The DOI matches its DataCite record; 14 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Active Learning for Classification and Preference Learning
Open accessAbstract
Information theoretic active learning has been widely studied for probabilistic models. For simple regression an optimal myopic policy is easily tractable. However, for other tasks and with more complex models, such as classification with nonparametric models, the optimal solution is harder to compute. Current approaches make approximations to achieve tractability. We propose an approach that expresses information gain in terms of predictive entropies, and apply this method to the Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC). Our approach makes minimal approximations to the full information theoretic objective. Our experimental performance compares favourably to many popular active learning algorithms, and has equal or lower computational complexity. We compare well to decision theoretic approaches also, which are privy to more information and require much more computational time. Secondly, by developing further a reformulation of binary preference learning to a classification problem, we extend our algorithm to Gaussian Process preference learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also used to guide methods that require exploration like active learning [53], continual learning [92], Bayesian optimisation [47], and reinforcement learning [58].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The epistemic term I x is BALD's acquisition score [Houlsby et al., 2011]”
From Decomposing LLM-Judge Uncertainty to Target Expert Labels (2026) · cites this paper as Houlsby et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Seung, H., Opper, M., & Sompolinsky, H. (1992) · Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130417 · Cited by 2,193 · cited 2×
“Perhaps the most ubiquitous is active learning for SVMs [Tong and Koller, 2001, Seung et al., 1992], where the volume of Version Space (VS) is used as a proxy for the posterior entropy.”
BackgroundMethodNear-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes
Guestrin, C., Krause, A., & Singh, A. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102385 · Cited by 1,906 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
On a measure of the information provided by an experiment
Lindley, D. V. (1956) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 2×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundMethodInformation-based objective functions for active data selection
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 2×
“We no longer need to build our entropy calculation around the type of posterior approximation (as in [MacKay, 1992, Krishnapuram et al., , Lawrence et al., 2003]) but are free to choose from many of the available algorithms.”
BackgroundMethodExpected Information as Expected Utility
Bernardo, J. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344689 · Cited by 705 · cited 1×
“Although the latter approach was proposed several decades ago [Lindley, 1956, Bernardo, 1979], it is not always straightforward to apply the criteria to complicated models such as nonparametric processes with infinite parameter spaces.”
BackgroundPreference learning with Gaussian processes
Chu, W., & Ghahramani, Z. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102369 · Cited by 504 · cited 4×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationNear-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost
Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Gupta, A., & Kleinberg, J. (2006) · 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1127777.1127782 · Cited by 489 · cited 1×
“[Guestrin et al., 2005, Krause et al., 2006] also use mutual information.”
BackgroundPairwise Preference Learning and Ranking
Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (2003) · European Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39857-8_15 · Cited by 295 · cited 1×
“Our active learning framework for GPC can be extended to the important problem of preference learning [F¨urnkranz and H¨ullermeier, 2003, Chu and Ghahramani, 2005].”
MethodMaximum entropy sampling and optimal bayesian experimental design
Sebastiani, P., & Wynn, H. P. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00225 · Cited by 243 · cited 1×
“Information Theoretic approaches: Maximum Entropy Sampling (MES) [Sebastiani and Wynn, 2000] explicitly works in dataspace (Eqn.”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 981
Specification-Aware Predictive Uncertainty DecompositionPreprint
Vashurin, R., Seleznyov, M., Yermekova, A., Chernogorskii, F., Zykov, D., Tutubalina, E., Panchenko, A., Nakov, P., Kotelevskii, N., & Panov, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.02956
“These components can be approximated with Bayesian models (Kotelevskii et al., 2025; Schweighofer et al., 2025), which recover the decomposition of Houlsby et al. (2011) as a special case.”
Graph-Localized Coverage for Conformal Prediction on Inductive Graphs
Xu, J.-W., Lu, Q., & Giannakis, G. B. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.04066
“Second, Monte Carlo dropout (Gal & Ghahramani, 2016) quantifies query-specific predictive uncertainty, from which we construct a predictable mutual-information (MI) score (Houlsby et al., 2011) scale adapts prediction-set allocation.”
Hear-to-Hear: Uncertainty-Aware, Head-Tracked Interaction for Personalized Spatial Audio
Tsai, Y.-C., & Cheng, L.-P. (2026) · Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3830398.3830661
“Active preference learning then chooses which comparisons to show by maximizing informativeness (e.g., expected information gain) [14, 19], which we adopt to reduce interaction burden under noisy feedback.”
Borsha, M. K. N., Rahman, M. S., & Hossain, M. S. (2026) · American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions · doi:10.54536/ajsts.v5i2.8842
“Entropy and mutual information allow splitting total uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic (Houlsby et al. , 2011; Kendall & Gal, 2017).”
Li, B.-C., Chang, Y.-L., & García, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.01245
“…with the highest expected information gain, where H is the entropy and p t ( y | a ) = E q t ( θ ) p ( y | θ, a ) is the predictive under the current belief (Houlsby et al., 2011), computed exactly for the categorical families and by Monte Carlo with 64 posterior samples for the Gaussian family.”
When Does Active Learning Improve ADMET Prediction? A Multi-Endpoint BenchmarkPreprint
Najdovski, V., Hristova, J., Vodilovska, V., & Ivanoska, I. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.26.761649
“Information-theoretic acquisition based on the mutual information between predictions and model parameters 24 was extended to deep networks through MC dropout 25 , and deep ensembles have since become the competing standard.”
Active Learning of Conditional Generative Models via the Transport Neural Tangent Kernel
Ryu, J., Cho, K., & Lopez, R. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.35652
When Does Data Value Reduce to Class Balance? A Coverage View of Per-Point Data Valuation
Bai, Y.-J., & Zhi, W.-M. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.34801
Perturbation-Based Data Selection for Medical Question Answering
Wu, Y.-X., Yu, D.-Y., & Rus, V. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.33440
“BALD-inspired uses final-block-input hidden dropout rather than parameter dropout; BatchBALD-inspired uses a sampled joint-disagreement criterion from these stochastic predictions [1, 2].”
Valapil, A. A. C., Venkataramanan, A., & Denzler, J. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.32505
“It has been shown previously that sensing in a high-uncertainty region optimally increases information gain (Krause et al., 2008; Houlsby et al., 2011).”
InfluentialHimmBO: High-Dimensional Interactive Model-Merging Bayesian Optimization for Image Generation
Mao, J.-Y., Shen, Z.-H., & Liu, C.-X. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.30875
“BO seeks a single best point [SKKS10], AL an accurate surrogate through uncertainty-or information-based queries [Mac92,SWGO00,HHGL11,BHGL19], and LSE the set of candidates above a level [BNG ∗ 05,GCHK13,BSKC16].”
Post-hoc Epistemic Uncertainty for Vision-Language-Action PoliciesPreprint
Keller, J., Bloße, A., Lindenmeyer, A., Neumuth, T., & Schneider, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.29730
“Deep active learning uses Bayesian disagreement [68–70] or representation diversity [71, 72], or combines uncertainty and diversity in gradient space [72].”
Measure First, Then Allocate: Calibrated Rollout Budgets for MCP Agents in Reinforcement Learning
Tran, H., Yao, Z., Kwon, S., & Yu, H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.28785
“Its task selection is related to active learning (Settles, 2009; Houlsby et al., 2011) and adaptive replay (Schaul et al., 2016), with non-degenerate group probability as the allocation objective.”
Agentic In-Context Learning: What Algorithms Can Transformers Learn in Closed-Loop Interaction?Preprint
Wu, S., Wang, Y., & Yao, Q. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.23051
“Querying z t ∈ P t returns y t and gives BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011) selects queries using G t = SoftArgMax β t { α t ( z ) } z ∈P t , where A terminal prediction can be included as an answer action.”
SPEAR: Selective Preference Elicitation with Adaptive Rewards for VLM-Guided Robotic Manipulation
Wu, Z.-W., Liu, R.-Z., Zhou, P., Chen, F., & Yang, Y.-C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.21621
“Classical acquisition functions (e.g., BALD [28]) assume an ideal oracle that always provides effective labels.”
Beyond Fixed Acquisition Functions: Temporal Difference Active Learning for Perturbation Discovery
Zhang, X.-D., Li, J.-Z., Tang, Y.-T., & Zhou, P.-J. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.22122
“Methods include BALD, which uses information gain (Houlsby et al., 2011), CoreSet, which emphasizes geometric coverage (Sener and Savarese, 2018), and BADGE, which combines uncertainty and diversity (Ash et al., 2020).”
Sporring, J. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.20396
“Decision and observation Issue in the corrective loop BALD [Houlsby et al., 2011] Learner requests a label; beliefs determine its expected informativeness.”
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
Silcock, E., & Löwe, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.15165
“F1 is similar to that with an unbiased initial set, with LC, class-balanced DAL v2, BADGE and BALD the best.”
InfluentialTriage-PiEvo: Evidence Admission for Principle-Evolving Scientific AgentsPreprint
Li, P., Pu, Y., Xu, X., Cui, Y., Gao, Y., & Lin, T. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.14683
“In active learning and Bayesian optimization, one line decides where to spend evaluations (MacKay, 1992; Houlsby et al., 2011), constraining exploration for safety (Sui et al., 2015) or scalability (Eriksson et al., 2019).”
$\sigma$Transfer: Uncertainty Transfer from Small to Large Networks under $\mu\mathrm{P}$
Bergna, R., Mazo, F. R., Felicioni, N., Hernández-Lobato, J. M., Cambridge, K., & Spotify (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.11668
“In the language-model gating experiment (Section 6.3), the proxy’s BALD score (Houlsby et al., 2011) is thresholded to decide whether the target should abstain.”
InfluentialSynAct: Synergistic Active Feedback Learning for LLM AgentsPreprint
Liu, N., Li, I., & Klinkner, K. L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.12651
“We inherit from pool-based active learning (Set-tles, 2009), where query-by-committee measures disagreement across hypotheses (Seung et al., 1992) and information-theoretic criteria select maximally informative queries (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
SpatialUQ: Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification from Spatial Consistency in Black-Box Vision Models
Mahbub, M. K., Biswas, M., Morshed, M. N., & Yu, W. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.09498
“Predictive entropy (Shannon, 1948) and mutual information (Houlsby et al., 2011) are canonical output-space baselines.”
Conformal Prediction Sets Quantify Information Gain: A Theoretical Perspective
Zhang, K. B., & Bates, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.08785
“Information gain metrics are widely used in practice for active learning (Houlsby et al., 2011; Kirsch et al., 2019; Bickford Smith et al., 2023) and feature acquisition (Covert et al., 2023).”
Explore, Then Commit: Measurement-Efficient Scientific Law Discovery with Language Models
Mandve, K., & Fernando, D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.07620
“Bayesian experimental design formalizes information gathering [12]; query by committee selects through disagreement [13]; Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement uses a probabilistic information criterion [14].”
EpicWorldModel: Exploration-driven Planning with Latent World ModelsPreprint
Feng, B., Ost, J., Mei, M., Majumdar, A., & Heide, F. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05996
“In the Bayesian active learning literature [Houlsby et al., 2011, Gal et al., 2017], EIG measures mutual information between the seed and potential future latent states where the inequality is from Proposition 2.”
Bayesian Entropy-based Reordering for Calibrated Diffusion Language Models
Jiang, Z.-J., & Park, M. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05125
“MI isolates disagreement among posterior draws (Houlsby et al., 2011), but it can be small even when every draw assigns a diffuse token distribution.”
Soft Strategy Selection for Batch-Mode Active Learning
Gupta, R., & Lopez, R. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05544
“Many AL strategies have been proposed, targeting model uncertainty (Houlsby et al., 2011), batch diversity (Sener & Savarese, 2018), pool representativeness (Yehuda et al., 2022; Hacohen et al., 2022), or combinations of these.”
Targeted Active Learning for Preference-Based Treatment Effects on Multivariate Outcomes
Giordani, L., Even, M., Geoffroy, C., Corvol, J., Porcher, R., & Pavone, F. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.03824
“053 for BALD.”
InfluentialExact Distinguishability in Non-Markovian Decision Processes
Murjani, K., & Patel, N. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.01527
“…deviations by expected information gain (EIG) under the posterior over the candidate structures, which applies Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) (Houlsby et al., 2011) takes the value 1 on the histories whose actions are α , and the posterior after h is w i ( h ) ∝ w i L M i ( h ).”
InfluentialGuo, Y.-F. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.01819
“BALD uses mutual information between predictions and model uncertainty (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
Structural Limits of the Information-Theoretic Uncertainty DecompositionPreprint
Christensen, J. L., Baumgartner, C. F., Hannemose, M. R., Dahl, A. B., & Dahl, V. A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.39591
“For a finite set of model predictions, the standard information-theoretic decomposition (Houlsby et al., 2011; Kendall & Gal, 2017; Depeweg et al., 2018) defines total uncertainty (TU) as the entropy of the mean predictive distribution, AU as the mean entropy of individual predictions, and EU as…”
On the Complexity of Preference-Based Bandits
Yahmed, A. B., Abeille, M., & Calauzènes, C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.39351
“…feedback was first studied in supervised preference learning (Aiolli and Sperduti, 2004; Chu and Ghahramani, 2005), and later extended to online and sequential settings motivated by applications such as human-provided feedback (Yue and Joachims, 2009; Yue et al., 2012; Houlsby et al., 2011).”
Distilling What Matters: Confidence-Aware Selective Distillation for Large Language Models
Sengupta, A., Seth, V., & Chakraborty, T. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.36734
“We therefore introduce Revival , a sequence-level rejection mechanism based on the BALD score [12] computed via Monte Carlo dropout [18]: which measures predictive disagreement across stochastic parameter realizations.”
AGILE-GS: Anchor-Guided Fast Next-Best-View Selection for Active 3D Gaussian Splatting
Khass, A. M., & Motee, N. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.34176
“Active acquisition selects the view whose observation is expected to most reduce uncertainty in the estimated scene parameters [10, 16].”
Unsupervised Component Decoupling for Fine-Grained Information Quality Evaluation
Wu, J.-S., Xiao, S., Zhang, Z., Wen, J.-B., Li, B.-H., Meng, Q.-G., Lu, W., Yang, J.-C., & Gao, X.-B. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2026.3736325
“24–26. where E y [ · ] denotes the expectation over categorical variable y [42].”
Xu, H.-W., Fu, W.-Y., Han, H.-B., & Xie, Z.-H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.35445
“…et al., 2020), Transolver (Wu et al., 2024), WDNO (Hu et al., 2025), DiffusionPDE (Huang et al., 2024b Acquisition EIG (Lindley, 1956), BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011), BAX (Neiswanger et al., 2021), PS-BAX (Cheng et al., 2024a), MF-MES (Takeno et al., 2020), DAD (Foster et al., 2021), iDAD…”
There’s Something About You: Epistemic Recommendation for Latent Interest Discovery
Nemirovsky, D., Khokher, P. N. S., Jois, A., Zagha, M., & Delgado, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3773078.3831822
“BALD [19] maximizes mutual information between predictions and model parameters.”
Certifying Interventional Agreement Among Observationally Equivalent Causal Models
Khanzadeh, S., Platnick, D., Alirezaie, M., & Rahnama, H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.32247
“…on which hypotheses disagree (Mitchell, 1982; Seung et al., 1992; Freund et al., 1997); Bayesian active learning scores expected disagreement (Houlsby et al., 2011), ensembles use disagreement as uncertainty (Laksh-minarayanan et al., 2017), and disagreement across training runs predicts…”
Clarify the User or Verify the World? Uncertainty Routing for Proactive Agents
Li, Z.-F., Zhang, X., Xiao, X., & Deng, Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.32255
“Classical work separates aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty (Kendall & Gal, 2017), and Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) measures parameter-induced disagreement (Houlsby et al., 2011).”
Not All Confusion Is Equal: A Source-Aware Uncertainty Diagnosis for Fine-Grained Aircraft Detection
Huang, H., & Mayer, H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.29959
“In classification, the epistemic part is commonly the information-theoretic mutual information between predictions and model parameters (BALD) [3, 4, 8], estimated via MC-dropout [4], deep ensembles [11], or a Laplace approximation to the posterior [2, 12, 13].”
Targeted Review for AI-Assisted Biodiversity Surveys: Active Continuous-Score Occupancy Modeling
Haucke, T., Harrell, L., Kay, J., Clapp, M. K., & Beery, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.25657
“Bayesian active learning methods such as BALD select labels informative about the model posterior [28].”
InfluentialActive machine learning using MCMC Bayesian neural networks
Jawla, D., Kelleher, J. D., & Leva, M. C. (2026) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.24569.1
Simultaneous Forward and Inverse Human-in-the-Loop Optimization
Park, K., & Collins, S. H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.22630
“For a known outcome pair, define the outcome-space mutual-information score where H is binary entropy [43].”
Xu, J.-C., Liu, L., You, G.-D., Song, X., Chen, K., Li, X.-Y., & Liu, W.-Z. (2026) · Measurement science and technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aea9b7
“The predictive and expected conditional entropies [26, 37] are The normalized mutual information gives the epistemic component: Larger values indicate greater disagreement among model realizations.”
Online adaptive kernel mixing for Gaussian process decision making
Aravindan, K., Sriram, M. T., Dasarathy, G., & Bodas, T. (2026) · Performance evaluation (Print) · doi:10.1016/j.peva.2026.102595
“…functions are predictive entropy [19], which is a monotonic function of the posterior variance for a Gaussian, so maximizing it is equivalent to using α t ( x ) = σ 2 t ( x ) , and Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD), which maximizes the expected decrease in predictive entropy [21].”
Subspace Inference Enables Efficient Active Reward Learning from PreferencesPreprint
Zhou, Y., & Bıyık, E. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.04066
“It was later extended to Bayesian optimization using Gaussian process models under the methods Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) (Houlsby et al., 2011), entropy search (ES) (Hennig & Schuler, 2012), and predictive entropy search (PES) (Hernández-Lobato et al., 2014).”
Almeida, R., Otero, N., Arndt, J., Baur, S., Samek, W., & Ma, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.30795 · Cited by 1
Learning Action Models with Conditional and Quantified Effects via Uncertainty-Guided Exploration
Jewett, J., Solow, W., & Saisubramanian, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.30955
Epiplexity Guided Data Selection and Generation for Out-of-Distribution Generalization
Su, E., Potapczynski, A., Qiu, S.-K., Hughes, E., & Wilson, A. G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.11746
“Rewarding a generator by learning-progress metrics is a long standing approach, dating back to literature in artificial curiosity [29–31] and active learning [32, 33].”
Attention-Path Fragility as an Uncertainty Signal in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Kim, M., Ji, S., Moon, K., & Yoon, I. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.11138
“…each Monte Carlo sample we mask attention heads at a target layer and quantify disagreement among the resulting predictive distributions via the BALD mutual-information decomposition (Houlsby et al. 2011; Smith and Gal 2018), with a semantic-agreement kernel to discount surface-form disagreement.”
Ma, A., Schell, L., Bhaskara, V., & Pishdad, L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.07827
“…Mahaut et al., 2024 Multi-pass estimators obtain additional confidence signals through p (True) -based self-verification (Kadavath et al., 2022) or c BALD computed from stochastic forward passes (Houlsby et al., 2011). et al., 2025), it requires processing the question– response context again.”
Giri, S., & Chen, Y. (2026) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss60577.2026.11730678
“A critical novelty of this framework is the decomposition of uncertainty into Aleatoric and Epistemic components using Information Theory [14], [33].”
Chazhoor, A. A. P., Hu, S., Gao, B., Ho, E. S. L., & Woo, W. L. (2026) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-026-21825-2
Abbasi, M., Tejedor, J. P., Torres, C. V., & Plaza-Hernández, M. (2026) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.24532.1
Principled Direction-Free Intrinsic Motivation through Model-Free Epistemic Free-Energy Estimators
Furutanpey, A., & Dustdar, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.16858
“The two terms are linked by the mutual-information identity of BALD [20], the epistemic–aleatoric decomposition [12], so ) , the expected surprise of the next state minus (1 + λ ) times its irreducible part.”
Optimal photostimulation selection for iterative activity maps
Morra, J. J., Fouke, K. E., Traubert, O., & Naumann, E. A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.12930
“For the first model that we augment with OPhELIA, we employ a first order approximation of Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [49], which is a prominent active learning strategy which is well-suited for selecting informative training set samples for supervised learning problems [50].”
Slide-Level Active Learning Reduces Annotation Burden in H&E images
Vali, M., Weng, Z.-L., Moreau, N., Tolkach, Y., & Bozek, K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.09831
“To account for this behavior, we propose a stage-adaptive acquisition strategy that combines entropy-based and MC dropout-based uncertainty, estimated using the BALD criterion [36, 37].”
Three Percent is Enough: Semi-Supervised Martian Segmentation Labeling With Active Learning
Li, M., Zhou, R., Ding, L., Yang, H., Gao, H., & Deng, Z. (2026) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2026.3693576
“Typical examples include entropy-based measures, least confidence sampling, and Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [24].”
Edge-Cloud Collaborative Calibration of Industrial Digital Twin Models
Wu, J., Yang, D., Lu, S., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestie.2026.3691194
“However, in contin-uousdecision-makingtasks,agreedystrategyisoftenemployed, whichcanapproachoptimality[33].”
Kim, H., Chang, S.-M., Lim, B.-Y., Lee, S.-Y., & Jung, H. (2026) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering13070762
“Houlsby et al. [35] introduced Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD), which selects samples that maximize mutual information between predictions and model parameters; in modern implementations, BALD is operationalized via MC Dropout [25], the same Bayesian-approximation principle we use…”
Re-mixing Embeddings for Patient Augmentation in Data Scarce Multiple Instance Learning
Dasdelen, M. F., Ozlugedik, F., Litinetskaya, A., Navab, N., Marr, C., & Sadafi, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.25770
“We also ablate BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) [5] and the standard deviation of the predicted class’s maximum logit (Max-STD) across posterior samples [3] as alternative uncertainty metrics (see 5.4).”
InfluentialNguyen, N. T., & Nghiem, T. X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.25301
“…through the mutual information, or equivalently the reduction in Shannon entropy, between the candidate observation and the unknown model parameters Houlsby et al. (2011), an idea originally developed for Bayesian classification and preference learning and later adapted to Gaussian process…”
Efficient Analytic Uncertainty Quantification for Multi-Modal Regression
Jin, K., Harrison, J., Li, J., Liu, S.-H., Liu, J., Linderman, R., Li, Y.-N., Bhadury, A., Bansod, S., Liu, L., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.25188
“While Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [Houlsby et al., 2011, Gal et al., 2017] is a dominant paradigm, applying sampling-based acquisition to large-scale regression introduces severe computational bottlenecks.”
FairBED: Incorporating Fairness into Bayesian Experimental DesignPreprint
Hedman, M., Alger, E., Lehmann, B., Holmes, C., & Rainforth, T. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.23515
“…predictive information gain [6] scores a candidate input x by the expected information its label carries about the labels of future test inputs, EPIG( x ) = E p ∗ ( x ∗ ) [ I ( y ; y ∗ | x, x ∗ )] , which targets predictions at test inputs rather than the latent variables υ themselves [33].”
Samplawski, C., Kaur, R., Acharya, M., Roy, A., & Cobb, A. D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.22188
“…Bayesian approaches which compute a softmax probabilties for N samples from the posterior, we use Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [Houlsby et al., 2011]: BALD scores a candidate point x by the mutual information between its unknown label y and the current model parameters θ given…”
Can In-Context Learning Support Intrinsic Curiosity?
Elmoznino, E., Bhardwaj, S., von Oswald, J., Nasser, R., Arcas, B. A. Y., Sacramento, J., Saurous, R. A., & Lajoie, G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.19476
“…a model’s belief over possible environments — an approach termed Bayesian information gain (BIG) or Bayesian surprise (Sun et al., 2011; Little and Sommer, 2013; Itti and Baldi, 2009; Houthooft et al., 2016; Stadie et al., 2015; MacKay, 1992; Fedorov, 1972; Houlsby et al., 2011; Lindley, 1956).”
On the QUEST for Uncertainty Quantification via Highest Density Regions
Goring, S. J., Kuipers, T., Paoletti, N., & Watson, D. S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.19569
“However, unlike in the classification setting, where many authors have investigated the empirical and theoretical performance of UMs [21, 28, 56, 44], regression uncertainty has received relatively little attention.”
Data Assisted Ground Truth Generation in Agricultural Orthomosaic
Kiforenko, L., Midtiby, H. S., & Ladig, R. (2026) · International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) · doi:10.1109/icuas69441.2026.11598628
“They evaluated approaches such as Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) [14], stochastic BALD (PowerBALD) [15], and random sampling.”
Park, Y., Chung, H., & Jang, I. (2026) · ECML/PKDD · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15623
“Information-theoretic approaches select pairs with highest expected information gain [4,7].”
SymQNet: Amortized Acquisition for Low-Latency Adaptive Hamiltonian Learning
Tomar, Y., & Peddireddy, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12808
Epistemic Uncertainty Is Not the Reducible Kind
Young, R. R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12646
“BALD (Houlsby et al., 2011; Kirsch et al., 2019) acquires the point maximizing I ( y ; θ | x, D ), the mutual information between observation and model parameters.”
Active Inference as Context Acquisition for AI Agents
Dutta, S., Ramachandran, S. N., & Sra, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.19202
ShaplEIG: Bayesian Experimental Design for Shapley Value Estimation
Rundel, D., Fumagalli, F., Muschalik, M., Bischl, B., & Feurer, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.02247
“A common choice is to place a GP prior on the latent function f (Krause et al., 2008; Houlsby et al., 2011; Hennig & Schuler, 2012; Neiswanger et al., 2021).”
Nipa, N. A., Chao, M. H., & Shetty, S. (2026) · International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/iwcmc69287.2026.11579951
“4] in aleatoric uncertainty across methods.”
DLC2Action: A Multimodal Deep Learning-based Toolbox for Automated Behavior Segmentation
Kozlova, E., Bonnetto, A., & Mathis, A. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.27.678941
“There are several methods for assessing that uncertainty on a sample, and the most widely used in the context of deep learning are Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (81), least confidence, and entropy (82) scores.”
Deep docking, part 2: an amplified DDU platform for ultra-large virtual screening
Pandey, M., Sajed, T., Semenov, I., Zhang, R.-F., Ban, F.-Q., Manskaia, E., Ester, M., & Cherkasov, A. (2026) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d5sc09599a
“From the second iteration onward, the training dataset is iteratively expanded by adding the top 100 molecules according to the BALD acquisition strategy.”
InfluentialOn the Construction and Implications of Low-Loss Valleys in LoRA-based Bayesian Inference
Dold, D., Sommer, E., Kobialka, J., Dürr, O., & Rügamer, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.29580
“To quantify epistemic uncertainty as a measure of functional diversity within our LoRA-Curve framework, we compute the Mutual Information (MI) between the curve parameter t and the predictive output y , following the Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) objective [9].”
Active Continual Learning with Metaplastic Binary Bayesian Neural Networks
Cottart, K., Ballet, T., Bonnet, D., & Querlioz, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.30198
“Bayesian models naturally support AL through uncertainty-based acquisition functions such as mutual information (BALD) (Houlsby et al., 2011) or predictive en-2 tropy (Shannon, 1948).”
Soft Specialists: $α$-Rényi Ensembles for Uncertainty-Aware LLM Post-TrainingPreprint
Cordero-Encinar, P., Tyukin, G., & Duncan, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27747
“High posterior disagreement may indicate prompts for which the alignment data do not determine a unique safe behaviour, suggesting a role for abstention, clarification, fallback policies, or targeted red-teaming [49, 36, 84].”
Cumulative Meta-Learning from Active Learning Queries for Robustness to Spurious CorrelationsPreprint
Chew, K. W., & Wang, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.20771
“This uncertainty can be estimated from the model’s predictive probabilities [Roth and Small, 2006, Wang and Shang, 2014, Ducoffe and Precioso, 2018], or from the disagreement or variance across an ensemble of models [Houlsby et al., 2011, Gal et al., 2017, Beluch et al., 2018].”
A Mutual Information Lower Bound for Multimodal Regression Active Learning
Guilhoto, L. F., Kaushal, A., & Perdikaris, P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.14917
“Information-theoretic approaches such as Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) use mutual information to target epistemic uncertainty directly [1, 15].”
Ielanskyi, M., Wang, M., Scott, L., Rieber, L., Merrett, S. L., Schimunek, J., Mayr, A., McDowell, I. C., Klambauer, G., & Bowen, T. (2026) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkag545 · Cited by 1
“It builds upon the prior works on Reinforcement Learning-driven sequence de-sign [ 59 , 60 ] and Bayesian Deep Learning [ 61–63 ].”
Optimality of Sub-network Laplace Approximations: New Results and Methods
Raha, S., Khare, K., & Patra, R. K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.09075
“Similar normalizations appear in BALD [Houlsby et al., 2011], as well as in Fisher-normalized uncertainty measures dating back to MacKay [1992]; see also Kendall and Gal [2017].”
The Minimax Rate of Perturbed Second-Order Calibration
Ciosek, K., Rafiee, B., Ghiassian, S., & Felicioni, N. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07808
“Several lines of work produce mean-and-uncertainty outputs without calibration guarantees: Bayesian active learning by disagreement [Houlsby et al., 2011], variance decompositions for Bayesian neural networks [Depeweg et al., 2018, Kendall and Gal, 2017], and deep ensembles [Lakshminarayanan et…”
Active Learning for Communication Structure Optimization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Yang, H., Dong, X., Negruţ, D., & Wu, J.-L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.05703
“Although these sample-based estimators expose uncertainty-related signals, they are often prohibitively expensive (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017), especially in LLM-MAS, where scoring each candidate may require repeated multi-agent rollouts across multiple samples or parameter realizations.”
Decoupled PFNs: Identifiable Epistemic-Aleatoric Decomposition via Structured Synthetic Priors
Bergna, R., Depeweg, S., & Hernández-Lobato, J. M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.06413
“…is standard in Bayesian deep learning [Gal and Ghahramani, 2016, Kendall and Gal, 2017, Lakshminarayanan et al., 2017, Depeweg et al., 2018] and central to acquisition in active learning and Bayesian optimization [MacKay, 1992, Houlsby et al., 2011, Jones et al., 1998, Srinivas et al., 2009].”
Reinforced Active Learning for Change Point Detection
Bertolasi, S., Carrera, D., Stucchi, D., Fragneto, P., & Bianchi, L. A. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11464599
Cheng, Z., Cai, H., Sun, H., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11464468
Chung, J., Song, M., Jung, H., & Lee, N. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.95
“Active learning also exploits this distinction: EU drives sample acquisition, while AU marks unin-formative or noisy data (Houlsby et al., 2011; Gal et al., 2017).”
Zhang, R., Zhu, X., Khotbehsara, M. P., Dao, W., Bıyık, E., & Culbertson, H. (2026) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3774935.3806784
“To reduce user effort under a fixed interaction budget, we select the next query pair ( 𝑥 ,𝑥 ) by maximizing expected information gain (IG) [15, 21].”
Han, W., Martínez, D., Khanina, A., Cavedon, L., & Verspoor, K. M. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.20256
“…informativeness signals for U t via Monte-Carlo (MC) dropout; (2) we define a prior-aware utility that combines BALD-based mutual information (Houlsby et al., 2011) with pseudo-label class weighting to explicitly control the quality of selected samples for transfer learning under severe…”
When Active Learning Falls Short: An Empirical Study on Chemical Reaction Extraction
Yu, S., & Fathima, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.19335
“• BALD-based batch selection employs Bayesian active learning by disagreements(BALD) [46] to estimate uncertainty independently for each sentence, and perform batch construction externally via stratified selection.”
Boundary-Centric Clip-Budgeted Active Learning for Temporal Action Segmentation
Helvaci, H., & Cheung, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.15173
“In addition to predictive Entropy [66], we consider BALD [55], Power-BALD [67], Jensen–Shannon divergence (JSD) [68], and Variation Ratio [69].”
InfluentialCURA: Clinical Uncertainty Risk Alignment for Language Model-Based Risk Prediction
Wang, S., Xu, Z., Najjuuko, C., Alba, C., & Lu, C.-Y. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.14651
“Based on information-theoretic views of predictive uncertainty, where entropy is used as a measure of distributional uncertainty (Shannon, 1948; Houlsby et al., 2011), we quantify the model’s uncertainty via the entropy of the ensemble-averaged prediction: (2) We normalize this entropy by its…”
Hakimi, A. D., Hirlimann, L., Augenstein, I., & Schutze, H. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.2381
“Each panel shows the four active-learning acquisition strategies (entropy, BALD, Core-Set, BADGE), the random-sampling baseline, and the source’s own full-pool ceilings at 3.8K and 26K labels.”
InfluentialInfoChess: A Game of Adversarial Inference and a Laboratory for Quantifiable Information Control
Murphy, K. A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.15373
“Information gain is a standard concept from active learning used to compare actions in terms of the expected reduction in uncertainty after observation [10, 14].”
A 2 GBD: Attack-Agnostic Graph Backdoor Defense
Du, C., Liu, Y., Yu, X., Xu, Z., Liu, Y., & Li, T. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792507
“Higher 𝑆 info ( 𝑖 ) indicates more informative nodes for selection [13].”
Testing the Assumptions of Active Learning for Translation Tasks with Few Samples
Flores, L. J. Y., Piano, C. S. D., Ernst, O., Adelani, D. I., & Cheung, J. C. K. (2026) · Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning (MRL 2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.08977
“…aims to measure epistemic uncertainty using the difference be-tween the prediction’s entropy and the expected entropy over sampled model parameters (Houlsby et al., 2011; Kirsch et al., 2019; Gal et al., 2017) L EXICAL S IMILARITY (L EX S IM ) Lowest similarity between outputs sampled using…”
Feature Weighting Improves Pool-Based Sequential Active Learning for Regression
Wu, D.-R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.02019
“…other popular active learning algorithms, e.g., active learning with Gaussian processes [26], [27], Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) [28], etc., which use uncertainty (informativeness) as the primary criterion for sample selection, and may also be used for regression problems with…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlsby, N., Huszár, F., Ghahramani, Z., & Lengyel, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- arXiv
- 1112.5745
- OpenAlex
- W1872312298
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- Bayesian active learning, information gain, predictive entropy, Gaussian process classifier, preference learning, classification, nonparametric models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review