 74
“…a GP with kernel k̃→scale(Xtrain) at x. Unlike in the classification setting, the noise distribution ε ∼ N (0, σ2) in the GP model is independent of x, which renders different acquisition functions like maximum entropy (Shannon, 1948; MacKay, 1992b) or BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011) equivalent to Eq.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKiyasseh, D., Zhu, T.-T., & Clifton, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24483-0 · Cited by 74
Interventions, Where and How? Experimental Design for Causal Models at ScalePreprint
Tigas, P., Annadani, Y., Jesson, A., Schölkopf, B., Gal, Y., & Bauer, S. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02016 · Cited by 73
“Our work differs from ABCD in a few ways: we work with both linear and nonlinear SCMs by using state-of-the-art posterior models over DAGs (Lorch et al., 2021), we apply BO to select the value to intervene with, but we also prepare the batch using soft BALD (Kirsch et al., 2021) which is significantly faster than the g…”
InfluentialTopological Feature Extraction and Visualization of Whole Slide Images using Graph Neural NetworksPreprint
Levy, J. J., Haudenschild, C., Barwick, C., Christensen, B., & Vaickus, L. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.08.01.231639 · Cited by 71
Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and Applications
Hu, M.-T., Zhang, Z., Zhao, S., Huang, M., & Wu, B. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.04459 · Cited by 70
“Moreover,to measure different sources of uncertainty, mutual information (MI; [75, 77]) between ensemble predictions and their parameters is often used in NLP models [78, 79, 80].”
BackgroundPreference Exploration for Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Multiple Outcomes
Lin, Z. J., Astudillo, R., Frazier, P., & Bakshy, E. (2022) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11382 · Cited by 69
“We consider three strategies for learning preferences over Y = ˜ f ( X ) : random search, BALD, and a novel AF called EUBO which is introduced in §4.1 and aims to find the best query over a known set of outcomes.”
BackgroundInfluentialActive Learning for Sequence Tagging with Deep Pre-trained Models and Bayesian Uncertainty Estimates
Shelmanov, A., Puzyrev, D., Kupriyanova, L., Belyakov, D., Larionov, D., Khromov, N., Kozlova, O., Artemova, E., Dylov, D., & Panchenko, A. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.08133 · Cited by 68
“However, the Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) proposed by Houlsby et al. (2011) leverage mutual information between outputs y i and model parameters θ trained on a dataset D : Let p cmi be a probability of a tag c for a token i that is predicted by a m -th stochastic pass of a model…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSpecifying Weight Priors in Bayesian Deep Neural Networks with Empirical Bayes
Krishnan, R., Subedar, M. M., & Tickoo, O. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5875 · Cited by 4
“We evaluate the model uncertainty and predictive uncertainty us-ing Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) (Equation 6) and predictive entropy (Equation 7), respectively.”
MethodFine-tuning BERT for Low-Resource Natural Language Understanding via Active Learning
Grießhaber, D., Maucher, J., & Vu, N. T. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.02462 · Cited by 66
“In this work, we focus on the “Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD)” (Houlsby et al., 2011) acquisition strategy because it demonstrated very good performance in comparison to other strategies in the experiments by Gal et al. (2017) as well as in our own preliminary experiments.”
ResultActive Learning of Convolutional Neural Network for Cost-Effective Wafer Map Pattern Classification
Shim, J., Kang, S., & Cho, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing · doi:10.1109/tsm.2020.2974867 · Cited by 70
“This measure corresponds to the mutual information between predictions and model parameters W [30].”
BackgroundAdversarial Distillation of Bayesian Neural Network PosteriorsPreprint
Wang, K.-C. J., Vicol, P. A., Lucas, J., Gu, L., Grosse, R., & Zemel, R. S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.10317 · Cited by 39
“Table 4 shows the performance of SGD, MC dropout, SGLD, and APD using the fcNN1 network (784- 100-10) with VR, entropy, and BALD.”
MethodInfluentialActive learning for optimal intervention design in causal models
Zhang, J., Cammarata, L. V., Squires, C., Sapsis, T. P., & Uhler, C. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00719-0 · Cited by 29
“For example, if the quantity of interest is g ( a ), then BALD seeks to find a ′ such that the information gain measured by the entropy decay is maximized.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AIPreprint
Manduchi, L., Meister, C., Pandey, K., Bamler, R., Cotterell, R., Däubener, S., Fellenz, S., Fischer, A., Gärtner, T., Kirchler, M., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.00025 · Cited by 102
“In addition, human evaluation focuses on individual images and does not necessarily measure how well the generative model reflects the data distribution.”
Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation using Machine Learning
Song, X., Wallace, B. M., Gardner, J. R., Ledbetter, N. M., Weinberger, K. Q., & Barbour, D. (2015) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000186 · Cited by 59
“Our technique currently uses uncertainty sampling, but other techniques from psychophysics or Bayesian active learning may prove better suited for this application (King-Smith et al. 1994; Kontsevich & Tyler 1999; Roy & McCallum 2001; Settles 2009; Houlsby et al. 2011).”
MethodSource Data-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation
Ye, M., Zhang, J., Ouyang, J., & Yuan, D. (2021) · ACM Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3474085.3475384 · Cited by 58
“In (f), we can observe that the high BALD area has considerable overlaps with the correct predictions.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExplaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Values
Watson, D., O’Hara, J., Tax, N., Mudd, R., & Guy, I. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05724 · Cited by 57
“Epistemic uncertainty is simply the difference [27], he(x) := ht(x)−ha(x).”
BackgroundRuah, C., Simeone, O., & Al‐Hashimi, B. M. (2023) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2023.3310093 · Cited by 54
Active Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: A comparative review
Thoreau, R., Achard, V., Risser, L., Berthelot, B., & Briottet, X. (2022) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2022.3169947 · Cited by 57
“From our experiments, the Core Set [12] and Hierarchical [41] representativeness techniques as well as the Breaking Tie [21] and BALD [13] uncertainty heuristics stand out from other techniques.”
BackgroundMethodAI in drug development: a multidisciplinary perspective
Gallego, V., Naveiro, R., Roca, C., Insua, D. R., & Campillo, N. E. (2021) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-021-10266-8 · Cited by 85
Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic UncertaintyPreprint
Bickford-Smith, F., Kossen, J., Trollope, E., van der Wilk, M., Foster, A., & Rainforth, T. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.20892 · Cited by 55
“Bridging this generalised perspective back to how aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty have been discussed in past work, we provide new insights on BALD, a popular information-theoretic objective for data acquisition (Gal et al, 2017; Houlsby et al, 2011; Lindley, 1956).”
InfluentialActive Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task
Tamkin, A., Nguyen, D., Deshpande, S., Mu, J., & Goodman, N. D. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.08491 · Cited by 55
“AL and example selection Active learning (AL) (Lewis and Catlett, 1994; Settles and Craven, 2008; Settles, 2009; Houlsby et al., 2011) is a well-studied field that investigates how machine learning algorithms might automatically select helpful additional data points to maximize their performance.”
BackgroundVaB-AL: Incorporating Class Imbalance and Difficulty with Variational Bayes for Active Learning
Choi, J., Yi, K. M., Kim, J., Choo, J., Kim, B., Chang, J.-Y., Gwon, Y., & Chang, H. (2020) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00668 · Cited by 55
“Among the multiple methods to estimate the uncertainty in DBAL, we use the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [15] as the estimation method – it showed the best generality in our experiments.”
MethodActiveLink: Deep Active Learning for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Ostapuk, N., Yang, J., & Cudré-Mauroux, P. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313620 · Cited by 52
“It can be instantiated through different acquisition functions, such as maximum entropy [28], BALD [15], and variation ratios [11].”
BackgroundEnvironmental Context Prediction for Lower Limb Prostheses With Uncertainty Quantification
Zhong, B.-X., Silva, R. L. D., Li, M.-H., Huang, H., & Lobaton, E. J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2020.2993399 · Cited by 53
“Mutual information between the posterior over W and the prediction y∗ quantifies the uncertainty in the BNN’s output [26].”
BackgroundEffective Evaluation of Deep Active Learning on Image Classification TasksPreprint
Beck, N., Sivasubramanian, D., Dani, A., Ramakrishnan, G., & Iyer, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.15324 · Cited by 35
“BALD [11] and BATCHBALD [19] do not perform well against the other strategies, and BATCHBALD does not perform as well as BALD in our setting.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkPreprint
van Amersfoort, J., Smith, L., Teh, Y. W., & Gal, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.02037 · Cited by 302
“Estimating uncertainty reliably and efficiently has remained an open problem with many important applications such as guiding exploration in Reinforcement Learning (Osband et al., 2016) or as a method for selecting data points for which to acquire labels in Active Learning (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
MethodTraversing chemical space with active deep learning for low-data drug discovery
van Tilborg, D., & Grisoni, F. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00697-2 · Cited by 50
“Mutual information 53 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlsby, N., Huszár, F., Ghahramani, Z., & Lengyel, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- arXiv
- 1112.5745
- OpenAlex
- W1872312298
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- Bayesian active learning, information gain, predictive entropy, Gaussian process classifier, preference learning, classification, nonparametric models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review